The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | letrônica |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/16710 |
Resumo: | In this article, we investigated the processing of coreferential relations in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) to understand how this process develops in the human mind. The goal was to investigate how Principle A and Principle B of the Binding Theory (CHOMSKY, 1986) operate in the interpretation of coreferential anaphoric elements in sentences with reflexive pronouns. Using a self-paced reading paradigm, we replicated an experiment carried out by Oliveira et al. (2012), which investigated the influence of available and unavailable antecedents in the processing of the anaphoric element “a si mesmo(a).” In the present experiment, we only replaced the anaphoric word “a si” by “ele(a).” The goal was to investigate if the processing of the first element will be affected by Principle B or A. In the first case, if the pronoun “ele” is be bound to an antecedent out of the anaphora’s scope; in the second case, if the domain or if the following segment “mesmo(a)” is processed, there would be a reassessment of the initial decision from the interpretative process that forces application of Principle A. The results corroborate Nicol and Swinney’s (1989) study, and Oliveira, Leitão and Henrique’s (2012) study about Brazilian Portuguese. In both studies, the anaphora was related to the antecedent, i.e., the nearest element in relation to the Binding Theory. |
id |
PUC_RS-14_9ecf472eb08d364ee1bb133dca91d8a9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16710 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-14 |
network_name_str |
letrônica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB)A influência dos antecedentes disponíveis e não-disponíveis da anáfora “ele(a) mesmo(a)” em português brasileiro (PB)Binding TheoryCoreferential ProcessingAnaphoraTeoria da LigaçãoProcessamento CorreferencialAnáforas.In this article, we investigated the processing of coreferential relations in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) to understand how this process develops in the human mind. The goal was to investigate how Principle A and Principle B of the Binding Theory (CHOMSKY, 1986) operate in the interpretation of coreferential anaphoric elements in sentences with reflexive pronouns. Using a self-paced reading paradigm, we replicated an experiment carried out by Oliveira et al. (2012), which investigated the influence of available and unavailable antecedents in the processing of the anaphoric element “a si mesmo(a).” In the present experiment, we only replaced the anaphoric word “a si” by “ele(a).” The goal was to investigate if the processing of the first element will be affected by Principle B or A. In the first case, if the pronoun “ele” is be bound to an antecedent out of the anaphora’s scope; in the second case, if the domain or if the following segment “mesmo(a)” is processed, there would be a reassessment of the initial decision from the interpretative process that forces application of Principle A. The results corroborate Nicol and Swinney’s (1989) study, and Oliveira, Leitão and Henrique’s (2012) study about Brazilian Portuguese. In both studies, the anaphora was related to the antecedent, i.e., the nearest element in relation to the Binding Theory.Nesta pesquisa, investigamos o processamento das relações correferenciais do português brasileiro (PB) com o objetivo de compreender como esse processo se desenvolve na mente dos falantes dessa língua. Buscamos compreender como os Princípios A e B da Teoria da Ligação (Binding Theory, CHOMSKY, 1986) atuam na interpretação das anáforas correferenciais em sentenças com pronome reflexivo. Utilizando a técnica de leitura automonitorada, replicamos o trabalho aplicado por Oliveira et al. (2012), que investiga a influência dos antecedentes disponíveis e não disponíveis no processamento da anáfora “a si mesmo(a)”, substituindo apenas seu termo anafórico, “a si mesmo(a)”, por “ele(a) mesmo(a)”. Neste caso, dividimos “ele(a) mesmo(a)” em dois segmentos, com o intuito de verificar se o processamento do primeiro segmento será afetado pelo Princípio B, ou seja, se “ele(a)” irá se vincular ao antecedente fora do domínio de escopo da anáfora, ou, ao chegar ao segmento seguinte “mesmo(a)” haveria uma reanálise de sua decisão inicial a partir de um processo interpretativo que forçaria a aplicação do Princípio A. Os resultados encontrados corroboram o estudo feito em inglês por Nicol e Swinney (1989), assim como vão na mesma direção dos resultados obtidos por Oliveira, Leitão e Henrique (2012) para o português. Em ambos os trabalhos, a anáfora estabelece relação com o antecedente disponível, ou seja, o mais próximo em termos da Teoria da Ligação. Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2014-07-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/1671010.15448/1984-4301.2014.1.16710Letrônica; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2014): Psicolinguística & Escritas migrantes na literatura contemporânea; 278-297Letrônica; v. 7 n. 1 (2014): Psicolinguística & Escritas migrantes na literatura contemporânea; 278-2971984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2014.1reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/16710/11535Oliveira, Rosana Costa deFerrari Neto, JoséCastor, Janaína Barrosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-02-24T23:41:54Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16710Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2017-02-24T23:41:54letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) A influência dos antecedentes disponíveis e não-disponíveis da anáfora “ele(a) mesmo(a)” em português brasileiro (PB) |
title |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) |
spellingShingle |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) Oliveira, Rosana Costa de Binding Theory Coreferential Processing Anaphora Teoria da Ligação Processamento Correferencial Anáforas. |
title_short |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) |
title_full |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) |
title_fullStr |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) |
title_sort |
The Influence Of Both Avaliable And Not Avaliable Antecedents In The Processing Of Anaphoric Element “Ele(a) Mesmo(a)” In Brazilian Portuguese (PB) |
author |
Oliveira, Rosana Costa de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Rosana Costa de Ferrari Neto, José Castor, Janaína Barros |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferrari Neto, José Castor, Janaína Barros |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Rosana Costa de Ferrari Neto, José Castor, Janaína Barros |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Binding Theory Coreferential Processing Anaphora Teoria da Ligação Processamento Correferencial Anáforas. |
topic |
Binding Theory Coreferential Processing Anaphora Teoria da Ligação Processamento Correferencial Anáforas. |
description |
In this article, we investigated the processing of coreferential relations in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) to understand how this process develops in the human mind. The goal was to investigate how Principle A and Principle B of the Binding Theory (CHOMSKY, 1986) operate in the interpretation of coreferential anaphoric elements in sentences with reflexive pronouns. Using a self-paced reading paradigm, we replicated an experiment carried out by Oliveira et al. (2012), which investigated the influence of available and unavailable antecedents in the processing of the anaphoric element “a si mesmo(a).” In the present experiment, we only replaced the anaphoric word “a si” by “ele(a).” The goal was to investigate if the processing of the first element will be affected by Principle B or A. In the first case, if the pronoun “ele” is be bound to an antecedent out of the anaphora’s scope; in the second case, if the domain or if the following segment “mesmo(a)” is processed, there would be a reassessment of the initial decision from the interpretative process that forces application of Principle A. The results corroborate Nicol and Swinney’s (1989) study, and Oliveira, Leitão and Henrique’s (2012) study about Brazilian Portuguese. In both studies, the anaphora was related to the antecedent, i.e., the nearest element in relation to the Binding Theory. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/16710 10.15448/1984-4301.2014.1.16710 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/16710 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-4301.2014.1.16710 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/16710/11535 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letrônica; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2014): Psicolinguística & Escritas migrantes na literatura contemporânea; 278-297 Letrônica; v. 7 n. 1 (2014): Psicolinguística & Escritas migrantes na literatura contemporânea; 278-297 1984-4301 10.15448/1984-4301.2014.1 reponame:letrônica instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
letrônica |
collection |
letrônica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799128596527185920 |