Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Contexto Internacional |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000100173 |
Resumo: | Abstract The 2007-2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) eroded the consensus around the benefits of capital mobility within mainstream economics. Against this background, this paper discusses to what extent the new mainstream position on capital flow management measures, based on the New Welfare Economics, expands the policy space of developing and emerging economies (DEEs). This paper argues that the new position can be classified as an embedded neoliberal one, given that it keeps liberalization as its ultimate goal, while nonetheless accepting to mitigate some of its harmful consequences. After comparing the capital account policies of China and Brazil, this paper concludes that the policy prescriptions of the New Welfare Economics do not lead to higher levels of national autonomy for DEEs and are likewise unable to curb financial instability in these countries. |
id |
PUC_RIO-22_b66baf92b7658f6481741b9097436656 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0102-85292021000100173 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RIO-22 |
network_name_str |
Contexto Internacional |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economicscapital mobilitycapital controlsNew Welfare EconomicsPolitical Economyembedded neoliberalism.Abstract The 2007-2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) eroded the consensus around the benefits of capital mobility within mainstream economics. Against this background, this paper discusses to what extent the new mainstream position on capital flow management measures, based on the New Welfare Economics, expands the policy space of developing and emerging economies (DEEs). This paper argues that the new position can be classified as an embedded neoliberal one, given that it keeps liberalization as its ultimate goal, while nonetheless accepting to mitigate some of its harmful consequences. After comparing the capital account policies of China and Brazil, this paper concludes that the policy prescriptions of the New Welfare Economics do not lead to higher levels of national autonomy for DEEs and are likewise unable to curb financial instability in these countries.Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000100173Contexto Internacional v.43 n.1 2021reponame:Contexto Internacionalinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)instacron:PUC_RIO10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430100008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeruffo,LuizaSilva,Pedro Perfeito daCunha,André Moreiraeng2021-01-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-85292021000100173Revistahttp://contextointernacional.iri.puc-rio.br/cgi/cgilua.exe/sys/start.htm?tpl=homePUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br1982-02400102-8529opendoar:2021-01-11T00:00Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
title |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
spellingShingle |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics Peruffo,Luiza capital mobility capital controls New Welfare Economics Political Economy embedded neoliberalism. |
title_short |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
title_full |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
title_fullStr |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
title_sort |
Capital Account Regulation and National Autonomy: The Political Economy of the New Welfare Economics |
author |
Peruffo,Luiza |
author_facet |
Peruffo,Luiza Silva,Pedro Perfeito da Cunha,André Moreira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,Pedro Perfeito da Cunha,André Moreira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peruffo,Luiza Silva,Pedro Perfeito da Cunha,André Moreira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
capital mobility capital controls New Welfare Economics Political Economy embedded neoliberalism. |
topic |
capital mobility capital controls New Welfare Economics Political Economy embedded neoliberalism. |
description |
Abstract The 2007-2009 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) eroded the consensus around the benefits of capital mobility within mainstream economics. Against this background, this paper discusses to what extent the new mainstream position on capital flow management measures, based on the New Welfare Economics, expands the policy space of developing and emerging economies (DEEs). This paper argues that the new position can be classified as an embedded neoliberal one, given that it keeps liberalization as its ultimate goal, while nonetheless accepting to mitigate some of its harmful consequences. After comparing the capital account policies of China and Brazil, this paper concludes that the policy prescriptions of the New Welfare Economics do not lead to higher levels of national autonomy for DEEs and are likewise unable to curb financial instability in these countries. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000100173 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292021000100173 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s0102-8529.2019430100008 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Relações Internacionais |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional v.43 n.1 2021 reponame:Contexto Internacional instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) instacron:PUC_RIO |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RIO |
institution |
PUC_RIO |
reponame_str |
Contexto Internacional |
collection |
Contexto Internacional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Contexto Internacional - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RIO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cintjournal@puc-rio.br||contextointernacional@puc-rio.br |
_version_ |
1752127872971046912 |