Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Uziel,Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Santos,Norma Breda dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Contexto Internacional
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292019000100187
Resumo: Abstract The article deals with the historical methodology in the field of Brazilian foreign policy, based on reflections on the treatment of primary sources and the lessons of two important historians of antiquity: Moses I. Finley and Arnaldo Momigliano. Without disregarding the inherent temporal differences, it is understood that it is possible to bring contemporary and ancient history closer, as well as to establish a respectful dialogue between them. The article presents a preliminary discussion on the sources for the history of Brazilian foreign policy, followed by a series of analyses and comments on several aspects of the treatment of primary sources: a) the fragmentary nature of sources and the consequences of this; b) the predominance of discursive sources; c) the use of oral history as a supplementary source; and d) the difficulty in establishing a context for document production. Studies related to Brazilian foreign policy towards the Middle East will be used, especially the case of Brazil’s controversial favourable vote on Resolution 3379 (XXX) of the United Nations General Assembly, in 1975, which equated Zionism with racism.
id PUC_RIO-22_97accd70e494616957b82ead2c39d439
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-85292019000100187
network_acronym_str PUC_RIO-22
network_name_str Contexto Internacional
repository_id_str
spelling Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policyforeign policymethodologyinternational relationshistory of Brazilian foreign policyinternational historyAbstract The article deals with the historical methodology in the field of Brazilian foreign policy, based on reflections on the treatment of primary sources and the lessons of two important historians of antiquity: Moses I. Finley and Arnaldo Momigliano. Without disregarding the inherent temporal differences, it is understood that it is possible to bring contemporary and ancient history closer, as well as to establish a respectful dialogue between them. The article presents a preliminary discussion on the sources for the history of Brazilian foreign policy, followed by a series of analyses and comments on several aspects of the treatment of primary sources: a) the fragmentary nature of sources and the consequences of this; b) the predominance of discursive sources; c) the use of oral history as a supplementary source; and d) the difficulty in establishing a context for document production. Studies related to Brazilian foreign policy towards the Middle East will be used, especially the case of Brazil’s controversial favourable vote on Resolution 3379 (XXX) of the United Nations General Assembly, in 1975, which equated Zionism with racism.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292019000100187Contexto Internacional v.41 n.1 2019reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2019410100010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUziel,EduardoSantos,Norma Breda doseng2019-01-31T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292019000100187Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2019-01-31T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
title Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
spellingShingle Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
Uziel,Eduardo
foreign policy
methodology
international relations
history of Brazilian foreign policy
international history
title_short Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
title_full Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
title_fullStr Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
title_full_unstemmed Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
title_sort Source Criticism and the History of Brazilian Foreign Policy
author Uziel,Eduardo
author_facet Uziel,Eduardo
Santos,Norma Breda dos
author_role author
author2 Santos,Norma Breda dos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Uziel,Eduardo
Santos,Norma Breda dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv foreign policy
methodology
international relations
history of Brazilian foreign policy
international history
topic foreign policy
methodology
international relations
history of Brazilian foreign policy
international history
description Abstract The article deals with the historical methodology in the field of Brazilian foreign policy, based on reflections on the treatment of primary sources and the lessons of two important historians of antiquity: Moses I. Finley and Arnaldo Momigliano. Without disregarding the inherent temporal differences, it is understood that it is possible to bring contemporary and ancient history closer, as well as to establish a respectful dialogue between them. The article presents a preliminary discussion on the sources for the history of Brazilian foreign policy, followed by a series of analyses and comments on several aspects of the treatment of primary sources: a) the fragmentary nature of sources and the consequences of this; b) the predominance of discursive sources; c) the use of oral history as a supplementary source; and d) the difficulty in establishing a context for document production. Studies related to Brazilian foreign policy towards the Middle East will be used, especially the case of Brazil’s controversial favourable vote on Resolution 3379 (XXX) of the United Nations General Assembly, in 1975, which equated Zionism with racism.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292019000100187
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292019000100187
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s0102-8529.2019410100010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional v.41 n.1 2019
reponame:Contexto Internacional
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron:PUC_RIO
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
instacron_str PUC_RIO
institution PUC_RIO
reponame_str Contexto Internacional
collection Contexto Internacional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br
_version_ 1752127872734068736