Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, frequently seen in women. Conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome focuses on control of symptoms and the nervous path, due to the possibility of double compression. Objective: To assess whether a protocol with emphasis on motor control techniques, including segmental cervical stabilization and neural mobilization, has better results in mechanical reorganization and reduction of symptoms when compared with classic therapeutic exercise techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, involving 11 women with an average age of 54 (± 6) years, allocated to either a classical kinesiotherapy group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The intervention spanned 12 weeks, with assessments prior to and following therapy, using the monofilament test, handgrip dynamometer, and BCTQ, DASH, and PRWE questionnaires. All normally distributed data was analysed with Student’s T-tests. Results: Both groups exhibited an increase in grip strength and relief of symptoms with improved functionality. There was a significant reduction in sensitivity noted in the CG group, and a significant increase in grip strength observed in the EG group. Conclusion: The experimental protocol group exhibited better results in mechanical reorganization, reflected in increased strength, sensitivity, and improved functionality, when compared to the group with conventional therapeutic exercise, but without the same symptomatic reduction. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_8b1883665cf63537dd984271547eb3a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21867 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilizationIntroduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, frequently seen in women. Conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome focuses on control of symptoms and the nervous path, due to the possibility of double compression. Objective: To assess whether a protocol with emphasis on motor control techniques, including segmental cervical stabilization and neural mobilization, has better results in mechanical reorganization and reduction of symptoms when compared with classic therapeutic exercise techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, involving 11 women with an average age of 54 (± 6) years, allocated to either a classical kinesiotherapy group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The intervention spanned 12 weeks, with assessments prior to and following therapy, using the monofilament test, handgrip dynamometer, and BCTQ, DASH, and PRWE questionnaires. All normally distributed data was analysed with Student’s T-tests. Results: Both groups exhibited an increase in grip strength and relief of symptoms with improved functionality. There was a significant reduction in sensitivity noted in the CG group, and a significant increase in grip strength observed in the EG group. Conclusion: The experimental protocol group exhibited better results in mechanical reorganization, reflected in increased strength, sensitivity, and improved functionality, when compared to the group with conventional therapeutic exercise, but without the same symptomatic reduction.Editora PUCPRESS2017-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2186710.1590/0103-5150.029.003.AO15Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 29 n. 3 (2016)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867/21003Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFedrigo Moraes, DavidPessina Gasparini, Andréa LicreSertório Grecco, Marco AurélioNeves Almeida, Nathalia HelenCassin Mainardi, TamirisMartinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues2022-03-07T19:01:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21867Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:01:45Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
title |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
spellingShingle |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization Fedrigo Moraes, David |
title_short |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
title_full |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
title_fullStr |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
title_sort |
Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization |
author |
Fedrigo Moraes, David |
author_facet |
Fedrigo Moraes, David Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fedrigo Moraes, David Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues |
description |
Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, frequently seen in women. Conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome focuses on control of symptoms and the nervous path, due to the possibility of double compression. Objective: To assess whether a protocol with emphasis on motor control techniques, including segmental cervical stabilization and neural mobilization, has better results in mechanical reorganization and reduction of symptoms when compared with classic therapeutic exercise techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, involving 11 women with an average age of 54 (± 6) years, allocated to either a classical kinesiotherapy group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The intervention spanned 12 weeks, with assessments prior to and following therapy, using the monofilament test, handgrip dynamometer, and BCTQ, DASH, and PRWE questionnaires. All normally distributed data was analysed with Student’s T-tests. Results: Both groups exhibited an increase in grip strength and relief of symptoms with improved functionality. There was a significant reduction in sensitivity noted in the CG group, and a significant increase in grip strength observed in the EG group. Conclusion: The experimental protocol group exhibited better results in mechanical reorganization, reflected in increased strength, sensitivity, and improved functionality, when compared to the group with conventional therapeutic exercise, but without the same symptomatic reduction. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867 10.1590/0103-5150.029.003.AO15 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-5150.029.003.AO15 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867/21003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016) Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 29 n. 3 (2016) 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138747998011392 |