Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528 |
Resumo: | The multidisciplinary cooperation has expanded greatly since the middle of last century, and was integrated naturally in everyday life. But it comes with increasing disputes over claims of primacy or even exclusivity of certain professions. In Brazil, during the last decade was fought a noisy dispute about the place of the medical activity in the concert of professions in healthcare. This dispute had its epicenter in the so-called Law of the Medical Act. The question in dispute was whether the complexity of the object and the specific knowledge about it would legitimize special privileges for one profession at the expense of the others, or whether, instead, it would be more prudent if different perspectives were aggregated without hierarchy in a multiprofessional field. The text discusses the question of the legitimacy of exclusive prerogatives granted to professional groups, a classic theme in the functionalist perspective, reconstructs the lines of argumentation used in defense of the Medical Act Law and, finally, it looks how other professions currently position themselves in defense of their clams for prerogatives. |
id |
PUC_RS-17_2dd7f75f336485add63cc1b30c9325a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16528 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-17 |
network_name_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasksColaboração multiprofissional ouprerrogativas exclusivas? Tensões entre ideais e cotidiano profissionalProfessions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare.Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde.The multidisciplinary cooperation has expanded greatly since the middle of last century, and was integrated naturally in everyday life. But it comes with increasing disputes over claims of primacy or even exclusivity of certain professions. In Brazil, during the last decade was fought a noisy dispute about the place of the medical activity in the concert of professions in healthcare. This dispute had its epicenter in the so-called Law of the Medical Act. The question in dispute was whether the complexity of the object and the specific knowledge about it would legitimize special privileges for one profession at the expense of the others, or whether, instead, it would be more prudent if different perspectives were aggregated without hierarchy in a multiprofessional field. The text discusses the question of the legitimacy of exclusive prerogatives granted to professional groups, a classic theme in the functionalist perspective, reconstructs the lines of argumentation used in defense of the Medical Act Law and, finally, it looks how other professions currently position themselves in defense of their clams for prerogatives.A cooperação multiprofissional expandiu-se muito desde meados do último século e foi integrada com naturalidade na vida cotidiana. Mas ela vem acompanhada, também, de crescentes disputas em torno de pretensões de primazia ou mesmo de exclusividade de determinadas profissões. No Brasil, durante a última década foi travada uma ruidosa disputa em torno do lugar que cabe à atividade médica no concerto das profissões na área da saúde. Essa disputa teve como epicentro a assim chamada Lei do ato Médico. Estava em disputa a questão se a complexidade do objeto e as especificidades do conhecimento sobre ele legitimariam prerrogativas especiais de uma profissão em detrimento das outras, ou se, ao contrário, exigiriam que as diferentes perspectivas profissionais fossem agregadas equitativamente, constituindo a saúde um campo de cooperação multiprofissional. O texto discute a questão da legitimidade de prerrogativas exclusivas concedidas a grupos profissionais, um tema clássico na perspectiva funcionalista, reconstrói as linhas de argumentação usadas na defesa da Lei do Ato Médico e, por fim, olha como atualmente outras profissões se posicionam em defesa de suas prerrogativas.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2014-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/1652810.15448/1984-7289.2013.3.16528Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2013): Disciplines and professions challenged; 512-535Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-535Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 13 n. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-5351984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2013.3reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528/10882Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobottka, Emil A.2016-08-29T20:19:13Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16528Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-08-29T20:19:13Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks Colaboração multiprofissional ouprerrogativas exclusivas? Tensões entre ideais e cotidiano profissional |
title |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks |
spellingShingle |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks Sobottka, Emil A. Professions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare. Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde. |
title_short |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks |
title_full |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks |
title_fullStr |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks |
title_sort |
Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks |
author |
Sobottka, Emil A. |
author_facet |
Sobottka, Emil A. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sobottka, Emil A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Professions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare. Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde. |
topic |
Professions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare. Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde. |
description |
The multidisciplinary cooperation has expanded greatly since the middle of last century, and was integrated naturally in everyday life. But it comes with increasing disputes over claims of primacy or even exclusivity of certain professions. In Brazil, during the last decade was fought a noisy dispute about the place of the medical activity in the concert of professions in healthcare. This dispute had its epicenter in the so-called Law of the Medical Act. The question in dispute was whether the complexity of the object and the specific knowledge about it would legitimize special privileges for one profession at the expense of the others, or whether, instead, it would be more prudent if different perspectives were aggregated without hierarchy in a multiprofessional field. The text discusses the question of the legitimacy of exclusive prerogatives granted to professional groups, a classic theme in the functionalist perspective, reconstructs the lines of argumentation used in defense of the Medical Act Law and, finally, it looks how other professions currently position themselves in defense of their clams for prerogatives. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-03-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528 10.15448/1984-7289.2013.3.16528 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7289.2013.3.16528 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528/10882 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2013): Disciplines and professions challenged; 512-535 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-535 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 13 n. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-535 1984-7289 1519-6089 10.15448/1984-7289.2013.3 reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
civitas@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128806088245248 |