Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Remote postural assessment, necessary during the pandemic, required strategies to replace its in-person counterpart. Objectives: Analyze the content validity of a protocol for Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) that includes three items, Postural Checklist, Rater’s Manual and Ratee’s Manual. Method: Six experts in postural assessment were invited to validate the content of the three items of the ARPE protocol and 10 laypersons evaluated the Ratee’s Manual. The validity questionnaire encompassed the protocol in general and each individual item, containing an area for suggestions from experts and laypersons. The responses of these raters were used to calculate the Content Validity Indexes (CVI). Results: Two rounds of evaluations were carried out with the experts and one with the laypersons. In the first round with the experts, the CVI ranged from 98.6 to 83%. Three aspects (description of head positioning, description of scapula and waist positioning in the frontal plane) required adjustments. In the first round with the laypersons and second round with the experts, the CVI was 100%. Conclusion: The 100% agreement between experts and laypersons regarding the content of the ARPE protocol confirms its content validity. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_b8a9bbfaff4375326704c8fd2d521cbc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/30397 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE)Validação do protocolo de Avaliação Remota da Postura Estática (ARPE) Introduction: Remote postural assessment, necessary during the pandemic, required strategies to replace its in-person counterpart. Objectives: Analyze the content validity of a protocol for Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) that includes three items, Postural Checklist, Rater’s Manual and Ratee’s Manual. Method: Six experts in postural assessment were invited to validate the content of the three items of the ARPE protocol and 10 laypersons evaluated the Ratee’s Manual. The validity questionnaire encompassed the protocol in general and each individual item, containing an area for suggestions from experts and laypersons. The responses of these raters were used to calculate the Content Validity Indexes (CVI). Results: Two rounds of evaluations were carried out with the experts and one with the laypersons. In the first round with the experts, the CVI ranged from 98.6 to 83%. Three aspects (description of head positioning, description of scapula and waist positioning in the frontal plane) required adjustments. In the first round with the laypersons and second round with the experts, the CVI was 100%. Conclusion: The 100% agreement between experts and laypersons regarding the content of the ARPE protocol confirms its content validity.Introdução: A avaliação da postura por atendimento remoto, necessária durante o cenário pandêmico, exigiu estratégias para substituir a avaliação postural presencial. Objetivo: Realizar a validação de conteúdo de um protocolo de Avaliação Remota da Postura Estática (ARPE) que contempla três itens: checklist postural, manual do avaliador e manual do avaliado. Métodos: Seis especialistas em avaliação postural foram convidados para a validação de conteúdo dos três itens do protocolo ARPE e 10 leigos avaliaram o manual do avaliado. O questionário de validação englobava o protocolo em geral e cada item isolado, contendo espaço para sugestões dos especialistas e leigos. As respostas desses avaliadores foram utilizadas no cálculo dos índices de validade de conteúdo (IVCs). Resultados: Foram realizadas duas rodadas de avaliações com especialistas e uma com leigos. Na primeira rodada com os especialistas, os IVCs variaram de 98,6 a 83%.Três aspectos (descrição do posicionamento da cabeça, do posicionamento das escápulas e da “cintura” no plano frontal de costas) necessitaram de ajustes. Na primeira rodada com os leigos, os IVCs foram de 100%. Na segunda rodada com os especialistas, os IVCs foram de 100%. Conclusão: A concordância de 100% entre os especialistas e leigos sobre o conteúdo do protocolo ARPE confirma sua validade de conteúdo.Editora PUCPRESS2023-07-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/3039710.1590/fm.2023.36123Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 36 (2023): n. cont.Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 36 (2023): n. cont.1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRengporhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26204https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26205Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPilling, Betiane MoreiraSilva, Marcelle GuimarãesSantos, IngridGiendruczak, PaulaCandotti, Cláudia Tarragô2023-12-04T14:30:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/30397Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2023-12-04T14:30:26Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) Validação do protocolo de Avaliação Remota da Postura Estática (ARPE) |
title |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) |
spellingShingle |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) Pilling, Betiane Moreira |
title_short |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) |
title_full |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) |
title_fullStr |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) |
title_sort |
Validity of a protocol for remote static posture assessment (ARPE) |
author |
Pilling, Betiane Moreira |
author_facet |
Pilling, Betiane Moreira Silva, Marcelle Guimarães Santos, Ingrid Giendruczak, Paula Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Marcelle Guimarães Santos, Ingrid Giendruczak, Paula Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pilling, Betiane Moreira Silva, Marcelle Guimarães Santos, Ingrid Giendruczak, Paula Candotti, Cláudia Tarragô |
description |
Introduction: Remote postural assessment, necessary during the pandemic, required strategies to replace its in-person counterpart. Objectives: Analyze the content validity of a protocol for Remote Static Posture Assessment (ARPE) that includes three items, Postural Checklist, Rater’s Manual and Ratee’s Manual. Method: Six experts in postural assessment were invited to validate the content of the three items of the ARPE protocol and 10 laypersons evaluated the Ratee’s Manual. The validity questionnaire encompassed the protocol in general and each individual item, containing an area for suggestions from experts and laypersons. The responses of these raters were used to calculate the Content Validity Indexes (CVI). Results: Two rounds of evaluations were carried out with the experts and one with the laypersons. In the first round with the experts, the CVI ranged from 98.6 to 83%. Three aspects (description of head positioning, description of scapula and waist positioning in the frontal plane) required adjustments. In the first round with the laypersons and second round with the experts, the CVI was 100%. Conclusion: The 100% agreement between experts and laypersons regarding the content of the ARPE protocol confirms its content validity. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397 10.1590/fm.2023.36123 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/fm.2023.36123 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26204 https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30397/26205 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 36 (2023): n. cont. Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 36 (2023): n. cont. 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138750016520192 |