Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Koyama,Hitomi
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Contexto Internacional
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300783
Resumo: Abstract Abstract: Historicism has shaped global politics by projecting multiple images of development. Specifically, it has served to legitimise Western forms of hegemony by naturalising the schema of ‘First in the West, then in the Rest,’ thereby damning non-Western Others to the ‘waiting room’ of history (Chakrabarty 2000). In this light, decolonising international relations must likewise complement efforts to decolonise the stagist views of historicism implicit in civilisational history. However, this focus on stagism neglects the ways in which historicism has also been employed to assert non-Western agencies in the name of culture, and to legitimise colonialism, as it was in the case of Japan. The case of Japan thus raises the question of whether limiting the critique of historicism to that of being a stagist civilisational discourse is sufficient or not. This article argues that there are not just one but two problems with historicism in international relations: first, that the stagist view of history legitimises the civilising mission; and second, that the romantic turn to culture as a means of resisting Eurocentric history may actually underwrite a colonialist discourse as well. If this is correct, the debate on historicism must not only engage with the concept of civilisation, but also with the concept of culture as a site through which sovereignty is projected.
id PUC_RIO-22_558f3bb6a99cb5d8c8b9180214315397
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-85292016000300783
network_acronym_str PUC_RIO-22
network_name_str Contexto Internacional
repository_id_str
spelling Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime JapanColonialismJapanese History ProblemProvincialising EuropeCultureHistoricismAbstract Abstract: Historicism has shaped global politics by projecting multiple images of development. Specifically, it has served to legitimise Western forms of hegemony by naturalising the schema of ‘First in the West, then in the Rest,’ thereby damning non-Western Others to the ‘waiting room’ of history (Chakrabarty 2000). In this light, decolonising international relations must likewise complement efforts to decolonise the stagist views of historicism implicit in civilisational history. However, this focus on stagism neglects the ways in which historicism has also been employed to assert non-Western agencies in the name of culture, and to legitimise colonialism, as it was in the case of Japan. The case of Japan thus raises the question of whether limiting the critique of historicism to that of being a stagist civilisational discourse is sufficient or not. This article argues that there are not just one but two problems with historicism in international relations: first, that the stagist view of history legitimises the civilising mission; and second, that the romantic turn to culture as a means of resisting Eurocentric history may actually underwrite a colonialist discourse as well. If this is correct, the debate on historicism must not only engage with the concept of civilisation, but also with the concept of culture as a site through which sovereignty is projected.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300783Contexto Internacional v.38 n.3 2016reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2016380300003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKoyama,Hitomieng2016-12-06T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292016000300783Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2016-12-06T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
title Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
spellingShingle Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
Koyama,Hitomi
Colonialism
Japanese History Problem
Provincialising Europe
Culture
Historicism
title_short Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
title_full Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
title_fullStr Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
title_full_unstemmed Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
title_sort Historicism, Coloniality, and Culture in Wartime Japan
author Koyama,Hitomi
author_facet Koyama,Hitomi
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Koyama,Hitomi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colonialism
Japanese History Problem
Provincialising Europe
Culture
Historicism
topic Colonialism
Japanese History Problem
Provincialising Europe
Culture
Historicism
description Abstract Abstract: Historicism has shaped global politics by projecting multiple images of development. Specifically, it has served to legitimise Western forms of hegemony by naturalising the schema of ‘First in the West, then in the Rest,’ thereby damning non-Western Others to the ‘waiting room’ of history (Chakrabarty 2000). In this light, decolonising international relations must likewise complement efforts to decolonise the stagist views of historicism implicit in civilisational history. However, this focus on stagism neglects the ways in which historicism has also been employed to assert non-Western agencies in the name of culture, and to legitimise colonialism, as it was in the case of Japan. The case of Japan thus raises the question of whether limiting the critique of historicism to that of being a stagist civilisational discourse is sufficient or not. This article argues that there are not just one but two problems with historicism in international relations: first, that the stagist view of history legitimises the civilising mission; and second, that the romantic turn to culture as a means of resisting Eurocentric history may actually underwrite a colonialist discourse as well. If this is correct, the debate on historicism must not only engage with the concept of civilisation, but also with the concept of culture as a site through which sovereignty is projected.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300783
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300783
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-8529.2016380300003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional v.38 n.3 2016
reponame:Contexto Internacional
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron:PUC_RIO
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron_str PUC_RIO
institution PUC_RIO
reponame_str Contexto Internacional
collection Contexto Internacional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br
_version_ 1752127872348192768