Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribas Mélo, Tainá
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rodacki, André Luiz Félix, Bittencourt Guimarães, Ana Tereza, Israel, Vera Lúcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21712
Resumo: Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of three range of motion tests (Straight LegRaise, Modified Thomas, and Duncan-Ely) using photographic measurements in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (SD) and with typical development (TD). Methods: A cross-sectional test-retest design was applied to compare muscle-tendon unit shortening tests between groups. Results: The tests showed reliability that ranged from good to excellent (ICC > 0.8), except for the Thomas Test for the bi-articular hip flexor muscle-tendon unit of the TD group (ICC = 0.7). Differences between groups were found in all tests (p < 0.05), except when the range of motion of the bi-articular hip flexor muscles was assessed using theThomas test (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Children with SD presents a smaller range of motion than the TD group.However, the Thomas Test for the bi-articular hip flexor muscles was unable to determine differences between children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy from that with typical development.
id PUC_PR-26_1e73ea72fce26de4efb72dc49cf49d41
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21712
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical developmentObjective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of three range of motion tests (Straight LegRaise, Modified Thomas, and Duncan-Ely) using photographic measurements in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (SD) and with typical development (TD). Methods: A cross-sectional test-retest design was applied to compare muscle-tendon unit shortening tests between groups. Results: The tests showed reliability that ranged from good to excellent (ICC > 0.8), except for the Thomas Test for the bi-articular hip flexor muscle-tendon unit of the TD group (ICC = 0.7). Differences between groups were found in all tests (p < 0.05), except when the range of motion of the bi-articular hip flexor muscles was assessed using theThomas test (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Children with SD presents a smaller range of motion than the TD group.However, the Thomas Test for the bi-articular hip flexor muscles was unable to determine differences between children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy from that with typical development.Editora PUCPRESS2017-09-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2171210.1590/0103-5150.028.001.AO01Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 28 n. 1 (2015)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21712/20832Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibas Mélo, TaináRodacki, André Luiz FélixBittencourt Guimarães, Ana TerezaIsrael, Vera Lúcia2022-03-07T19:01:16Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21712Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:01:16Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
title Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
spellingShingle Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
Ribas Mélo, Tainá
title_short Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
title_full Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
title_fullStr Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
title_sort Repeatability and comparison of clinical tests in children with spastic diplegia and with typical development
author Ribas Mélo, Tainá
author_facet Ribas Mélo, Tainá
Rodacki, André Luiz Félix
Bittencourt Guimarães, Ana Tereza
Israel, Vera Lúcia
author_role author
author2 Rodacki, André Luiz Félix
Bittencourt Guimarães, Ana Tereza
Israel, Vera Lúcia
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribas Mélo, Tainá
Rodacki, André Luiz Félix
Bittencourt Guimarães, Ana Tereza
Israel, Vera Lúcia
description Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the reliability of three range of motion tests (Straight LegRaise, Modified Thomas, and Duncan-Ely) using photographic measurements in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (SD) and with typical development (TD). Methods: A cross-sectional test-retest design was applied to compare muscle-tendon unit shortening tests between groups. Results: The tests showed reliability that ranged from good to excellent (ICC > 0.8), except for the Thomas Test for the bi-articular hip flexor muscle-tendon unit of the TD group (ICC = 0.7). Differences between groups were found in all tests (p < 0.05), except when the range of motion of the bi-articular hip flexor muscles was assessed using theThomas test (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Children with SD presents a smaller range of motion than the TD group.However, the Thomas Test for the bi-articular hip flexor muscles was unable to determine differences between children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy from that with typical development.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21712
10.1590/0103-5150.028.001.AO01
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21712
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-5150.028.001.AO01
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21712/20832
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 28 No. 1 (2015)
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 28 n. 1 (2015)
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138747225210880

Registros relacionados