We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado, Rosely Diniz da Silva
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Maass, Letícia Rosaura da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: letrônica
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/36233
Resumo: This paper aims to analyze the Escola Sem Partido Bill (PL 7.180/2014) that is being processed in the Chamber of Deputies since 2014 and whose purpose is to end an alleged ideological indoctrination to which students are presumably subjected to in school. Therefore, we intend to discuss issues such as the existence of Ideology in teaching and what kind of ideology one wants to extinguish with such a project. Aspects that concern the freedom and autonomy of schools, students and teachers, will also be addressed, as well as the way this project would work and its possible implications. The method of analysis applied is the Michel Pêcheux’s French Discourse Analysis (DA), which consists of a theoretical-analytical device and involves three distinct areas: Linguistics, Psychoanalysis, and the Historical Materialism. We intend to elucidate terms belonging to this theory so that we can start with the analysis of the said bill’s text, as well as the discourses of its counterproposals: the Escola Livre bill (PL 6.005/2016) and the Política Nacional de Liberdade para Aprender e Ensinar bill (PL 10.997/2018), in order to verify how these projects that relate to the same theme but have distinct objectives mean in Brazil today.
id PUC_RS-14_a533a16acedd6a508dfcd5f89eb0e1d8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36233
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-14
network_name_str letrônica
repository_id_str
spelling We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?We don’t need no education: Escola Sem Partido de quem e para quem?IdeologySchoolEducationAutonomyBillIdeologiaEscolaEnsinoAutonomiaProjeto de leiThis paper aims to analyze the Escola Sem Partido Bill (PL 7.180/2014) that is being processed in the Chamber of Deputies since 2014 and whose purpose is to end an alleged ideological indoctrination to which students are presumably subjected to in school. Therefore, we intend to discuss issues such as the existence of Ideology in teaching and what kind of ideology one wants to extinguish with such a project. Aspects that concern the freedom and autonomy of schools, students and teachers, will also be addressed, as well as the way this project would work and its possible implications. The method of analysis applied is the Michel Pêcheux’s French Discourse Analysis (DA), which consists of a theoretical-analytical device and involves three distinct areas: Linguistics, Psychoanalysis, and the Historical Materialism. We intend to elucidate terms belonging to this theory so that we can start with the analysis of the said bill’s text, as well as the discourses of its counterproposals: the Escola Livre bill (PL 6.005/2016) and the Política Nacional de Liberdade para Aprender e Ensinar bill (PL 10.997/2018), in order to verify how these projects that relate to the same theme but have distinct objectives mean in Brazil today.Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar o Projeto de Lei Escola Sem Partido (PL 7.180/2014), que tramita na Câmara dos Deputados desde 2014, cuja finalidade é findar uma suposta doutrinação ideológica às quais os alunos estariam sendo submetidos por seus educadores nas escolas. Assim, pretendemos discutir questões como a existência de Ideologia no ensino e que tipo de ideologia se quer extinguir. Serão abordados aspectos referentes à liberdade e à autonomia das escolas, alunos e professores, e como o referido projeto atuaria e as suas possíveis implicações. O método de análise utilizado para esse fim é o da Análise de Discurso de linha francesa (AD), de Michel Pêcheux, um dispositivo teórico-analítico, cujo tripé teórico envolve três áreas distintas: a Linguística, a Psicanálise e o Materialismo Histórico. Portanto, pretendemos elucidar termos próprios da teoria para que possamos partir para as questões analíticas do texto do projeto Escola Sem Partido, bem como de suas contrapropostas, o Projeto Escola Livre (PL 6.005/2016) e a Política Nacional de Liberdade para Aprender e Ensinar (PL 10.997/2018), visando verificar como esses projetos que dizem respeito ao mesmo tema, mas com objetivos distintos, significam no Brasil dos dias atuais.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/3623310.15448/1984-4301.2020.2.36233Letrônica; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): The Discourse of Intolerance in Contemporaneity; e36233Letrônica; v. 13 n. 2 (2020): Discurso Intolerante na Contemporaneidade; e362331984-430110.15448/1984-4301.2020.2reponame:letrônicainstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/36233/26125Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado, Rosely Diniz da SilvaMaass, Letícia Rosaura da Silva2020-11-24T12:15:28Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36233Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronicaPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/oailetronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com1984-43011984-4301opendoar:2020-11-24T12:15:28letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
We don’t need no education: Escola Sem Partido de quem e para quem?
title We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
spellingShingle We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
Machado, Rosely Diniz da Silva
Ideology
School
Education
Autonomy
Bill
Ideologia
Escola
Ensino
Autonomia
Projeto de lei
title_short We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
title_full We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
title_fullStr We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
title_full_unstemmed We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
title_sort We don’t need no education: whose No-Party School and to whom?
author Machado, Rosely Diniz da Silva
author_facet Machado, Rosely Diniz da Silva
Maass, Letícia Rosaura da Silva
author_role author
author2 Maass, Letícia Rosaura da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado, Rosely Diniz da Silva
Maass, Letícia Rosaura da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ideology
School
Education
Autonomy
Bill
Ideologia
Escola
Ensino
Autonomia
Projeto de lei
topic Ideology
School
Education
Autonomy
Bill
Ideologia
Escola
Ensino
Autonomia
Projeto de lei
description This paper aims to analyze the Escola Sem Partido Bill (PL 7.180/2014) that is being processed in the Chamber of Deputies since 2014 and whose purpose is to end an alleged ideological indoctrination to which students are presumably subjected to in school. Therefore, we intend to discuss issues such as the existence of Ideology in teaching and what kind of ideology one wants to extinguish with such a project. Aspects that concern the freedom and autonomy of schools, students and teachers, will also be addressed, as well as the way this project would work and its possible implications. The method of analysis applied is the Michel Pêcheux’s French Discourse Analysis (DA), which consists of a theoretical-analytical device and involves three distinct areas: Linguistics, Psychoanalysis, and the Historical Materialism. We intend to elucidate terms belonging to this theory so that we can start with the analysis of the said bill’s text, as well as the discourses of its counterproposals: the Escola Livre bill (PL 6.005/2016) and the Política Nacional de Liberdade para Aprender e Ensinar bill (PL 10.997/2018), in order to verify how these projects that relate to the same theme but have distinct objectives mean in Brazil today.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/36233
10.15448/1984-4301.2020.2.36233
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/36233
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-4301.2020.2.36233
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/letronica/article/view/36233/26125
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Letrônica
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letrônica; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): The Discourse of Intolerance in Contemporaneity; e36233
Letrônica; v. 13 n. 2 (2020): Discurso Intolerante na Contemporaneidade; e36233
1984-4301
10.15448/1984-4301.2020.2
reponame:letrônica
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str letrônica
collection letrônica
repository.name.fl_str_mv letrônica - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv letronica@pucrs.br||ivanetemileski@gmail.com
_version_ 1799128599384555520

Registros relacionados