A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vreÿ,François
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Contexto Internacional
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200351
Resumo: Abstract Analysts frequently label the BRICS grouping of states (Brazil, India, Russia, China, and South Africa) as primarily an economic club emphasising economic performances as primary objectives. Co-operation of international groupings are rarely, if ever, set within the context of their access to maritime interests, security, and benefits. A second void stems from the lack of emphasis upon the economic benefits of secured maritime domains. In this vein, a common, but neglected aspect of the BRICS grouping’s power and future influence resides in their maritime domains, the value of which ultimately depends upon the responsible governance and use of ocean territories. The maritime interests of BRICS countries only become meaningful if reinforced by maritime security governance and co-operation in the respective oceans. Presently China and India seem to dominate the maritime stage of BRICS, but the South Atlantic is an often overlooked space. For BRICS the value of the South Atlantic stems from how it secures and unlocks the potential of this maritime space through co-operative ventures between Brazil, South Africa as a late BRICS partner, and West African littoral states in particular. Unfortunately, BRICS holds its own maritime tensions, as member countries also pursue competing interests at sea.
id PUC_RIO-22_1e3ddb0fcabd23ad82b3fa8d32911090
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-85292017000200351
network_acronym_str PUC_RIO-22
network_name_str Contexto Internacional
repository_id_str
spelling A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South AtlanticAfricaBrazilBRICSMaritime SecuritySouth AtlanticSouth AfricaAbstract Analysts frequently label the BRICS grouping of states (Brazil, India, Russia, China, and South Africa) as primarily an economic club emphasising economic performances as primary objectives. Co-operation of international groupings are rarely, if ever, set within the context of their access to maritime interests, security, and benefits. A second void stems from the lack of emphasis upon the economic benefits of secured maritime domains. In this vein, a common, but neglected aspect of the BRICS grouping’s power and future influence resides in their maritime domains, the value of which ultimately depends upon the responsible governance and use of ocean territories. The maritime interests of BRICS countries only become meaningful if reinforced by maritime security governance and co-operation in the respective oceans. Presently China and India seem to dominate the maritime stage of BRICS, but the South Atlantic is an often overlooked space. For BRICS the value of the South Atlantic stems from how it secures and unlocks the potential of this maritime space through co-operative ventures between Brazil, South Africa as a late BRICS partner, and West African littoral states in particular. Unfortunately, BRICS holds its own maritime tensions, as member countries also pursue competing interests at sea.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200351Contexto Internacional v.39 n.2 2017reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVreÿ,Françoiseng2017-06-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292017000200351Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2017-06-12T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
title A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
spellingShingle A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
Vreÿ,François
Africa
Brazil
BRICS
Maritime Security
South Atlantic
South Africa
title_short A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
title_full A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
title_fullStr A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
title_full_unstemmed A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
title_sort A Blue BRICS, Maritime Security, and the South Atlantic
author Vreÿ,François
author_facet Vreÿ,François
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vreÿ,François
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Africa
Brazil
BRICS
Maritime Security
South Atlantic
South Africa
topic Africa
Brazil
BRICS
Maritime Security
South Atlantic
South Africa
description Abstract Analysts frequently label the BRICS grouping of states (Brazil, India, Russia, China, and South Africa) as primarily an economic club emphasising economic performances as primary objectives. Co-operation of international groupings are rarely, if ever, set within the context of their access to maritime interests, security, and benefits. A second void stems from the lack of emphasis upon the economic benefits of secured maritime domains. In this vein, a common, but neglected aspect of the BRICS grouping’s power and future influence resides in their maritime domains, the value of which ultimately depends upon the responsible governance and use of ocean territories. The maritime interests of BRICS countries only become meaningful if reinforced by maritime security governance and co-operation in the respective oceans. Presently China and India seem to dominate the maritime stage of BRICS, but the South Atlantic is an often overlooked space. For BRICS the value of the South Atlantic stems from how it secures and unlocks the potential of this maritime space through co-operative ventures between Brazil, South Africa as a late BRICS partner, and West African littoral states in particular. Unfortunately, BRICS holds its own maritime tensions, as member countries also pursue competing interests at sea.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200351
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292017000200351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-8529.2017390200008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional v.39 n.2 2017
reponame:Contexto Internacional
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron:PUC_RIO
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron_str PUC_RIO
institution PUC_RIO
reponame_str Contexto Internacional
collection Contexto Internacional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br
_version_ 1752127872396427264