Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22174 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Physical function impairment is a significant concern for patients who survive their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, due to its impact on the patient's independence and functional status. In this context,the choice of a suitable instrument for the assessing functional status is important, because an inappropriate assessment could lead to incorrect conclusions regarding patient prognosis, treatment benefits, andcondition. Objective: To identify which functional assessment tools are used in Brazil to assess patients who are in ICU. Additionally, we investigated the translation, adaptation, and validation of these instruments for use in this population. Methods: We searched Pubmed, SCIELO, Lilacs, and Scopus in November 2015. No language or date restrictions were applied to the search. Results: Ten studies and seven instruments were identified. The most commonly used instruments were the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale Scores and the Functional Independence Measure. Conclusion: The instruments found in the review were neither specifically developed to assess the functional status of ICU patients, nor were they validated for use in this population in Brazil. Transcultural development or adaptation studies should be conducted, followed by a validation process. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_17edbe012d7457689f916014a4e3ac2e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/22174 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settingsIntroduction: Physical function impairment is a significant concern for patients who survive their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, due to its impact on the patient's independence and functional status. In this context,the choice of a suitable instrument for the assessing functional status is important, because an inappropriate assessment could lead to incorrect conclusions regarding patient prognosis, treatment benefits, andcondition. Objective: To identify which functional assessment tools are used in Brazil to assess patients who are in ICU. Additionally, we investigated the translation, adaptation, and validation of these instruments for use in this population. Methods: We searched Pubmed, SCIELO, Lilacs, and Scopus in November 2015. No language or date restrictions were applied to the search. Results: Ten studies and seven instruments were identified. The most commonly used instruments were the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale Scores and the Functional Independence Measure. Conclusion: The instruments found in the review were neither specifically developed to assess the functional status of ICU patients, nor were they validated for use in this population in Brazil. Transcultural development or adaptation studies should be conducted, followed by a validation process.Editora PUCPRESS2017-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2217410.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AR02Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 1 (2017)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22174/21254Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMartins Faria, LuizaFaria Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima2022-03-07T19:01:56Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/22174Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:01:56Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
title |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
spellingShingle |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings Martins Faria, Luiza |
title_short |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
title_full |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
title_sort |
Assessment of functional status in the ICU: instruments used in Brazilian settings |
author |
Martins Faria, Luiza |
author_facet |
Martins Faria, Luiza Faria Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Faria Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins Faria, Luiza Faria Barbosa, Sayonara de Fátima |
description |
Introduction: Physical function impairment is a significant concern for patients who survive their intensive care unit (ICU) stay, due to its impact on the patient's independence and functional status. In this context,the choice of a suitable instrument for the assessing functional status is important, because an inappropriate assessment could lead to incorrect conclusions regarding patient prognosis, treatment benefits, andcondition. Objective: To identify which functional assessment tools are used in Brazil to assess patients who are in ICU. Additionally, we investigated the translation, adaptation, and validation of these instruments for use in this population. Methods: We searched Pubmed, SCIELO, Lilacs, and Scopus in November 2015. No language or date restrictions were applied to the search. Results: Ten studies and seven instruments were identified. The most commonly used instruments were the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale Scores and the Functional Independence Measure. Conclusion: The instruments found in the review were neither specifically developed to assess the functional status of ICU patients, nor were they validated for use in this population in Brazil. Transcultural development or adaptation studies should be conducted, followed by a validation process. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22174 10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AR02 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22174 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AR02 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22174/21254 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017) Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 1 (2017) 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138748112306176 |