Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fedrigo Moraes, David
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre, Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio, Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen, Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris, Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867
Resumo: Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, frequently seen in women. Conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome focuses on control of symptoms and the nervous path, due to the possibility of double compression. Objective: To assess whether a protocol with emphasis on motor control techniques, including segmental cervical stabilization and neural mobilization, has better results in mechanical reorganization and reduction of symptoms when compared with classic therapeutic exercise techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, involving 11 women with an average age of 54 (± 6) years, allocated to either a classical kinesiotherapy group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The intervention spanned 12 weeks, with assessments prior to and following therapy, using the monofilament test, handgrip dynamometer, and BCTQ, DASH, and PRWE questionnaires. All normally distributed data was analysed with Student’s T-tests. Results: Both groups exhibited an increase in grip strength and relief of symptoms with improved functionality. There was a significant reduction in sensitivity noted in the CG group, and a significant increase in grip strength observed in the EG group. Conclusion: The experimental protocol group exhibited better results in mechanical reorganization, reflected in increased strength, sensitivity, and improved functionality, when compared to the group with conventional therapeutic exercise, but without the same symptomatic reduction.
id PUC_PR-26_8b1883665cf63537dd984271547eb3a3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21867
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilizationIntroduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, frequently seen in women. Conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome focuses on control of symptoms and the nervous path, due to the possibility of double compression. Objective: To assess whether a protocol with emphasis on motor control techniques, including segmental cervical stabilization and neural mobilization, has better results in mechanical reorganization and reduction of symptoms when compared with classic therapeutic exercise techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, involving 11 women with an average age of 54 (± 6) years, allocated to either a classical kinesiotherapy group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The intervention spanned 12 weeks, with assessments prior to and following therapy, using the monofilament test, handgrip dynamometer, and BCTQ, DASH, and PRWE questionnaires. All normally distributed data was analysed with Student’s T-tests. Results: Both groups exhibited an increase in grip strength and relief of symptoms with improved functionality. There was a significant reduction in sensitivity noted in the CG group, and a significant increase in grip strength observed in the EG group. Conclusion: The experimental protocol group exhibited better results in mechanical reorganization, reflected in increased strength, sensitivity, and improved functionality, when compared to the group with conventional therapeutic exercise, but without the same symptomatic reduction.Editora PUCPRESS2017-09-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2186710.1590/0103-5150.029.003.AO15Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016)Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 29 n. 3 (2016)1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867/21003Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFedrigo Moraes, DavidPessina Gasparini, Andréa LicreSertório Grecco, Marco AurélioNeves Almeida, Nathalia HelenCassin Mainardi, TamirisMartinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues2022-03-07T19:01:45Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/21867Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-03-07T19:01:45Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
title Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
spellingShingle Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
Fedrigo Moraes, David
title_short Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
title_full Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
title_fullStr Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
title_full_unstemmed Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
title_sort Carpal tunnel syndrome: mobilization and segmental stabilization
author Fedrigo Moraes, David
author_facet Fedrigo Moraes, David
Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre
Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio
Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen
Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris
Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre
Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio
Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen
Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris
Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fedrigo Moraes, David
Pessina Gasparini, Andréa Licre
Sertório Grecco, Marco Aurélio
Neves Almeida, Nathalia Helen
Cassin Mainardi, Tamiris
Martinho Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues
description Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, frequently seen in women. Conservative treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome focuses on control of symptoms and the nervous path, due to the possibility of double compression. Objective: To assess whether a protocol with emphasis on motor control techniques, including segmental cervical stabilization and neural mobilization, has better results in mechanical reorganization and reduction of symptoms when compared with classic therapeutic exercise techniques in the conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, involving 11 women with an average age of 54 (± 6) years, allocated to either a classical kinesiotherapy group (CG) or experimental group (EG). The intervention spanned 12 weeks, with assessments prior to and following therapy, using the monofilament test, handgrip dynamometer, and BCTQ, DASH, and PRWE questionnaires. All normally distributed data was analysed with Student’s T-tests. Results: Both groups exhibited an increase in grip strength and relief of symptoms with improved functionality. There was a significant reduction in sensitivity noted in the CG group, and a significant increase in grip strength observed in the EG group. Conclusion: The experimental protocol group exhibited better results in mechanical reorganization, reflected in increased strength, sensitivity, and improved functionality, when compared to the group with conventional therapeutic exercise, but without the same symptomatic reduction.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867
10.1590/0103-5150.029.003.AO15
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/0103-5150.029.003.AO15
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/21867/21003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 29 No. 3 (2016)
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 29 n. 3 (2016)
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138747998011392