Who does Archaeology opens a window

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tramasoli, Felipe Benites
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Oficina do Historiador
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634
Resumo: Archaeological thinking has undergone effervescent criticism in recent decades as a result of ideas that challenge the hegemony of modern categories. The humanistic duality, the preponderance of discursiveness, and the notion of linear time, are some examples of categories that have been in check since the end of the last century. This scenario ended up providing a more pertinent approach between Archeology and other areas, such as Art. In this article, then, I provide an analysis of this interaction, highlighting some caveats that we should take before this dialogue. Still, I argue that Archeology should use Art, but not as mere inspiration, as a new kind of Archeology that promotes analogies, but as an instrument capable of providing us with a more combative epistemology, more in keeping with the proper characteristics of archaeological making. Finally, I bring here examples of three works developed in recent years that I think illustrate this potentiality.
id PUC_RS-15_5cd5cb577163de6ff3d20d915f42ce52
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36634
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-15
network_name_str Oficina do Historiador
repository_id_str
spelling Who does Archaeology opens a windowQuem faz Arqueologia abre uma janelaArchaeology. Art. Epistemology.Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia.Archaeological thinking has undergone effervescent criticism in recent decades as a result of ideas that challenge the hegemony of modern categories. The humanistic duality, the preponderance of discursiveness, and the notion of linear time, are some examples of categories that have been in check since the end of the last century. This scenario ended up providing a more pertinent approach between Archeology and other areas, such as Art. In this article, then, I provide an analysis of this interaction, highlighting some caveats that we should take before this dialogue. Still, I argue that Archeology should use Art, but not as mere inspiration, as a new kind of Archeology that promotes analogies, but as an instrument capable of providing us with a more combative epistemology, more in keeping with the proper characteristics of archaeological making. Finally, I bring here examples of three works developed in recent years that I think illustrate this potentiality.O pensamento arqueológico tem passado por efervescente criticismo nas últimas décadas em decorrência de ideias que contestam a hegemonia de categorias modernas. A dualidade humanista, a preponderância da discursividade, além da noção de tempo linear são alguns exemplos de categorias que estão em xeque desde o final do século passado. Esse cenário acabou propiciando uma aproximação mais pertinente entre a Arqueologia e outras áreas, como é o caso da Arte. Neste artigo, então, faço uma análise dessa interação, destacando algumas ressalvas que devemos tomar diante desse diálogo. Ainda, defendo que a Arqueologia deva, sim, utilizar-se da Arte, mas não como mera inspiração, tal qual uma nova espécie de Arqueologia promovedora de analogias, mas como um instrumental capaz de nos municiar de uma epistemologia mais combativa, mais condizente com as características próprias do fazer arqueológico. Por fim, trago aqui exemplos de três trabalhos desenvolvidos nos últimos anos e que julgo ilustrarem tal potencialidade.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-06-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/3663410.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36634Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36634Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36634Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e366342178-374810.15448/2178-3748.2020.1reponame:Oficina do Historiadorinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634/19626Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiadorhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTramasoli, Felipe Benites2020-06-14T02:07:14Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/36634Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriadorPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/oai||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br2178-37482178-3748opendoar:2020-06-14T02:07:14Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Who does Archaeology opens a window
Quem faz Arqueologia abre uma janela
title Who does Archaeology opens a window
spellingShingle Who does Archaeology opens a window
Tramasoli, Felipe Benites
Archaeology. Art. Epistemology.
Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia.
title_short Who does Archaeology opens a window
title_full Who does Archaeology opens a window
title_fullStr Who does Archaeology opens a window
title_full_unstemmed Who does Archaeology opens a window
title_sort Who does Archaeology opens a window
author Tramasoli, Felipe Benites
author_facet Tramasoli, Felipe Benites
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tramasoli, Felipe Benites
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Archaeology. Art. Epistemology.
Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia.
topic Archaeology. Art. Epistemology.
Arqueologia. Arte. Epistemologia.
description Archaeological thinking has undergone effervescent criticism in recent decades as a result of ideas that challenge the hegemony of modern categories. The humanistic duality, the preponderance of discursiveness, and the notion of linear time, are some examples of categories that have been in check since the end of the last century. This scenario ended up providing a more pertinent approach between Archeology and other areas, such as Art. In this article, then, I provide an analysis of this interaction, highlighting some caveats that we should take before this dialogue. Still, I argue that Archeology should use Art, but not as mere inspiration, as a new kind of Archeology that promotes analogies, but as an instrument capable of providing us with a more combative epistemology, more in keeping with the proper characteristics of archaeological making. Finally, I bring here examples of three works developed in recent years that I think illustrate this potentiality.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36634
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1.36634
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/36634/19626
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2020); e36634
Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020); e36634
Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 1 (2020); e36634
2178-3748
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.1
reponame:Oficina do Historiador
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Oficina do Historiador
collection Oficina do Historiador
repository.name.fl_str_mv Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799129361208573952