Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Contexto Internacional |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200319 |
Resumo: | Abstract This article proposes a theoretical framework for understanding Filipino president Rodrigo Duterte’s celebrated ‘pivot to China.’ It begins by discussing the model of asymmetric relations as a suitable framework for understanding relations between highly unequal states, and the concept of dual structural asymmetry as a means of theorising the triangular relations among the Philippines, the USA and China since the end of the Cold War. Next, it presents various economic and political indicators of the shift in Filipino foreign policy under Duterte. It goes on to propose a theoretical model for identifying the linkages between elements of political economy and international security from the perspective of Brantly Womack’s theory of asymmetry. Lastly, it presents three scenarios for resolving the territorial dispute in the South China Sea (SCS) between the Philippines and China: two with maximum gains for one country only, and a third with an acceptable result for both countries as a product of mutual concessions. |
id |
PUC_RIO-22_187fee23fc2095c3ed40151df84d9b9a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-85292018000200319 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RIO-22 |
network_name_str |
Contexto Internacional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea DisputesTheory of Asymmetrydouble structural asymmetrySouth China Sea DisputesFilipino Foreign PolicyFilipino-Sino relationsAbstract This article proposes a theoretical framework for understanding Filipino president Rodrigo Duterte’s celebrated ‘pivot to China.’ It begins by discussing the model of asymmetric relations as a suitable framework for understanding relations between highly unequal states, and the concept of dual structural asymmetry as a means of theorising the triangular relations among the Philippines, the USA and China since the end of the Cold War. Next, it presents various economic and political indicators of the shift in Filipino foreign policy under Duterte. It goes on to propose a theoretical model for identifying the linkages between elements of political economy and international security from the perspective of Brantly Womack’s theory of asymmetry. Lastly, it presents three scenarios for resolving the territorial dispute in the South China Sea (SCS) between the Philippines and China: two with maximum gains for one country only, and a third with an acceptable result for both countries as a product of mutual concessions.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2018-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200319Contexto Internacional v.40 n.2 2018reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2018400200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHendler,Brunoeng2018-09-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292018000200319Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2018-09-17T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
title |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
spellingShingle |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes Hendler,Bruno Theory of Asymmetry double structural asymmetry South China Sea Disputes Filipino Foreign Policy Filipino-Sino relations |
title_short |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
title_full |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
title_fullStr |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
title_sort |
Duterte’s Pivot to China, and Prospects for Settling the South China Sea Disputes |
author |
Hendler,Bruno |
author_facet |
Hendler,Bruno |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Hendler,Bruno |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Theory of Asymmetry double structural asymmetry South China Sea Disputes Filipino Foreign Policy Filipino-Sino relations |
topic |
Theory of Asymmetry double structural asymmetry South China Sea Disputes Filipino Foreign Policy Filipino-Sino relations |
description |
Abstract This article proposes a theoretical framework for understanding Filipino president Rodrigo Duterte’s celebrated ‘pivot to China.’ It begins by discussing the model of asymmetric relations as a suitable framework for understanding relations between highly unequal states, and the concept of dual structural asymmetry as a means of theorising the triangular relations among the Philippines, the USA and China since the end of the Cold War. Next, it presents various economic and political indicators of the shift in Filipino foreign policy under Duterte. It goes on to propose a theoretical model for identifying the linkages between elements of political economy and international security from the perspective of Brantly Womack’s theory of asymmetry. Lastly, it presents three scenarios for resolving the territorial dispute in the South China Sea (SCS) between the Philippines and China: two with maximum gains for one country only, and a third with an acceptable result for both countries as a product of mutual concessions. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200319 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292018000200319 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2018400200005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional v.40 n.2 2018 reponame:Contexto Internacional instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) instacron:PUC_RIO |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RIO |
institution |
PUC_RIO |
reponame_str |
Contexto Internacional |
collection |
Contexto Internacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br |
_version_ |
1752127872702611456 |