Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fontes, Ana Paula
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Fisioterapia em Movimento
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826
Resumo: Introduction: Sex is one of the demographic characteristics that better differentiates the independence of the elderly, despite this distinction not being consensual. Objective: To know the differences in functioning associated with sex in elderly people aged ≥ 65 years according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Methods: This was an analytical and cross-sectional observational study with a sample of 451 subjects. The instruments were a sociodemographic questionnaire identical to a ICF checklist and the Biopsychosocial Assessment Method. The student t, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Spearman correlation tests were used considering p < 0.05. Results: The average age was between 79.5 ± 7.5 years with a female prevalence (62.1%). Of the 43 variables studied, sex differences were found in 17 (39.5%). In the personal factors, women showed greater vulnerability in conjugality (p ≤ 0.001), cohabitation (p = 0.037), and economic income (p = 0.002). Nonetheless, they showed healthier behaviors in all health-related habits. As for environmental factors and body functions, greater fragility was once again observed in women: the need for assistive devices (p ≤ 0.001) and urinary incontinence (p = 0.021). In activities/participation, differences were found in mobility, where women experienced more restrictions, whereas men were more dependent on washing/drying clothes in domestic life (p = 0.022). Conclusion: Women are more unprotected in social and economic areas, while men showed more vulnerability in habits related to health. These differences are linked to demographic issues related to longevity, cultural differences, and socialization, and differences regarding activities/participation tend to dilute between sexes.
id PUC_PR-26_ff263ddcbabf127984002185dc7621c2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/28826
network_acronym_str PUC_PR-26
network_name_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository_id_str
spelling Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?Ainda existem diferenças de sexo na funcionalidade dos idosos?Elderly. ICF. Frailty. Sex.Idoso. Classificação Internacional de FuncionalidadeIncapacidade e Saúde. Fragilidade. Sexo.Introduction: Sex is one of the demographic characteristics that better differentiates the independence of the elderly, despite this distinction not being consensual. Objective: To know the differences in functioning associated with sex in elderly people aged ≥ 65 years according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Methods: This was an analytical and cross-sectional observational study with a sample of 451 subjects. The instruments were a sociodemographic questionnaire identical to a ICF checklist and the Biopsychosocial Assessment Method. The student t, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Spearman correlation tests were used considering p < 0.05. Results: The average age was between 79.5 ± 7.5 years with a female prevalence (62.1%). Of the 43 variables studied, sex differences were found in 17 (39.5%). In the personal factors, women showed greater vulnerability in conjugality (p ≤ 0.001), cohabitation (p = 0.037), and economic income (p = 0.002). Nonetheless, they showed healthier behaviors in all health-related habits. As for environmental factors and body functions, greater fragility was once again observed in women: the need for assistive devices (p ≤ 0.001) and urinary incontinence (p = 0.021). In activities/participation, differences were found in mobility, where women experienced more restrictions, whereas men were more dependent on washing/drying clothes in domestic life (p = 0.022). Conclusion: Women are more unprotected in social and economic areas, while men showed more vulnerability in habits related to health. These differences are linked to demographic issues related to longevity, cultural differences, and socialization, and differences regarding activities/participation tend to dilute between sexes.Introdução: O sexo é das caraterísticas demográficas que mais diferencia a independência dos idosos, apesar dessa distinção não ser consensual. Objetivo: Conhecer as diferenças da funcionalidade associadas ao sexo, de acordo com a Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, em idosos com idade ≥ 65 anos. Métodos: Estudo observacional, analítico e transversal com uma amostra de 451 indivíduos. Os instrumentos foram um questionário sociodemográfico idêntico à checklist da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) e o Método de Avaliação Biopsicossocial. Utilizaram-se os testes de T-Student, Mann-Whitney, Qui-Quadrado e Correlação de Spearman, considerando-se p < 0,05. Resultados: A média de idade foi de 79,5 ± 7,5 anos, observando-se uma prevalência feminina (62,1%). Das 43 variáveis estudadas, foram encontradas diferenças no sexo em 17 (39,5%). Nos fatores pessoais, as mulheres apresentaram maior vulnerabilidade na conjugalidade (p ≤ 0,001), na coabitação (p = 0,037) e no rendimento econômico (p = 0,002). Em todos os hábitos relacionados com a saúde, contudo, revelaram comportamentos mais saudáveis. Nos fatores ambientais e nas funções do corpo, observou-se novamente maior fragilidade nas mulheres: na necessidade de dispositivos de auxílio (p ≤ 0,001) e na incontinência urinária (p = 0,021). Nas atividades/participação as mulheres apresentaram maior restrição na mobilidade e os homens na vida doméstica (lavar/secar roupa p = 0,022). Conclusão: As mulheres apresentam-se mais desprotegidas nas dimensões social e econômica, enquanto os homens manifestam hábitos de saúde mais vulneráveis. Estas diferenças estão ligadas às questões demográficas da longevidade e às diferenças culturais e de socialização. As diferenças nos domínios das atividades/participação tendem a diluir-se entre os sexos.Editora PUCPRESS2021-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/2882610.1590/fm.2022.35103Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 35 (2022): n. cont.Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 35 (2022): n. cont.1980-5918reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimentoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRengporhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826/25493Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFontes, Ana Paula2022-10-07T13:31:55Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/28826Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisioPRIhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/oairubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br1980-59180103-5150opendoar:2022-10-07T13:31:55Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
Ainda existem diferenças de sexo na funcionalidade dos idosos?
title Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
spellingShingle Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
Fontes, Ana Paula
Elderly. ICF. Frailty. Sex.
Idoso. Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade
Incapacidade e Saúde. Fragilidade. Sexo.
title_short Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
title_full Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
title_fullStr Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
title_full_unstemmed Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
title_sort Are there still sex differences in the functioning of the elderly?
author Fontes, Ana Paula
author_facet Fontes, Ana Paula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fontes, Ana Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Elderly. ICF. Frailty. Sex.
Idoso. Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade
Incapacidade e Saúde. Fragilidade. Sexo.
topic Elderly. ICF. Frailty. Sex.
Idoso. Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade
Incapacidade e Saúde. Fragilidade. Sexo.
description Introduction: Sex is one of the demographic characteristics that better differentiates the independence of the elderly, despite this distinction not being consensual. Objective: To know the differences in functioning associated with sex in elderly people aged ≥ 65 years according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Methods: This was an analytical and cross-sectional observational study with a sample of 451 subjects. The instruments were a sociodemographic questionnaire identical to a ICF checklist and the Biopsychosocial Assessment Method. The student t, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Spearman correlation tests were used considering p < 0.05. Results: The average age was between 79.5 ± 7.5 years with a female prevalence (62.1%). Of the 43 variables studied, sex differences were found in 17 (39.5%). In the personal factors, women showed greater vulnerability in conjugality (p ≤ 0.001), cohabitation (p = 0.037), and economic income (p = 0.002). Nonetheless, they showed healthier behaviors in all health-related habits. As for environmental factors and body functions, greater fragility was once again observed in women: the need for assistive devices (p ≤ 0.001) and urinary incontinence (p = 0.021). In activities/participation, differences were found in mobility, where women experienced more restrictions, whereas men were more dependent on washing/drying clothes in domestic life (p = 0.022). Conclusion: Women are more unprotected in social and economic areas, while men showed more vulnerability in habits related to health. These differences are linked to demographic issues related to longevity, cultural differences, and socialization, and differences regarding activities/participation tend to dilute between sexes.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826
10.1590/fm.2022.35103
url https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/fm.2022.35103
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826/pdf
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/fisio/article/view/28826/25493
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 PUCPRESS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora PUCPRESS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento (Physical Therapy in Movement); Vol. 35 (2022): n. cont.
Fisioterapia em Movimento; v. 35 (2022): n. cont.
1980-5918
reponame:Fisioterapia em Movimento
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron:PUC_PR
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
instacron_str PUC_PR
institution PUC_PR
reponame_str Fisioterapia em Movimento
collection Fisioterapia em Movimento
repository.name.fl_str_mv Fisioterapia em Movimento - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rubia.farias@pucpr.br||revista.fisioterapia@pucpr.br
_version_ 1799138749562486784