Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22186 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The hip muscles play an important role in controlling the transverse and frontal plane of the femur during displacement. The hip extension and abduction/adduction exercises are among the most widely evaluated protocols both clinically and in research. Objective: To compare which assessment protocol in an isokinetic strength regime (distal grip-ankle vs. proximal grip-knee) best represents the action of hip extension and to analyze the test-retest reliability in the variables peak force (PF) and work (W). Methods: A total of 20 subjects participated in this research. All participants were female. The mean and standard deviations of age, weight and height were 21 ± 3.9 years, 65 ± 11 kg, 166 ± 3.4 cm, respectively. Results: Significant differences were found in both variables (PF and W) between protocols 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) on assessment days 1 and 2. No differences between days 1 and day 2 in either protocol (p < 0.05) were found. Index values of interclass correlation (ICC) of protocol 1 ranged between 0.38 and 0.86. In protocol 2 the ICC range was between 0.33 and 0.87. Conclusions: In light of these results, the hip extension exercise with a proximal grip best represents the strength of the muscle groups involved in this action. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_8161aa2f8a72269cc2cb5c2fafc2a64b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/22186 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extensionIntroduction: The hip muscles play an important role in controlling the transverse and frontal plane of the femur during displacement. The hip extension and abduction/adduction exercises are among the most widely evaluated protocols both clinically and in research. Objective: To compare which assessment protocol in an isokinetic strength regime (distal grip-ankle vs. proximal grip-knee) best represents the action of hip extension and to analyze the test-retest reliability in the variables peak force (PF) and work (W). Methods: A total of 20 subjects participated in this research. All participants were female. The mean and standard deviations of age, weight and height were 21 ± 3.9 years, 65 ± 11 kg, 166 ± 3.4 cm, respectively. Results: Significant differences were found in both variables (PF and W) between protocols 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) on assessment days 1 and 2. No differences between days 1 and day 2 in either protocol (p < 0.05) were found. Index values of interclass correlation (ICC) of protocol 1 ranged between 0.38 and 0.86. In protocol 2 the ICC range was between 0.33 and 0.87. Conclusions: In light of these results, the hip extension exercise with a proximal grip best represents the strength of the muscle groups involved in this action.Editora PUCPRESS2017-10-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2218610.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AO14Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 1 (2017)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22186/21266Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampos Jara, ChristianChirosa Ríos, Luis JavierJerez Mayorga, DanielChirosa Rios, IgnacioMartínez Salazar, CristianBeraldo, Pedro Cesar2022-03-07T19:01:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/22186Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:01:59Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
title |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension Campos Jara, Christian |
title_short |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
title_full |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
title_sort |
Comparison of two incremental protocols for evaluation of hip extension |
author |
Campos Jara, Christian |
author_facet |
Campos Jara, Christian Chirosa Ríos, Luis Javier Jerez Mayorga, Daniel Chirosa Rios, Ignacio Martínez Salazar, Cristian Beraldo, Pedro Cesar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Chirosa Ríos, Luis Javier Jerez Mayorga, Daniel Chirosa Rios, Ignacio Martínez Salazar, Cristian Beraldo, Pedro Cesar |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Campos Jara, Christian Chirosa Ríos, Luis Javier Jerez Mayorga, Daniel Chirosa Rios, Ignacio Martínez Salazar, Cristian Beraldo, Pedro Cesar |
description |
Introduction: The hip muscles play an important role in controlling the transverse and frontal plane of the femur during displacement. The hip extension and abduction/adduction exercises are among the most widely evaluated protocols both clinically and in research. Objective: To compare which assessment protocol in an isokinetic strength regime (distal grip-ankle vs. proximal grip-knee) best represents the action of hip extension and to analyze the test-retest reliability in the variables peak force (PF) and work (W). Methods: A total of 20 subjects participated in this research. All participants were female. The mean and standard deviations of age, weight and height were 21 ± 3.9 years, 65 ± 11 kg, 166 ± 3.4 cm, respectively. Results: Significant differences were found in both variables (PF and W) between protocols 1 and 2 (p < 0.05) on assessment days 1 and 2. No differences between days 1 and day 2 in either protocol (p < 0.05) were found. Index values of interclass correlation (ICC) of protocol 1 ranged between 0.38 and 0.86. In protocol 2 the ICC range was between 0.33 and 0.87. Conclusions: In light of these results, the hip extension exercise with a proximal grip best represents the strength of the muscle groups involved in this action. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22186 10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AO14 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22186 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1980-5918.030.001.AO14 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/22186/21266 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 30 No. 1 (2017) Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 30 n. 1 (2017) 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138748132229120 |