Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Oficina do Historiador |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932 |
Resumo: | The concept of “heterodiscourse” (raznorétchie), such as developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, constitutes a powerful and yet still rarely used methodological tool for historians, in particular for the study of literary sources. Understanding it, at first, as the incorporation of the speech of others in the novel, this text intends to elaborate this formulation more deeply. This will be done through dialogue with other traditional concepts of the Bakhtinian arsenal, such as “dialogism” and “polyphony”, but not only. Based on some episodes of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605-1615), my intention is to elaborate and demonstrate, from the concept of heterodiscourse, analysis tools that could be useful to historians. At first, I formulate the idea of “degree of objectification of language”, seeking to address the complex issue of the authenticity of object representation through language. In a second, more important moment, I propose the systematization of heterodiscourse at progressive levels of different depths – what I called “heterodiscursive levels” – aiming to embrace the multiple layers of social voices present in a novel and better capture the historical reality through which these are circumscribed. |
id |
PUC_RS-15_8159d06ead1b4a8de61e4cf355623a50 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/35932 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-15 |
network_name_str |
Oficina do Historiador |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romanceO heterodiscurso como método de análise histórica do romanceMikhail Bakhtin.HeterodiscourseHistoriographyMikhail BakhtinHeterodiscursoHistoriografiaThe concept of “heterodiscourse” (raznorétchie), such as developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, constitutes a powerful and yet still rarely used methodological tool for historians, in particular for the study of literary sources. Understanding it, at first, as the incorporation of the speech of others in the novel, this text intends to elaborate this formulation more deeply. This will be done through dialogue with other traditional concepts of the Bakhtinian arsenal, such as “dialogism” and “polyphony”, but not only. Based on some episodes of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605-1615), my intention is to elaborate and demonstrate, from the concept of heterodiscourse, analysis tools that could be useful to historians. At first, I formulate the idea of “degree of objectification of language”, seeking to address the complex issue of the authenticity of object representation through language. In a second, more important moment, I propose the systematization of heterodiscourse at progressive levels of different depths – what I called “heterodiscursive levels” – aiming to embrace the multiple layers of social voices present in a novel and better capture the historical reality through which these are circumscribed.O conceito de “heterodiscurso” (raznorétchie), tal como desenvolvido por Mikhail Bakhtin, constitui-se como uma poderosa e ainda pouco usada ferramenta metodológica para os historiadores, em particular para o estudo de fontes literárias. Entendendo-o, a princípio, como a incorporação do discurso alheio no romance, este texto pretende elaborar essa formulação mais profundamente. Isso será feito por meio do diálogo com outros tradicionais conceitos do arsenal bakhtiniano, tais como “dialogismo” e “polifonia”, mas não somente. Tomando como base alguns episódios da obra Dom Quixote (1605-1615), de Miguel de Cervantes, minha intenção é elaborar e demonstrar, a partir do conceito de heterodiscurso, ferramentas de análise úteis ao historiador. Em um primeiro momento, formulo a ideia de “grau de objetificação da linguagem”, buscando dar conta da complexa questão da autenticidade da representação do objeto através da linguagem. Em um segundo momento, mais importante, proponho a sistematização do heterodiscurso em progressivos níveis de distintas profundidades – o que chamei de “níveis heterodiscursivos” –, almejando abarcar as múltiplas camadas de vozes sociais presentes em um romance e melhor capturar a realidade histórica pela qual estes são circunscritos.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-08-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/3593210.15448/2178-3748.2020.2.35932Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020); e35932Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2020); e35932Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 2 (2020); e359322178-374810.15448/2178-3748.2020.2reponame:Oficina do Historiadorinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932/26469Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiadorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchechner, Caio Rodrigues2020-12-21T18:21:59Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/35932Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriadorPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/oai||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br2178-37482178-3748opendoar:2020-12-21T18:21:59Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance O heterodiscurso como método de análise histórica do romance |
title |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance |
spellingShingle |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance Schechner, Caio Rodrigues Mikhail Bakhtin. Heterodiscourse Historiography Mikhail Bakhtin Heterodiscurso Historiografia |
title_short |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance |
title_full |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance |
title_fullStr |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance |
title_sort |
Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance |
author |
Schechner, Caio Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Schechner, Caio Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schechner, Caio Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mikhail Bakhtin. Heterodiscourse Historiography Mikhail Bakhtin Heterodiscurso Historiografia |
topic |
Mikhail Bakhtin. Heterodiscourse Historiography Mikhail Bakhtin Heterodiscurso Historiografia |
description |
The concept of “heterodiscourse” (raznorétchie), such as developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, constitutes a powerful and yet still rarely used methodological tool for historians, in particular for the study of literary sources. Understanding it, at first, as the incorporation of the speech of others in the novel, this text intends to elaborate this formulation more deeply. This will be done through dialogue with other traditional concepts of the Bakhtinian arsenal, such as “dialogism” and “polyphony”, but not only. Based on some episodes of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605-1615), my intention is to elaborate and demonstrate, from the concept of heterodiscourse, analysis tools that could be useful to historians. At first, I formulate the idea of “degree of objectification of language”, seeking to address the complex issue of the authenticity of object representation through language. In a second, more important moment, I propose the systematization of heterodiscourse at progressive levels of different depths – what I called “heterodiscursive levels” – aiming to embrace the multiple layers of social voices present in a novel and better capture the historical reality through which these are circumscribed. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.2.35932 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.2.35932 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932/26469 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020); e35932 Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2020); e35932 Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 2 (2020); e35932 2178-3748 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.2 reponame:Oficina do Historiador instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Oficina do Historiador |
collection |
Oficina do Historiador |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799129361191796736 |