Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | letrônica |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4287 |
Resumo: | Several grammars have done studies on the articulator but. However, it is noted that in all studies of these grammars the mas is classified and separated from its linguistic context. In this separation, one ends by ignoring the possibilities of use and the argumentative value of the articulator, since his relations with the statements that precede and succeed him usually do not receive attention. By studying the relationships between words, utterances and discourses, the Theory of Argumentation in Language (ANL) was chosen to base this research. For the ANL, the argument is in the language itself, and not in facts outside the real world. Thus, meaning will be constructed by the relationship established between words, utterances and discourses strictly in the linguistic context. The area of Discourse Theories where the ANL is, thus, allows a contextualized analysis of the articulator in order to identify its argumentative value. The research aims to verify how the ANL studies the articulators in the discourse and to recover the antecedent threads and the subsequent threads to the mas. |
id |
PUC_RS-14_0da0492871751a327b95d8e3eacc32e1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4287 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-14 |
network_name_str |
letrônica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in LanguageCaracterização do articulador mas no discurso pela Teoria da Argumentação na LínguaargumentaçãoenunciaçãoarticuladoresSeveral grammars have done studies on the articulator but. However, it is noted that in all studies of these grammars the mas is classified and separated from its linguistic context. In this separation, one ends by ignoring the possibilities of use and the argumentative value of the articulator, since his relations with the statements that precede and succeed him usually do not receive attention. By studying the relationships between words, utterances and discourses, the Theory of Argumentation in Language (ANL) was chosen to base this research. For the ANL, the argument is in the language itself, and not in facts outside the real world. Thus, meaning will be constructed by the relationship established between words, utterances and discourses strictly in the linguistic context. The area of Discourse Theories where the ANL is, thus, allows a contextualized analysis of the articulator in order to identify its argumentative value. The research aims to verify how the ANL studies the articulators in the discourse and to recover the antecedent threads and the subsequent threads to the mas.Diversas gramáticas têm realizado estudos sobre o articulador mas. Entretanto, nota-se que em todos os estudos dessas gramáticas o mas é classificado e separado de seu contexto lingüístico. Nessa separação, acaba-se por ignorar as possibilidades de uso e o valor argumentativo do articulador, já que as relações dele com os enunciados que o precedem e sucedem normalmente não recebem atenção. Por estudar as relações entre palavras, enunciados e discursos, a Teoria da Argumentação na Língua (ANL) foi escolhida para basear esta pesquisa. Para a ANL, a argumentação está na própria língua, e não em fatos externos ao mundo dito real. Sendo assim, o sentido será construído pela relação estabelecida entre palavras, enunciados e discursos estritamente no contexto lingüístico. A área de Teorias do Discurso onde se encontra a ANL, assim, permite que seja feita uma análise contextualizada do articulador, a fim de identificar seu valor argumentativo. A pesquisa tem por objetivos verificar como a ANL estuda os articuladores no discurso e recuperar os encadeamentos antecedentes e os encadeamentos subseqüentes ao mas.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2008-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4287Letrônica; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2008): Enunciação & Literatura Infanto-juvenil; 82-95Letrônica; v. 1 n. 1 (2008): Enunciação & Literatura Infanto-juvenil; 82-951984-4301reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4287/3547Nesello, Marcela Cristianeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-03-06T17:03:02Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4287Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2017-03-06T17:03:02letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language Caracterização do articulador mas no discurso pela Teoria da Argumentação na Língua |
title |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language |
spellingShingle |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language Nesello, Marcela Cristiane argumentação enunciação articuladores |
title_short |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language |
title_full |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language |
title_fullStr |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language |
title_sort |
Characterization of the articulator but in the speech by the Theory of Argumentation in Language |
author |
Nesello, Marcela Cristiane |
author_facet |
Nesello, Marcela Cristiane |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nesello, Marcela Cristiane |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
argumentação enunciação articuladores |
topic |
argumentação enunciação articuladores |
description |
Several grammars have done studies on the articulator but. However, it is noted that in all studies of these grammars the mas is classified and separated from its linguistic context. In this separation, one ends by ignoring the possibilities of use and the argumentative value of the articulator, since his relations with the statements that precede and succeed him usually do not receive attention. By studying the relationships between words, utterances and discourses, the Theory of Argumentation in Language (ANL) was chosen to base this research. For the ANL, the argument is in the language itself, and not in facts outside the real world. Thus, meaning will be constructed by the relationship established between words, utterances and discourses strictly in the linguistic context. The area of Discourse Theories where the ANL is, thus, allows a contextualized analysis of the articulator in order to identify its argumentative value. The research aims to verify how the ANL studies the articulators in the discourse and to recover the antecedent threads and the subsequent threads to the mas. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-12-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4287 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4287 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/4287/3547 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letrônica; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2008): Enunciação & Literatura Infanto-juvenil; 82-95 Letrônica; v. 1 n. 1 (2008): Enunciação & Literatura Infanto-juvenil; 82-95 1984-4301 reponame:letrônica instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
letrônica |
collection |
letrônica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128594775015424 |