Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fujimaki de Paula, Letícia
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Gabriela Cabral Silva, Raíssa, Fernandes Andres, Letícia, Guarda Korelo, Raciele Ivandra
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21960
Resumo: Introduction: Low back pain in pregnancy is highly prevalent and multifactorial. However, it is still unclear if the back pain is associated with functional kinetic changes that occur during pregnancy. Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of low back pain in pregnancy and to investigate the association of low back pain disability with intensity, pain origin and kinesilogic dysfunction (range of motion of the lumbar spine, lumbar flexibility and trunk mobility). Methods: Women (n = 32) with gestational age equal or less than 20 weeks, assisted in one health centers on the coast of Paraná. Obstetric and historical lumbopelvic of pain, musculoskeletal discomfort, intensity lumbopelvic pain, low back disability, the source of pain through specific clinical trials, joint range of motion of the lumbar spine, the lumbar flexibility and general mobility of the trunk were evaluated. Results: The lumbar region was the most reported and higher frequency (p = 0.000) for the occurrence of musculoskeletal discomforts. The prevalence of lumbopelvic pain was 93.8%. Most reported the first episode after the 14th week of pregnancy (90%), on a daily frequency (63.3%), high intensity (50%), limiting the activities of daily living (50%) and generating low back disability (moderate to severe in 56.9%). Lumbar disability levels were significantly correlated to gestational age (r = 0.353), pain intensity (r = 0.402), positive results in clinical trials (except for the Lasègue test), range of motion for flexion (r = -0.280) and lumbar extension (r = -0.301), lumbar flexibility (r = -0.371) and general mobility trunk (r = 0.503). Conclusion: The greater gestational age, the greater intensity of pain, positivity in clinical trials, decreased range of motion, flexibility and lumbar trunk mobility constitute major lumbar disability.
id PUC_PR-26_26d54bf44f79a6fd8bd681181af7e58f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21960
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancyIntroduction: Low back pain in pregnancy is highly prevalent and multifactorial. However, it is still unclear if the back pain is associated with functional kinetic changes that occur during pregnancy. Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of low back pain in pregnancy and to investigate the association of low back pain disability with intensity, pain origin and kinesilogic dysfunction (range of motion of the lumbar spine, lumbar flexibility and trunk mobility). Methods: Women (n = 32) with gestational age equal or less than 20 weeks, assisted in one health centers on the coast of Paraná. Obstetric and historical lumbopelvic of pain, musculoskeletal discomfort, intensity lumbopelvic pain, low back disability, the source of pain through specific clinical trials, joint range of motion of the lumbar spine, the lumbar flexibility and general mobility of the trunk were evaluated. Results: The lumbar region was the most reported and higher frequency (p = 0.000) for the occurrence of musculoskeletal discomforts. The prevalence of lumbopelvic pain was 93.8%. Most reported the first episode after the 14th week of pregnancy (90%), on a daily frequency (63.3%), high intensity (50%), limiting the activities of daily living (50%) and generating low back disability (moderate to severe in 56.9%). Lumbar disability levels were significantly correlated to gestational age (r = 0.353), pain intensity (r = 0.402), positive results in clinical trials (except for the Lasègue test), range of motion for flexion (r = -0.280) and lumbar extension (r = -0.301), lumbar flexibility (r = -0.371) and general mobility trunk (r = 0.503). Conclusion: The greater gestational age, the greater intensity of pain, positivity in clinical trials, decreased range of motion, flexibility and lumbar trunk mobility constitute major lumbar disability.Editora PUCPRESS2017-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2196010.1590/1980-5918.030.003.AO05Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 3 (2017)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 3 (2017)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21960/21096Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFujimaki de Paula, LetíciaGabriela Cabral Silva, RaíssaFernandes Andres, LetíciaGuarda Korelo, Raciele Ivandra2022-03-07T19:01:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21960Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:01:52Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
title Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
spellingShingle Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
Fujimaki de Paula, Letícia
title_short Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
title_full Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
title_fullStr Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
title_sort Association between kinesiologic dysfunctions, lumbar disability and lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy
author Fujimaki de Paula, Letícia
author_facet Fujimaki de Paula, Letícia
Gabriela Cabral Silva, Raíssa
Fernandes Andres, Letícia
Guarda Korelo, Raciele Ivandra
author_role author
author2 Gabriela Cabral Silva, Raíssa
Fernandes Andres, Letícia
Guarda Korelo, Raciele Ivandra
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fujimaki de Paula, Letícia
Gabriela Cabral Silva, Raíssa
Fernandes Andres, Letícia
Guarda Korelo, Raciele Ivandra
description Introduction: Low back pain in pregnancy is highly prevalent and multifactorial. However, it is still unclear if the back pain is associated with functional kinetic changes that occur during pregnancy. Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of low back pain in pregnancy and to investigate the association of low back pain disability with intensity, pain origin and kinesilogic dysfunction (range of motion of the lumbar spine, lumbar flexibility and trunk mobility). Methods: Women (n = 32) with gestational age equal or less than 20 weeks, assisted in one health centers on the coast of Paraná. Obstetric and historical lumbopelvic of pain, musculoskeletal discomfort, intensity lumbopelvic pain, low back disability, the source of pain through specific clinical trials, joint range of motion of the lumbar spine, the lumbar flexibility and general mobility of the trunk were evaluated. Results: The lumbar region was the most reported and higher frequency (p = 0.000) for the occurrence of musculoskeletal discomforts. The prevalence of lumbopelvic pain was 93.8%. Most reported the first episode after the 14th week of pregnancy (90%), on a daily frequency (63.3%), high intensity (50%), limiting the activities of daily living (50%) and generating low back disability (moderate to severe in 56.9%). Lumbar disability levels were significantly correlated to gestational age (r = 0.353), pain intensity (r = 0.402), positive results in clinical trials (except for the Lasègue test), range of motion for flexion (r = -0.280) and lumbar extension (r = -0.301), lumbar flexibility (r = -0.371) and general mobility trunk (r = 0.503). Conclusion: The greater gestational age, the greater intensity of pain, positivity in clinical trials, decreased range of motion, flexibility and lumbar trunk mobility constitute major lumbar disability.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21960
10.1590/1980-5918.030.003.AO05
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21960
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-5918.030.003.AO05
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21960/21096
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 3 (2017)
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 3 (2017)
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138748072460288