Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mackinnon, Sterling
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Oficina do Historiador
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36694
Resumo: Geo-spatial visualising technologies are finding dynamic articulation within contemporary archaeology. With increasing regularity, archaeologists are using methods like drone-based photogrammetry to construct immersive spaces for research, analysis, and public-facing historical reconstructions. The rate at which they have been folded into the discipline, however, has outpaced efforts to critically theorise them. Too often these “new” forms of archaeological media are handled unreflexively. Often they are presented as easily knowable or self evident. This paper attends to what it identifies as the contingencies inherent to the production of such media. Using theorists like Donna Haraway and Karen Barad, it specifically attends to notions of “partial objectivity”, “situated knowledges” and “embodiment in contemporary archaeological practice. Centred around a series of observations conducted as part of an ethnography of the Discovery Programme’s involvement in the Cherish Project (a collaborative EU funded research initiative designed to monitor the impacts of climate change on coastal heritage sites in Ireland and Wales), it targets processes of data acquisition for photogrammetric modelling at the site of Dunbeg Fort in Co. Kerry, Ireland.
id PUC_RS-15_199ab31f3604695c61543db8039171e5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36694
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-15
network_name_str Oficina do Historiador
repository_id_str
spelling Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg FortAssembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg FortPhotogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.Geo-spatial visualising technologies are finding dynamic articulation within contemporary archaeology. With increasing regularity, archaeologists are using methods like drone-based photogrammetry to construct immersive spaces for research, analysis, and public-facing historical reconstructions. The rate at which they have been folded into the discipline, however, has outpaced efforts to critically theorise them. Too often these “new” forms of archaeological media are handled unreflexively. Often they are presented as easily knowable or self evident. This paper attends to what it identifies as the contingencies inherent to the production of such media. Using theorists like Donna Haraway and Karen Barad, it specifically attends to notions of “partial objectivity”, “situated knowledges” and “embodiment in contemporary archaeological practice. Centred around a series of observations conducted as part of an ethnography of the Discovery Programme’s involvement in the Cherish Project (a collaborative EU funded research initiative designed to monitor the impacts of climate change on coastal heritage sites in Ireland and Wales), it targets processes of data acquisition for photogrammetric modelling at the site of Dunbeg Fort in Co. Kerry, Ireland.Geo-spatial visualising technologies are finding dynamic articulation within contemporary archaeology. With increasing regularity, archaeologists are using methods like drone-based photogrammetry to construct immersive spaces for research, analysis, and public-facing historical reconstructions. The rate at which they have been folded into the discipline, however, has outpaced efforts to critically theorise them. Too often these “new” forms of archaeological media are handled unreflexively. Often they are presented as easily knowable or self evident. This paper attends to what it identifies as the contingencies inherent to the production of such media. Using theorists like Donna Haraway and Karen Barad, it specifically attends to notions of “partial objectivity”, “situated knowledges” and “embodiment in contemporary archaeological practice. Centred around a series of observations conducted as part of an ethnography of the Discovery Programme’s involvement in the Cherish Project (a collaborative EU funded research initiative designed to monitor the impacts of climate change on coastal heritage sites in Ireland and Wales), it targets processes of data acquisition for photogrammetric modelling at the site of Dunbeg Fort in Co. Kerry, Ireland.***Assemblagem de um local de aquisição: produção do conhecimento e prospecção com drone em Dunbeg Fort***As tecnologias geoespaciais de visualização tem encontrado uma articulação dinâmica com a arqueologia contemporânea. Com crescente regularidade, os arqueólogos têm usado métodos como a fotogrametria a partir de drones para construir espaços imersivos para pesquisas, análises e reconstruções históricas voltadas ao público. A velocidade a qual eles foram incluídos na disciplina, no entanto, ultrapassou os esforços para teoriza-los criticamente. Com demasiada frequência, essas “novas” formas de mídia arqueológica são tratadas de maneira não-reflexiva. Muitas vezes, são apresentadas como facilmente reconhecíveis ou mesmo evidentes. Este artigo atende ao que identifica como contingências inerentes à produção de tais mídias. Utilizando teóricos como Donna Haraway e Karen Barad, ele atente especificação a noções de “objetividade parcial”, “conhecimentos situados” e “incorporação” na prática arqueológica contemporânea. Centrado em torno de uma série de observações conduzidas como parte de uma etnografia relativa ao envolvimento do Programa Discovery no Projeto Cherish (uma iniciativa de pesquisa colaborativa financiada pela EU, projetada para monitorar os impactos das mudanças climáticas em patrimônios costeiros na Irlanda e no País de Gales), tem como alvo os processos de aquisição de dados para modelagem fotogramétrica no sítio de Dunberg em Co. Kerry, Irlanda.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Fotogrametria. Incorporação. Produção de Conhecimento.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/3669410.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36694Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36694Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36694Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e366942178-374810.15448/2178-3748.2020.1reponame:Oficina do Historiadorinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36694/19627Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiadorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMackinnon, Sterling2020-06-14T02:07:14Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36694Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriadorPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/oai||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br2178-37482178-3748opendoar:2020-06-14T02:07:14Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
title Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
spellingShingle Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
Mackinnon, Sterling
Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.
Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.
title_short Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
title_full Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
title_fullStr Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
title_full_unstemmed Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
title_sort Assembling a site of acquisition: knowledge production and drone survey at Dunbeg Fort
author Mackinnon, Sterling
author_facet Mackinnon, Sterling
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mackinnon, Sterling
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.
Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.
topic Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.
Photogrammetry. Embodiment. Knowledge Production.
description Geo-spatial visualising technologies are finding dynamic articulation within contemporary archaeology. With increasing regularity, archaeologists are using methods like drone-based photogrammetry to construct immersive spaces for research, analysis, and public-facing historical reconstructions. The rate at which they have been folded into the discipline, however, has outpaced efforts to critically theorise them. Too often these “new” forms of archaeological media are handled unreflexively. Often they are presented as easily knowable or self evident. This paper attends to what it identifies as the contingencies inherent to the production of such media. Using theorists like Donna Haraway and Karen Barad, it specifically attends to notions of “partial objectivity”, “situated knowledges” and “embodiment in contemporary archaeological practice. Centred around a series of observations conducted as part of an ethnography of the Discovery Programme’s involvement in the Cherish Project (a collaborative EU funded research initiative designed to monitor the impacts of climate change on coastal heritage sites in Ireland and Wales), it targets processes of data acquisition for photogrammetric modelling at the site of Dunbeg Fort in Co. Kerry, Ireland.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36694
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36694
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36694
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36694
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36694/19627
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36694
Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36694
Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e36694
2178-3748
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1
reponame:Oficina do Historiador
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Oficina do Historiador
collection Oficina do Historiador
repository.name.fl_str_mv Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799129361216962560