Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pilling, Betiane Moreira
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Silva, Marcelle Guimarães, Santos, Ingrid, Giendruczak, Paula, Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397
Resumo: Introduction: Remote postural assessment, necessary during the pandemic, required strategies to replace its in-person counterpart. Objectives: Analyze the content validity of a protocol for Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) that includes three items, Postural Checklist, Rater’s Manual and Ratee’s Manual. Method: Six experts in postural assessment were invited to validate the content of the three items of the ARPE protocol and 10 laypersons evaluated the Ratee’s Manual. The validity questionnaire encompassed the protocol in general and each individual item, containing an area for suggestions from experts and laypersons. The responses of these raters were used to calculate the Content Validity Indexes (CVI). Results: Two rounds of evaluations were carried out with the experts and one with the laypersons. In the first round with the experts, the CVI ranged from 98.6 to 83%. Three aspects (description of head positioning, description of scapula and waist positioning in the frontal plane) required adjustments. In the first round with the laypersons and second round with the experts, the CVI was 100%. Conclusion: The 100% agreement between experts and laypersons regarding the content of the ARPE protocol confirms its content validity.
id PUC_PR-26_b8a9bbfaff4375326704c8fd2d521cbc
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/30397
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)Validação do protocolo de Avaliação Remota da Postura Estática (ARPE) Introduction: Remote postural assessment, necessary during the pandemic, required strategies to replace its in-person counterpart. Objectives: Analyze the content validity of a protocol for Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) that includes three items, Postural Checklist, Rater’s Manual and Ratee’s Manual. Method: Six experts in postural assessment were invited to validate the content of the three items of the ARPE protocol and 10 laypersons evaluated the Ratee’s Manual. The validity questionnaire encompassed the protocol in general and each individual item, containing an area for suggestions from experts and laypersons. The responses of these raters were used to calculate the Content Validity Indexes (CVI). Results: Two rounds of evaluations were carried out with the experts and one with the laypersons. In the first round with the experts, the CVI ranged from 98.6 to 83%. Three aspects (description of head positioning, description of scapula and waist positioning in the frontal plane) required adjustments. In the first round with the laypersons and second round with the experts, the CVI was 100%. Conclusion: The 100% agreement between experts and laypersons regarding the content of the ARPE protocol confirms its content validity.Introdução: A avaliação da postura por atendimento remoto, necessária durante o cenário pandêmico, exigiu estratégias para substituir a avaliação postural presencial. Objetivo: Realizar a validação de conteúdo de um protocolo de Avaliação Remota da Postura Estática (ARPE) que contempla três itens: checklist postural, manual do avaliador e manual do avaliado. Métodos: Seis especialistas em avaliação postural foram convidados para a validação de conteúdo dos três itens do protocolo ARPE e 10 leigos avaliaram o manual do avaliado. O questionário de validação englobava o protocolo em geral e cada item isolado, contendo espaço para sugestões dos especialistas e leigos. As respostas desses avaliadores foram utilizadas no cálculo dos índices de validade de conteúdo (IVCs). Resultados: Foram realizadas duas rodadas de avaliações com especialistas e uma com leigos. Na primeira rodada com os especialistas, os IVCs variaram de 98,6 a 83%.Três aspectos (descrição do posicionamento da cabeça, do posicionamento das escápulas e da “cintura” no plano frontal de costas) necessitaram de ajustes. Na primeira rodada com os leigos, os IVCs foram de 100%. Na segunda rodada com os especialistas, os IVCs foram de 100%. Conclusão: A concordância de 100% entre os especialistas e leigos sobre o conteúdo do protocolo ARPE confirma sua validade de conteúdo.Editora PUCPRESS2023-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/3039710.1590/fm.2023.36123Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 36 (2023): n. cont.Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 36 (2023): n. cont.1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRengporhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26204https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26205Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPilling, Betiane MoreiraSilva, Marcelle GuimarãesSantos, IngridGiendruczak, PaulaCandotti, Cláudia Tarragô2023-12-04T14:30:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/30397Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2023-12-04T14:30:26Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
Validação do protocolo de Avaliação Remota da Postura Estática (ARPE)
title Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
spellingShingle Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
Pilling, Betiane Moreira
title_short Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
title_full Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
title_fullStr Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
title_full_unstemmed Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
title_sort Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
author Pilling, Betiane Moreira
author_facet Pilling, Betiane Moreira
Silva, Marcelle Guimarães
Santos, Ingrid
Giendruczak, Paula
Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marcelle Guimarães
Santos, Ingrid
Giendruczak, Paula
Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pilling, Betiane Moreira
Silva, Marcelle Guimarães
Santos, Ingrid
Giendruczak, Paula
Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô
description Introduction: Remote postural assessment, necessary during the pandemic, required strategies to replace its in-person counterpart. Objectives: Analyze the content validity of a protocol for Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) that includes three items, Postural Checklist, Rater’s Manual and Ratee’s Manual. Method: Six experts in postural assessment were invited to validate the content of the three items of the ARPE protocol and 10 laypersons evaluated the Ratee’s Manual. The validity questionnaire encompassed the protocol in general and each individual item, containing an area for suggestions from experts and laypersons. The responses of these raters were used to calculate the Content Validity Indexes (CVI). Results: Two rounds of evaluations were carried out with the experts and one with the laypersons. In the first round with the experts, the CVI ranged from 98.6 to 83%. Three aspects (description of head positioning, description of scapula and waist positioning in the frontal plane) required adjustments. In the first round with the laypersons and second round with the experts, the CVI was 100%. Conclusion: The 100% agreement between experts and laypersons regarding the content of the ARPE protocol confirms its content validity.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397
10.1590/fm.2023.36123
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/fm.2023.36123
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26204
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26205
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 36 (2023): n. cont.
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 36 (2023): n. cont.
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138750016520192