The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Navegações (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/article/view/43038 |
Resumo: | The present paper provides an interpretation of Dom Casmurro, advancing as critical hypothesis an attempt to read the novel’s formal fragmentation, one of the characteristics of Machado de Assis’s so called free form, as a mimesis of the subjective structure of Bento Santiago, the novel’s ficcional author, understood from the perspective of romantic irony, as it was theoretically developed by Friedrich Schlegel (1973). In critical dialogue with the works of Roberto Schwarz (1977, 1990), José Guilherme Merquior (1978), Sá Rego (1989), Rouanet (2007), we have researched the different hermeneutical approaches the free form has received, in order to propose the specificity of our own interpretation. Having analyzed Schlegel’s texts and the secondary bibliography on romantic irony, we conclude that Bento Santiago’s narrative situation is concretized within the very novel’s free form, whose fragmentation and highly subjective nature expresses the paradox which constitutes romantic irony: the necessity and impossibility of an absolute communication. |
id |
PUC_RS-16_e265e358b8f4d8efcd2f0695b081039d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/43038 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-16 |
network_name_str |
Navegações (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free formA sombra de si mesmo: A ironia romântica como chave hermenêutica para a forma livre de Dom CasmurroMachado de AssisDom Casmurrofree formromantic ironyMachado de AssisDom Casmurroforma livreironia românticaThe present paper provides an interpretation of Dom Casmurro, advancing as critical hypothesis an attempt to read the novel’s formal fragmentation, one of the characteristics of Machado de Assis’s so called free form, as a mimesis of the subjective structure of Bento Santiago, the novel’s ficcional author, understood from the perspective of romantic irony, as it was theoretically developed by Friedrich Schlegel (1973). In critical dialogue with the works of Roberto Schwarz (1977, 1990), José Guilherme Merquior (1978), Sá Rego (1989), Rouanet (2007), we have researched the different hermeneutical approaches the free form has received, in order to propose the specificity of our own interpretation. Having analyzed Schlegel’s texts and the secondary bibliography on romantic irony, we conclude that Bento Santiago’s narrative situation is concretized within the very novel’s free form, whose fragmentation and highly subjective nature expresses the paradox which constitutes romantic irony: the necessity and impossibility of an absolute communication.O presente trabalho propõe uma interpretação de Dom Casmurro, tomando como hipótese crítica ler a fragmentação formal, característica da forma livre machadiana, como mímesis da estrutura subjetiva do autor ficcional, Bento Santiago, entendida a partir da figura reflexiva proposta pela ironia romântica, tal como pensada por Friedrich Schlegel (1973). Dialogando com os trabalhos de Roberto Schwarz (1977, 1990), José Guilherme Merquior (1978), Sá Rego (1989), Rouanet (2007), pesquisamos as diversas leituras que a forma livre tem recebido, para propor a especificidade da nossa leitura. Pelo estudo dos textos de Schlegel (1973) e comentadores, propomos que a situação narrativa de Bento Santiago se materializa na forma livre do romance, marcada pela fragmentação e subjetivação narrativas, espelhando o paradoxo basilar da ironia romântica: a necessidade e a impossibilidade de uma comunicação total.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2022-10-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/article/view/4303810.15448/1983-4276.2022.1.43038Navegações; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): Single Volume; e43038Navegações; v. 15 n. 1 (2022): Volume Único; e430381983-42761982-852710.15448/1983-4276.2022.1reponame:Navegações (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/article/view/43038/27697Copyright (c) 2022 Navegaçõeshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos, Gabriel Loureiro Pereira da Mota2022-11-21T13:28:46Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/43038Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoesPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/oai||revistanavegacoes@pucrs.br1983-42761982-8527opendoar:2022-11-21T13:28:46Navegações (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form A sombra de si mesmo: A ironia romântica como chave hermenêutica para a forma livre de Dom Casmurro |
title |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form |
spellingShingle |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form Ramos, Gabriel Loureiro Pereira da Mota Machado de Assis Dom Casmurro free form romantic irony Machado de Assis Dom Casmurro forma livre ironia romântica |
title_short |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form |
title_full |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form |
title_fullStr |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form |
title_full_unstemmed |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form |
title_sort |
The shadow of himself: The romantic irony as hermeneutic key to Dom Casmurro’s free form |
author |
Ramos, Gabriel Loureiro Pereira da Mota |
author_facet |
Ramos, Gabriel Loureiro Pereira da Mota |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Gabriel Loureiro Pereira da Mota |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Machado de Assis Dom Casmurro free form romantic irony Machado de Assis Dom Casmurro forma livre ironia romântica |
topic |
Machado de Assis Dom Casmurro free form romantic irony Machado de Assis Dom Casmurro forma livre ironia romântica |
description |
The present paper provides an interpretation of Dom Casmurro, advancing as critical hypothesis an attempt to read the novel’s formal fragmentation, one of the characteristics of Machado de Assis’s so called free form, as a mimesis of the subjective structure of Bento Santiago, the novel’s ficcional author, understood from the perspective of romantic irony, as it was theoretically developed by Friedrich Schlegel (1973). In critical dialogue with the works of Roberto Schwarz (1977, 1990), José Guilherme Merquior (1978), Sá Rego (1989), Rouanet (2007), we have researched the different hermeneutical approaches the free form has received, in order to propose the specificity of our own interpretation. Having analyzed Schlegel’s texts and the secondary bibliography on romantic irony, we conclude that Bento Santiago’s narrative situation is concretized within the very novel’s free form, whose fragmentation and highly subjective nature expresses the paradox which constitutes romantic irony: the necessity and impossibility of an absolute communication. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/article/view/43038 10.15448/1983-4276.2022.1.43038 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/article/view/43038 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1983-4276.2022.1.43038 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/navegacoes/article/view/43038/27697 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Navegações http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Navegações http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Navegações; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): Single Volume; e43038 Navegações; v. 15 n. 1 (2022): Volume Único; e43038 1983-4276 1982-8527 10.15448/1983-4276.2022.1 reponame:Navegações (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Navegações (Online) |
collection |
Navegações (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Navegações (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistanavegacoes@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128837257166848 |