Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Sobottka, Emil A.
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528
Resumo: The multidisciplinary cooperation has expanded greatly since the middle of last century, and was integrated naturally in everyday life. But it comes with increasing disputes over claims of primacy or even exclusivity of certain professions. In Brazil, during the last decade was fought a noisy dispute about the place of the medical activity in the concert of professions in healthcare. This dispute had its epicenter in the so-called Law of the Medical Act. The question in dispute was whether the complexity of the object and the specific knowledge about it would legitimize special privileges for one profession at the expense of the others, or whether, instead, it would be more prudent if different perspectives were aggregated without hierarchy in a multiprofessional field. The text discusses the question of the legitimacy of exclusive prerogatives granted to professional groups, a classic theme in the functionalist perspective, reconstructs the lines of argumentation used in defense of the Medical Act Law and, finally, it looks how other professions currently position themselves in defense of their clams for prerogatives.
id PUC_RS-17_2dd7f75f336485add63cc1b30c9325a0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16528
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-17
network_name_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasksColaboração multiprofissional ouprerrogativas exclusivas? Tensões entre ideais e cotidiano profissionalProfessions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare.Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde.The multidisciplinary cooperation has expanded greatly since the middle of last century, and was integrated naturally in everyday life. But it comes with increasing disputes over claims of primacy or even exclusivity of certain professions. In Brazil, during the last decade was fought a noisy dispute about the place of the medical activity in the concert of professions in healthcare. This dispute had its epicenter in the so-called Law of the Medical Act. The question in dispute was whether the complexity of the object and the specific knowledge about it would legitimize special privileges for one profession at the expense of the others, or whether, instead, it would be more prudent if different perspectives were aggregated without hierarchy in a multiprofessional field. The text discusses the question of the legitimacy of exclusive prerogatives granted to professional groups, a classic theme in the functionalist perspective, reconstructs the lines of argumentation used in defense of the Medical Act Law and, finally, it looks how other professions currently position themselves in defense of their clams for prerogatives.A cooperação multiprofissional expandiu-se muito desde meados do último século e foi integrada com naturalidade na vida cotidiana. Mas ela vem acompanhada, também, de crescentes disputas em torno de pretensões de primazia ou mesmo de exclusividade de determinadas profissões. No Brasil, durante a última década foi travada uma ruidosa disputa em torno do lugar que cabe à atividade médica no concerto das profissões na área da saúde. Essa disputa teve como epicentro a assim chamada Lei do ato Médico. Estava em disputa a questão se a complexidade do objeto e as especificidades do conhecimento sobre ele legitimariam prerrogativas especiais de uma profissão em detrimento das outras, ou se, ao contrário, exigiriam que as diferentes perspectivas profissionais fossem agregadas equitativamente, constituindo a saúde um campo de cooperação multiprofissional. O texto discute a questão da legitimidade de prerrogativas exclusivas concedidas a grupos profissionais, um tema clássico na perspectiva funcionalista, reconstrói as linhas de argumentação usadas na defesa da Lei do Ato Médico e, por fim, olha como atualmente outras profissões se posicionam em defesa de suas prerrogativas.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2014-03-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/1652810.15448/1984-7289.2013.3.16528Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2013): Disciplines and professions challenged; 512-535Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-535Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 13 n. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-5351984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2013.3reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528/10882Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSobottka, Emil A.2016-08-29T20:19:13Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/16528Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-08-29T20:19:13Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
Colaboração multiprofissional ouprerrogativas exclusivas? Tensões entre ideais e cotidiano profissional
title Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
spellingShingle Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
Sobottka, Emil A.
Professions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare.
Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde.
title_short Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
title_full Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
title_fullStr Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
title_full_unstemmed Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
title_sort Multidisciplinary collaboration or exclusive prerogatives? Tensions between professional ideals and tasks
author Sobottka, Emil A.
author_facet Sobottka, Emil A.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sobottka, Emil A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Professions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare.
Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde.
topic Professions. Multiprofessional field. Medical act law. Healthcare.
Profissões. Campo multiprofissional. Ato médico. Saúde.
description The multidisciplinary cooperation has expanded greatly since the middle of last century, and was integrated naturally in everyday life. But it comes with increasing disputes over claims of primacy or even exclusivity of certain professions. In Brazil, during the last decade was fought a noisy dispute about the place of the medical activity in the concert of professions in healthcare. This dispute had its epicenter in the so-called Law of the Medical Act. The question in dispute was whether the complexity of the object and the specific knowledge about it would legitimize special privileges for one profession at the expense of the others, or whether, instead, it would be more prudent if different perspectives were aggregated without hierarchy in a multiprofessional field. The text discusses the question of the legitimacy of exclusive prerogatives granted to professional groups, a classic theme in the functionalist perspective, reconstructs the lines of argumentation used in defense of the Medical Act Law and, finally, it looks how other professions currently position themselves in defense of their clams for prerogatives.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-03-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528
10.15448/1984-7289.2013.3.16528
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-7289.2013.3.16528
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/16528/10882
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2013): Disciplines and professions challenged; 512-535
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-535
Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 13 n. 3 (2013): Disciplinas e profissões em debate; 512-535
1984-7289
1519-6089
10.15448/1984-7289.2013.3
reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv civitas@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128806088245248