Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Fisioterapia em Movimento |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30489 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the frequent traumatic injuries of the knee joint complex, and the isokinetic dynamometer is essential to assess and measure its joint function. Objective: To analyze the volume of physical therapy treatment using the same protocol with different duration in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study. The sample consisted of 13 adult male individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were divided into two groups: accelerated treatment (AC) and non-accelerated treatment (NAC). Participants underwent a standardized protocol of post-reconstruction physiotherapy, starting in the immediate postoperative period. The AC group performed the treatment three times a week, with a duration of 4 hours each session for 6 months, while the NAC performed twice a week with duration of two hours each session for eight months. Results: The groups showed the same behavior during the post-reconstruction treatment periods, showing that regardless of time, the results are beneficial at the end of the treatment. However, in the accelerated protocol, the injured limb showed a significant difference for PTEXT in the preoperative and 4-month postoperative period (230.5 vs 182.6), 4-month postoperative period and final (182.6 vs 242.1) in the AC group, while in the NAC group there was no significant difference between times in this same limb. Conclusion: Greater volumes of weekly training characterized better results, showing that rehabilitation time is not a predictor of discharge, but rehabilitation time obtains good results for the variables. |
id |
PUC_PR-26_e828ab750fda0b1ecbc9668b12394c2c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/30489 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-26 |
network_name_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot studyVolumes finais de reabilitação influenciam função após reconstrução de ligamento cruzado anterior? Um estudo pilotoIntroduction: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the frequent traumatic injuries of the knee joint complex, and the isokinetic dynamometer is essential to assess and measure its joint function. Objective: To analyze the volume of physical therapy treatment using the same protocol with different duration in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study. The sample consisted of 13 adult male individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were divided into two groups: accelerated treatment (AC) and non-accelerated treatment (NAC). Participants underwent a standardized protocol of post-reconstruction physiotherapy, starting in the immediate postoperative period. The AC group performed the treatment three times a week, with a duration of 4 hours each session for 6 months, while the NAC performed twice a week with duration of two hours each session for eight months. Results: The groups showed the same behavior during the post-reconstruction treatment periods, showing that regardless of time, the results are beneficial at the end of the treatment. However, in the accelerated protocol, the injured limb showed a significant difference for PTEXT in the preoperative and 4-month postoperative period (230.5 vs 182.6), 4-month postoperative period and final (182.6 vs 242.1) in the AC group, while in the NAC group there was no significant difference between times in this same limb. Conclusion: Greater volumes of weekly training characterized better results, showing that rehabilitation time is not a predictor of discharge, but rehabilitation time obtains good results for the variables.Introdução: A ruptura do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) é uma das lesões traumáticas frequentes do complexo articular do joelho, sendo o dinamômetro isocinético fundamental para avaliar e mensurar sua função articular. Objetivo: Analisar o volume de tratamento fisioterapêutico utilizando o mesmo protocolo com diferentes durações em pacientes submetidos à reconstrução do LCA. Métodos: Trata-se de um estudo de coorte observacional prospectivo. A amostra foi composta por 13 indivíduos adultos do sexo masculino submetidos à cirurgia de reconstrução do LCA. Os participantes foram divididos em dois grupos: tratamento acelerado (AC) e tratamento não acelerado (NAC). Os participantes foram submetidos a um protocolo padronizado de fisioterapia pós-reconstrução, com início no pós-operatório imediato. O grupo AC realizou o tratamento três vezes por semana, com duração de 4 horas cada sessão durante 6 meses, enquanto o grupo NAC realizou duas vezes por semana, com duração de duas horas cada sessão, durante oito meses. Resultados: Os grupos apresentaram o mesmo comportamento durante os períodos de tratamento pós-reconstrução, mostrando que independente do tempo, os resultados são benéficos ao final do tratamento. No protocolo acelerado, porém, o membro lesionado apresentou diferença significativa para PTEXT no pré-operatório e pós-operatório de 4 meses (230,5 vs 182,6), pós-operatório de 4 meses e final (182,6 vs 242,1) no grupo AC, enquanto no NAC não houve diferença significativa entre os tempos neste mesmo membro. Conclusão: Maiores volumes de treinamento semanal caracterizaram melhores resultados, mostrando que o tempo de reabilitação não é preditor de alta, mas o tempo de reabilitação obtém bons resultados para as variáveis.Editora PUCPRESS2023-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/3048910.1590/fm.2023.36125Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 36 (2023): n. cont.Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 36 (2023): n. cont.1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30489/26225Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Souza, Rafaela MariaTiburcio, Afonso de Mello Claudio, Ana Carolina de JacomoMicheletti, Jéssica KirschMenossi, Berlis Ribeiro dos Santos2023-12-04T14:30:26Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/30489Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2023-12-04T14:30:26Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study Volumes finais de reabilitação influenciam função após reconstrução de ligamento cruzado anterior? Um estudo piloto |
title |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study |
spellingShingle |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study de Souza, Rafaela Maria |
title_short |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study |
title_full |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study |
title_fullStr |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study |
title_sort |
Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study |
author |
de Souza, Rafaela Maria |
author_facet |
de Souza, Rafaela Maria Tiburcio, Afonso de Mello Claudio, Ana Carolina de Jacomo Micheletti, Jéssica Kirsch Menossi, Berlis Ribeiro dos Santos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tiburcio, Afonso de Mello Claudio, Ana Carolina de Jacomo Micheletti, Jéssica Kirsch Menossi, Berlis Ribeiro dos Santos |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Souza, Rafaela Maria Tiburcio, Afonso de Mello Claudio, Ana Carolina de Jacomo Micheletti, Jéssica Kirsch Menossi, Berlis Ribeiro dos Santos |
description |
Introduction: Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the frequent traumatic injuries of the knee joint complex, and the isokinetic dynamometer is essential to assess and measure its joint function. Objective: To analyze the volume of physical therapy treatment using the same protocol with different duration in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study. The sample consisted of 13 adult male individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were divided into two groups: accelerated treatment (AC) and non-accelerated treatment (NAC). Participants underwent a standardized protocol of post-reconstruction physiotherapy, starting in the immediate postoperative period. The AC group performed the treatment three times a week, with a duration of 4 hours each session for 6 months, while the NAC performed twice a week with duration of two hours each session for eight months. Results: The groups showed the same behavior during the post-reconstruction treatment periods, showing that regardless of time, the results are beneficial at the end of the treatment. However, in the accelerated protocol, the injured limb showed a significant difference for PTEXT in the preoperative and 4-month postoperative period (230.5 vs 182.6), 4-month postoperative period and final (182.6 vs 242.1) in the AC group, while in the NAC group there was no significant difference between times in this same limb. Conclusion: Greater volumes of weekly training characterized better results, showing that rehabilitation time is not a predictor of discharge, but rehabilitation time obtains good results for the variables. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30489 10.1590/fm.2023.36125 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30489 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/fm.2023.36125 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/30489/26225 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 PUCPRESS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora PUCPRESS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 36 (2023): n. cont. Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 36 (2023): n. cont. 1980-5918 reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
collection |
Fisioterapia em Movimento |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1799138750032248832 |