Who does Archaeology opens a window
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Oficina do Historiador |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634 |
Resumo: | Archaeological thinking has undergone effervescent criticism in recent decades as a result of ideas that challenge the hegemony of modern categories. The humanistic duality, the preponderance of discursiveness, and the notion of linear time, are some examples of categories that have been in check since the end of the last century. This scenario ended up providing a more pertinent approach between Archeology and other areas, such as Art. In this article, then, I provide an analysis of this interaction, highlighting some caveats that we should take before this dialogue. Still, I argue that Archeology should use Art, but not as mere inspiration, as a new kind of Archeology that promotes analogies, but as an instrument capable of providing us with a more combative epistemology, more in keeping with the proper characteristics of archaeological making. Finally, I bring here examples of three works developed in recent years that I think illustrate this potentiality. |
id |
PUC_RS-15_5cd5cb577163de6ff3d20d915f42ce52 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36634 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-15 |
network_name_str |
Oficina do Historiador |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Who does Archaeology opens a windowQuem faz Arqueologia abre uma janelaArchaeology. Art. Epistemology.Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia.Archaeological thinking has undergone effervescent criticism in recent decades as a result of ideas that challenge the hegemony of modern categories. The humanistic duality, the preponderance of discursiveness, and the notion of linear time, are some examples of categories that have been in check since the end of the last century. This scenario ended up providing a more pertinent approach between Archeology and other areas, such as Art. In this article, then, I provide an analysis of this interaction, highlighting some caveats that we should take before this dialogue. Still, I argue that Archeology should use Art, but not as mere inspiration, as a new kind of Archeology that promotes analogies, but as an instrument capable of providing us with a more combative epistemology, more in keeping with the proper characteristics of archaeological making. Finally, I bring here examples of three works developed in recent years that I think illustrate this potentiality.O pensamento arqueológico tem passado por efervescente criticismo nas últimas décadas em decorrência de ideias que contestam a hegemonia de categorias modernas. A dualidade humanista, a preponderância da discursividade, além da noção de tempo linear são alguns exemplos de categorias que estão em xeque desde o final do século passado. Esse cenário acabou propiciando uma aproximação mais pertinente entre a Arqueologia e outras áreas, como é o caso da Arte. Neste artigo, então, faço uma análise dessa interação, destacando algumas ressalvas que devemos tomar diante desse diálogo. Ainda, defendo que a Arqueologia deva, sim, utilizar-se da Arte, mas não como mera inspiração, tal qual uma nova espécie de Arqueologia promovedora de analogias, mas como um instrumental capaz de nos municiar de uma epistemologia mais combativa, mais condizente com as características próprias do fazer arqueológico. Por fim, trago aqui exemplos de três trabalhos desenvolvidos nos últimos anos e que julgo ilustrarem tal potencialidade.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/3663410.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36634Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36634Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36634Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e366342178-374810.15448/2178-3748.2020.1reponame:Oficina do Historiadorinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634/19626Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiadorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTramasoli, Felipe Benites2020-06-14T02:07:14Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36634Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriadorPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/oai||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br2178-37482178-3748opendoar:2020-06-14T02:07:14Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Who does Archaeology opens a window Quem faz Arqueologia abre uma janela |
title |
Who does Archaeology opens a window |
spellingShingle |
Who does Archaeology opens a window Tramasoli, Felipe Benites Archaeology. Art. Epistemology. Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia. |
title_short |
Who does Archaeology opens a window |
title_full |
Who does Archaeology opens a window |
title_fullStr |
Who does Archaeology opens a window |
title_full_unstemmed |
Who does Archaeology opens a window |
title_sort |
Who does Archaeology opens a window |
author |
Tramasoli, Felipe Benites |
author_facet |
Tramasoli, Felipe Benites |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tramasoli, Felipe Benites |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Archaeology. Art. Epistemology. Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia. |
topic |
Archaeology. Art. Epistemology. Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia. |
description |
Archaeological thinking has undergone effervescent criticism in recent decades as a result of ideas that challenge the hegemony of modern categories. The humanistic duality, the preponderance of discursiveness, and the notion of linear time, are some examples of categories that have been in check since the end of the last century. This scenario ended up providing a more pertinent approach between Archeology and other areas, such as Art. In this article, then, I provide an analysis of this interaction, highlighting some caveats that we should take before this dialogue. Still, I argue that Archeology should use Art, but not as mere inspiration, as a new kind of Archeology that promotes analogies, but as an instrument capable of providing us with a more combative epistemology, more in keeping with the proper characteristics of archaeological making. Finally, I bring here examples of three works developed in recent years that I think illustrate this potentiality. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-06-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36634 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36634 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634/19626 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36634 Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36634 Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e36634 2178-3748 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1 reponame:Oficina do Historiador instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Oficina do Historiador |
collection |
Oficina do Historiador |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799129361208573952 |