China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451 |
Resumo: | China’s construction of artificial islands during last few years has raised concerns about militarisation of the South China Sea threatening stability and security for littoral countries. China claims over 80 per cent of the South China Sea and it is building landing and garrison facilities over geographical features classified as rocks and coral reefs. China's claims are grounded on their supposed discovery and occupation of these features since antiquity. Other claimants, like the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Brunei and Indonesia, have their own historical narratives and cite articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to justify their sovereignty over part of this disputed maritime region. This multilateral nature of dispute makes it extremely complicated and China's increasingly assertive policies have further compounded it. Accordingly, several nations, including United States, have raised alarm regarding freedom of navigation across the South China Sea. It in this backdrop of rising tensions that this article examines these multiple narratives and what UNCLOS and the Permanent Court of Arbitration say in clarifying the legality of maritime rights to crystal gaze likely future trajectories. However, this study also recognizes that while UNCLOS remains at the core of maritime dispute settlement, it is the evolving geopolitics of Asia that will go a long way in guiding both the interpretation of UNCLOS as also state responses in terms of their proposals for joint development or unilateral strategies. |
id |
PUC_PR-28_e711ada6f8a3888910eb533faed121e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/7451 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_PR-28 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of lawsouth China seaartificial islandsUnited Nations Convention on the Law of the seaRule of LawSpratly Islands.China’s construction of artificial islands during last few years has raised concerns about militarisation of the South China Sea threatening stability and security for littoral countries. China claims over 80 per cent of the South China Sea and it is building landing and garrison facilities over geographical features classified as rocks and coral reefs. China's claims are grounded on their supposed discovery and occupation of these features since antiquity. Other claimants, like the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Brunei and Indonesia, have their own historical narratives and cite articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to justify their sovereignty over part of this disputed maritime region. This multilateral nature of dispute makes it extremely complicated and China's increasingly assertive policies have further compounded it. Accordingly, several nations, including United States, have raised alarm regarding freedom of navigation across the South China Sea. It in this backdrop of rising tensions that this article examines these multiple narratives and what UNCLOS and the Permanent Court of Arbitration say in clarifying the legality of maritime rights to crystal gaze likely future trajectories. However, this study also recognizes that while UNCLOS remains at the core of maritime dispute settlement, it is the evolving geopolitics of Asia that will go a long way in guiding both the interpretation of UNCLOS as also state responses in terms of their proposals for joint development or unilateral strategies.Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRess2017-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/745110.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i1.7451Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): January/April; 4-23Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2017): enero/abril; 4-23Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental; v. 8 n. 1 (2017): janeiro/abril; 4-232179-82142179-345X10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i1reponame:Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambientalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)instacron:PUC_PRenghttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451/17454Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambientalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSingh, SwaranYamamoto, Lilian2018-05-09T18:31:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.pucpr.br:article/7451Revistahttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomicoONGhttps://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/oai||nicolasadd@outlook.com|| revista.direito@pucpr.br2179-82142179-345Xopendoar:2018-05-09T18:31:06Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
title |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
spellingShingle |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law Singh, Swaran south China sea artificial islands United Nations Convention on the Law of the sea Rule of Law Spratly Islands. |
title_short |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
title_full |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
title_fullStr |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
title_full_unstemmed |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
title_sort |
China's artificial islands in the south China sea: geopolitics versus rule of law |
author |
Singh, Swaran |
author_facet |
Singh, Swaran Yamamoto, Lilian |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yamamoto, Lilian |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Singh, Swaran Yamamoto, Lilian |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
south China sea artificial islands United Nations Convention on the Law of the sea Rule of Law Spratly Islands. |
topic |
south China sea artificial islands United Nations Convention on the Law of the sea Rule of Law Spratly Islands. |
description |
China’s construction of artificial islands during last few years has raised concerns about militarisation of the South China Sea threatening stability and security for littoral countries. China claims over 80 per cent of the South China Sea and it is building landing and garrison facilities over geographical features classified as rocks and coral reefs. China's claims are grounded on their supposed discovery and occupation of these features since antiquity. Other claimants, like the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan, Brunei and Indonesia, have their own historical narratives and cite articles of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to justify their sovereignty over part of this disputed maritime region. This multilateral nature of dispute makes it extremely complicated and China's increasingly assertive policies have further compounded it. Accordingly, several nations, including United States, have raised alarm regarding freedom of navigation across the South China Sea. It in this backdrop of rising tensions that this article examines these multiple narratives and what UNCLOS and the Permanent Court of Arbitration say in clarifying the legality of maritime rights to crystal gaze likely future trajectories. However, this study also recognizes that while UNCLOS remains at the core of maritime dispute settlement, it is the evolving geopolitics of Asia that will go a long way in guiding both the interpretation of UNCLOS as also state responses in terms of their proposals for joint development or unilateral strategies. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451 10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i1.7451 |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i1.7451 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/direitoeconomico/article/view/7451/17454 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRess |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): January/April; 4-23 Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2017): enero/abril; 4-23 Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental; v. 8 n. 1 (2017): janeiro/abril; 4-23 2179-8214 2179-345X 10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v8i1 reponame:Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) instacron:PUC_PR |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
instacron_str |
PUC_PR |
institution |
PUC_PR |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental |
collection |
Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná (PUC-PR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||nicolasadd@outlook.com|| revista.direito@pucpr.br |
_version_ |
1798321243688009728 |