Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Martins de Toledo, Aline, Christofoletti, Gustavo, de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz, Rosa Cardoso, Jefferson, Simprini Padula, Rosimeire
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21587
Resumo: Introduction: Complaints and musculoskeletal discomforts are common manifestations of individuals affected by work-related disorders (WRMD), and the influence of individual and/or psychosocial risk factors may play a significant role in WRMD development. Objective: To evaluate and to compare work engagement (WE) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and to assess the association between indexes of WE and RPE among healthcare workers. Materials and methods: Seventeen female subjects (36 ± 11 years, 1.58 ± 0.06 m and 59 ± 9 kg) participated, all officially employed on a nonprofit agency. The Nordic Questionnaire was used to evaluate musculoskeletal complaints and the Borg Scale used to evaluate the RPE. The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale quantified WE (vigor, dedication and absorption domains). Participants were divided into two groups, according to their sectors: healthcare clinics and institution for the elderly. The independent student t test was used to verify differences between groups and the chi-square test to verify associations between variables. Results: All subjects reported musculoskeletal complaints, mainly in the low back (58%). RPE did not differ between groups, while in the vigor, it was found a significant statistically difference (p = 0.035). An association between RPE and vigor and RPE and dedication was establish (p = 0.02 and p = 0.036, respectively). Conclusion: The association between WE and RPE suggests that workers with lower indexes of vigor and dedication may perceive greater physical demand, which can be imposed by work demands.
id PUC_PR-26_5f3e479f463a6d9b94862c594d5e2b50
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21587
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workersIntroduction: Complaints and musculoskeletal discomforts are common manifestations of individuals affected by work-related disorders (WRMD), and the influence of individual and/or psychosocial risk factors may play a significant role in WRMD development. Objective: To evaluate and to compare work engagement (WE) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and to assess the association between indexes of WE and RPE among healthcare workers. Materials and methods: Seventeen female subjects (36 ± 11 years, 1.58 ± 0.06 m and 59 ± 9 kg) participated, all officially employed on a nonprofit agency. The Nordic Questionnaire was used to evaluate musculoskeletal complaints and the Borg Scale used to evaluate the RPE. The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale quantified WE (vigor, dedication and absorption domains). Participants were divided into two groups, according to their sectors: healthcare clinics and institution for the elderly. The independent student t test was used to verify differences between groups and the chi-square test to verify associations between variables. Results: All subjects reported musculoskeletal complaints, mainly in the low back (58%). RPE did not differ between groups, while in the vigor, it was found a significant statistically difference (p = 0.035). An association between RPE and vigor and RPE and dedication was establish (p = 0.02 and p = 0.036, respectively). Conclusion: The association between WE and RPE suggests that workers with lower indexes of vigor and dedication may perceive greater physical demand, which can be imposed by work demands.Editora PUCPRESS2017-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2158710.1590/S0103-51502013000300011Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 26 No. 3 (2013)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 26 n. 3 (2013)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21587/20693Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarregaro, Rodrigo LuizMartins de Toledo, AlineChristofoletti, Gustavode Oliveira, Ana BeatrizRosa Cardoso, JeffersonSimprini Padula, Rosimeire2022-03-07T19:00:54Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21587Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:00:54Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
title Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
spellingShingle Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
title_short Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
title_full Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
title_fullStr Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
title_sort Association between work engagement and perceived exertion among healthcare workers
author Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
author_facet Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Martins de Toledo, Aline
Christofoletti, Gustavo
de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz
Rosa Cardoso, Jefferson
Simprini Padula, Rosimeire
author_role author
author2 Martins de Toledo, Aline
Christofoletti, Gustavo
de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz
Rosa Cardoso, Jefferson
Simprini Padula, Rosimeire
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Martins de Toledo, Aline
Christofoletti, Gustavo
de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz
Rosa Cardoso, Jefferson
Simprini Padula, Rosimeire
description Introduction: Complaints and musculoskeletal discomforts are common manifestations of individuals affected by work-related disorders (WRMD), and the influence of individual and/or psychosocial risk factors may play a significant role in WRMD development. Objective: To evaluate and to compare work engagement (WE) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and to assess the association between indexes of WE and RPE among healthcare workers. Materials and methods: Seventeen female subjects (36 ± 11 years, 1.58 ± 0.06 m and 59 ± 9 kg) participated, all officially employed on a nonprofit agency. The Nordic Questionnaire was used to evaluate musculoskeletal complaints and the Borg Scale used to evaluate the RPE. The Utrecht Work Engagement Scale quantified WE (vigor, dedication and absorption domains). Participants were divided into two groups, according to their sectors: healthcare clinics and institution for the elderly. The independent student t test was used to verify differences between groups and the chi-square test to verify associations between variables. Results: All subjects reported musculoskeletal complaints, mainly in the low back (58%). RPE did not differ between groups, while in the vigor, it was found a significant statistically difference (p = 0.035). An association between RPE and vigor and RPE and dedication was establish (p = 0.02 and p = 0.036, respectively). Conclusion: The association between WE and RPE suggests that workers with lower indexes of vigor and dedication may perceive greater physical demand, which can be imposed by work demands.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21587
10.1590/S0103-51502013000300011
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21587
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-51502013000300011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21587/20693
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 26 No. 3 (2013)
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 26 n. 3 (2013)
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138746714554368