Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Scripta |
Texto Completo: | http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to critically review current studies with respect to definitions, methods, and results on the comprehension of metaphor, metonymy, idioms, and proverbs under the following clinical conditions: aphasia, Alzheimer’s disease, autism, brain injuries, specific language impairment, and Williams Syndrome. A comprehensive search of experimental psycholinguistic research was conducted using EBSCOhost, PsychInfo, PUBMED, and Web of Science databases. Thirty-eight studies met the review inclusion criteria. Results point to deficits in figurative language comprehension in all conditions considered, lack of clear definitions of the phenomena investigated, and varied methods throughout the sample. Patients’ difficulties are attributed to multiple factors, such as a lack of Theory of Mind, executive dysfunctions, and poor semantic knowledge. The study of nonliteral aspects of language comprehension in clinical populations reveals a range of disparate impairments. There was no specific feature about metaphor-related phenomena identified that could, on its own, account for the difficulty some populations have to understand figurative language. Rather, metaphor-related language comprehension difficulties are often part of pragmatic, linguistic, and/or cognitive impairments. |
id |
PUC_MINS-6_7a105d65abcc2297441f73bfb83c4135 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13965 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_MINS-6 |
network_name_str |
Revista Scripta |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical reviewFigurative languageMetaphorMetonymyProverbClinical populations.This paper aims to critically review current studies with respect to definitions, methods, and results on the comprehension of metaphor, metonymy, idioms, and proverbs under the following clinical conditions: aphasia, Alzheimer’s disease, autism, brain injuries, specific language impairment, and Williams Syndrome. A comprehensive search of experimental psycholinguistic research was conducted using EBSCOhost, PsychInfo, PUBMED, and Web of Science databases. Thirty-eight studies met the review inclusion criteria. Results point to deficits in figurative language comprehension in all conditions considered, lack of clear definitions of the phenomena investigated, and varied methods throughout the sample. Patients’ difficulties are attributed to multiple factors, such as a lack of Theory of Mind, executive dysfunctions, and poor semantic knowledge. The study of nonliteral aspects of language comprehension in clinical populations reveals a range of disparate impairments. There was no specific feature about metaphor-related phenomena identified that could, on its own, account for the difficulty some populations have to understand figurative language. Rather, metaphor-related language comprehension difficulties are often part of pragmatic, linguistic, and/or cognitive impairments. PUC Minas2016-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p3610.5752/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36Scripta; Vol 20 No 40 (2016): Metaphor; 36-60Scripta; v. 20 n. 40 (2016): Metáfora; 36-602358-34281516-4039reponame:Revista Scriptainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)instacron:PUC_MINSporhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36/11077https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSiqueira, MaityMarques, Daniela FernandesGibbs, Jr, Raymond W.2019-11-28T18:45:42Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/13965Revistahttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/userhttp://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/oai||cespuc@pucminas.br2358-34281516-4039opendoar:2019-11-28T18:45:42Revista Scripta - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
title |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
spellingShingle |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review Siqueira, Maity Figurative language Metaphor Metonymy Proverb Clinical populations. |
title_short |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
title_full |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
title_fullStr |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
title_sort |
Metaphor-related figurative language comprehension in clinical populations: a critical review |
author |
Siqueira, Maity |
author_facet |
Siqueira, Maity Marques, Daniela Fernandes Gibbs, Jr, Raymond W. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Marques, Daniela Fernandes Gibbs, Jr, Raymond W. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Siqueira, Maity Marques, Daniela Fernandes Gibbs, Jr, Raymond W. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Figurative language Metaphor Metonymy Proverb Clinical populations. |
topic |
Figurative language Metaphor Metonymy Proverb Clinical populations. |
description |
This paper aims to critically review current studies with respect to definitions, methods, and results on the comprehension of metaphor, metonymy, idioms, and proverbs under the following clinical conditions: aphasia, Alzheimer’s disease, autism, brain injuries, specific language impairment, and Williams Syndrome. A comprehensive search of experimental psycholinguistic research was conducted using EBSCOhost, PsychInfo, PUBMED, and Web of Science databases. Thirty-eight studies met the review inclusion criteria. Results point to deficits in figurative language comprehension in all conditions considered, lack of clear definitions of the phenomena investigated, and varied methods throughout the sample. Patients’ difficulties are attributed to multiple factors, such as a lack of Theory of Mind, executive dysfunctions, and poor semantic knowledge. The study of nonliteral aspects of language comprehension in clinical populations reveals a range of disparate impairments. There was no specific feature about metaphor-related phenomena identified that could, on its own, account for the difficulty some populations have to understand figurative language. Rather, metaphor-related language comprehension difficulties are often part of pragmatic, linguistic, and/or cognitive impairments. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36 10.5752/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36 |
url |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5752/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/P.2358-3428.2016v20n40p36/11077 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PUC Minas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
PUC Minas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scripta; Vol 20 No 40 (2016): Metaphor; 36-60 Scripta; v. 20 n. 40 (2016): Metáfora; 36-60 2358-3428 1516-4039 reponame:Revista Scripta instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) instacron:PUC_MINS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
instacron_str |
PUC_MINS |
institution |
PUC_MINS |
reponame_str |
Revista Scripta |
collection |
Revista Scripta |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Scripta - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||cespuc@pucminas.br |
_version_ |
1798329530178338816 |