Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Albuquerque,Felipe Leal
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Contexto Internacional
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000200259
Resumo: Abstract The election of Donald Trump brought disarray to the climate change regime. The changes in what was up to then a promoter of the liberal international order (LIO) exacerbated existing tensions while creating new ones. This paper investigates how that challenge impacted the behaviours of Brazil, China and the European Union (EU) by comparatively analysing their dissimilar positions with respect to three indicators before and after Trump’s coming into power. These indicators are individual pledges and climate-related policies; approaches to climate finance; and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC). The analysis first shows how the US started eroding the broader LIO and the climate change regime to then delve into the behaviours of the three respective key players concerning climate talks. I sustain that the EU, despite its inner divisions, is already counteracting Washington, whereas China is combining a pro-status quo position based on a rhetorical condemnation of the United States. Brazil, in turn, had a transition towards a climate-sceptic government, shifting from being a cooperative actor to abdicating hosting the COP25.
id PUC_RIO-22_7251e0caccf2f2dd650a557675fd3b97
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-85292021000200259
network_acronym_str PUC_RIO-22
network_name_str Contexto Internacional
repository_id_str
spelling Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Orderclimate changemultilateralismenvironmentUNFCCCEuropean UnionChinaBrazil.Abstract The election of Donald Trump brought disarray to the climate change regime. The changes in what was up to then a promoter of the liberal international order (LIO) exacerbated existing tensions while creating new ones. This paper investigates how that challenge impacted the behaviours of Brazil, China and the European Union (EU) by comparatively analysing their dissimilar positions with respect to three indicators before and after Trump’s coming into power. These indicators are individual pledges and climate-related policies; approaches to climate finance; and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC). The analysis first shows how the US started eroding the broader LIO and the climate change regime to then delve into the behaviours of the three respective key players concerning climate talks. I sustain that the EU, despite its inner divisions, is already counteracting Washington, whereas China is combining a pro-status quo position based on a rhetorical condemnation of the United States. Brazil, in turn, had a transition towards a climate-sceptic government, shifting from being a cooperative actor to abdicating hosting the COP25.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2021-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000200259Contexto Internacional v.43 n.2 2021reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430200002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlbuquerque,Felipe Lealeng2021-08-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292021000200259Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2021-08-12T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
title Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
spellingShingle Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
Albuquerque,Felipe Leal
climate change
multilateralism
environment
UNFCCC
European Union
China
Brazil.
title_short Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
title_full Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
title_fullStr Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
title_full_unstemmed Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
title_sort Climate Politics and the Crisis of the Liberal International Order
author Albuquerque,Felipe Leal
author_facet Albuquerque,Felipe Leal
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Albuquerque,Felipe Leal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv climate change
multilateralism
environment
UNFCCC
European Union
China
Brazil.
topic climate change
multilateralism
environment
UNFCCC
European Union
China
Brazil.
description Abstract The election of Donald Trump brought disarray to the climate change regime. The changes in what was up to then a promoter of the liberal international order (LIO) exacerbated existing tensions while creating new ones. This paper investigates how that challenge impacted the behaviours of Brazil, China and the European Union (EU) by comparatively analysing their dissimilar positions with respect to three indicators before and after Trump’s coming into power. These indicators are individual pledges and climate-related policies; approaches to climate finance; and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC). The analysis first shows how the US started eroding the broader LIO and the climate change regime to then delve into the behaviours of the three respective key players concerning climate talks. I sustain that the EU, despite its inner divisions, is already counteracting Washington, whereas China is combining a pro-status quo position based on a rhetorical condemnation of the United States. Brazil, in turn, had a transition towards a climate-sceptic government, shifting from being a cooperative actor to abdicating hosting the COP25.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000200259
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000200259
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430200002
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional v.43 n.2 2021
reponame:Contexto Internacional
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron:PUC_RIO
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron_str PUC_RIO
institution PUC_RIO
reponame_str Contexto Internacional
collection Contexto Internacional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br
_version_ 1752127872978386944