Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schechner, Caio Rodrigues
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Oficina do Historiador
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932
Resumo: The concept of “heterodiscourse” (raznorétchie), such as developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, constitutes a powerful and yet still rarely used methodological tool for historians, in particular for the study of literary sources. Understanding it, at first, as the incorporation of the speech of others in the novel, this text intends to elaborate this formulation more deeply. This will be done through dialogue with other traditional concepts of the Bakhtinian arsenal, such as “dialogism” and “polyphony”, but not only. Based on some episodes of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605-1615), my intention is to elaborate and demonstrate, from the concept of heterodiscourse, analysis tools that could be useful to historians. At first, I formulate the idea of “degree of objectification of language”, seeking to address the complex issue of the authenticity of object representation through language. In a second, more important moment, I propose the systematization of heterodiscourse at progressive levels of different depths – what I called “heterodiscursive levels” – aiming to embrace the multiple layers of social voices present in a novel and better capture the historical reality through which these are circumscribed.
id PUC_RS-15_8159d06ead1b4a8de61e4cf355623a50
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/35932
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-15
network_name_str Oficina do Historiador
repository_id_str
spelling Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romanceO heterodiscurso como método de análise histórica do romanceMikhail Bakhtin.HeterodiscourseHistoriographyMikhail BakhtinHeterodiscursoHistoriografiaThe concept of “heterodiscourse” (raznorétchie), such as developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, constitutes a powerful and yet still rarely used methodological tool for historians, in particular for the study of literary sources. Understanding it, at first, as the incorporation of the speech of others in the novel, this text intends to elaborate this formulation more deeply. This will be done through dialogue with other traditional concepts of the Bakhtinian arsenal, such as “dialogism” and “polyphony”, but not only. Based on some episodes of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605-1615), my intention is to elaborate and demonstrate, from the concept of heterodiscourse, analysis tools that could be useful to historians. At first, I formulate the idea of “degree of objectification of language”, seeking to address the complex issue of the authenticity of object representation through language. In a second, more important moment, I propose the systematization of heterodiscourse at progressive levels of different depths – what I called “heterodiscursive levels” – aiming to embrace the multiple layers of social voices present in a novel and better capture the historical reality through which these are circumscribed.O conceito de “heterodiscurso” (raznorétchie), tal como desenvolvido por Mikhail Bakhtin, constitui-se como uma poderosa e ainda pouco usada ferramenta metodológica para os historiadores, em particular para o estudo de fontes literárias. Entendendo-o, a princípio, como a incorporação do discurso alheio no romance, este texto pretende elaborar essa formulação mais profundamente. Isso será feito por meio do diálogo com outros tradicionais conceitos do arsenal bakhtiniano, tais como “dialogismo” e “polifonia”, mas não somente. Tomando como base alguns episódios da obra Dom Quixote (1605-1615), de Miguel de Cervantes, minha intenção é elaborar e demonstrar, a partir do conceito de heterodiscurso, ferramentas de análise úteis ao historiador. Em um primeiro momento, formulo a ideia de “grau de objetificação da linguagem”, buscando dar conta da complexa questão da autenticidade da representação do objeto através da linguagem. Em um segundo momento, mais importante, proponho a sistematização do heterodiscurso em progressivos níveis de distintas profundidades – o que chamei de “níveis heterodiscursivos” –, almejando abarcar as múltiplas camadas de vozes sociais presentes em um romance e melhor capturar a realidade histórica pela qual estes são circunscritos.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-08-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/3593210.15448/2178-3748.2020.2.35932Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020); e35932Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2020); e35932Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 2 (2020); e359322178-374810.15448/2178-3748.2020.2reponame:Oficina do Historiadorinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932/26469Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiadorhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchechner, Caio Rodrigues2020-12-21T18:21:59Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/35932Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriadorPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/oai||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br2178-37482178-3748opendoar:2020-12-21T18:21:59Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
O heterodiscurso como método de análise histórica do romance
title Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
spellingShingle Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
Schechner, Caio Rodrigues
Mikhail Bakhtin.
Heterodiscourse
Historiography
Mikhail Bakhtin
Heterodiscurso
Historiografia
title_short Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
title_full Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
title_fullStr Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
title_full_unstemmed Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
title_sort Heterodiscourse as a method of historical analysis of romance
author Schechner, Caio Rodrigues
author_facet Schechner, Caio Rodrigues
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schechner, Caio Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mikhail Bakhtin.
Heterodiscourse
Historiography
Mikhail Bakhtin
Heterodiscurso
Historiografia
topic Mikhail Bakhtin.
Heterodiscourse
Historiography
Mikhail Bakhtin
Heterodiscurso
Historiografia
description The concept of “heterodiscourse” (raznorétchie), such as developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, constitutes a powerful and yet still rarely used methodological tool for historians, in particular for the study of literary sources. Understanding it, at first, as the incorporation of the speech of others in the novel, this text intends to elaborate this formulation more deeply. This will be done through dialogue with other traditional concepts of the Bakhtinian arsenal, such as “dialogism” and “polyphony”, but not only. Based on some episodes of Miguel de Cervantes’s Don Quixote (1605-1615), my intention is to elaborate and demonstrate, from the concept of heterodiscourse, analysis tools that could be useful to historians. At first, I formulate the idea of “degree of objectification of language”, seeking to address the complex issue of the authenticity of object representation through language. In a second, more important moment, I propose the systematization of heterodiscourse at progressive levels of different depths – what I called “heterodiscursive levels” – aiming to embrace the multiple layers of social voices present in a novel and better capture the historical reality through which these are circumscribed.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.2.35932
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/2178-3748.2020.2.35932
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/oficinadohistoriador/article/view/35932/26469
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Oficina do Historiador
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020); e35932
Oficina do Historiador; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2020); e35932
Oficina do Historiador; v. 13 n. 2 (2020); e35932
2178-3748
10.15448/2178-3748.2020.2
reponame:Oficina do Historiador
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Oficina do Historiador
collection Oficina do Historiador
repository.name.fl_str_mv Oficina do Historiador - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||tatyana.maia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799129361191796736