Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/4324 |
Resumo: | The text raises the question of the conditions for the possibility of intersubjectivity in the theory of recognition. An analysis of the theory of recognition formulated by Axel Honneth shows how the conflict determined by moral motivations relativizes the Habermasian premise of the linguistic understanding and brings the normative dimension back to social theory. The author returns to the pages of the Encyclopedia of Hegel to recover the objective dimension of intersubjectivity and highlights problems in Honneth’s theoretical project. He confronts both the linguistic-hermeneutic and the recognition paradigm with his pressuposition of this intersubjectivity that yet have to be established, and concludes that the theory of recognition can not explain the normative basis of intersubjectiv recognition. This theory, so Testa, describes contexts of interaction and not moral imperatives. The golden rule, especially his negative formulation is seen as a better codification of the requirement to give recognition without neglecting the experience of offenses and fight; it is seen as a better positive justification of the norms of reciprocity. |
id |
PUC_RS-17_8d1a7bf50754850a01d3b5645e5871d5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4324 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-17 |
network_name_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden ruleIntersubjetividade, natureza e sentimentos morais: a teoria crítica de A. Honneth e a regra de ouroGolden ruleReciprocityRecognitionAxel HonnethRegra de ouroReciprocidadeReconhecimentoAxel HonnethThe text raises the question of the conditions for the possibility of intersubjectivity in the theory of recognition. An analysis of the theory of recognition formulated by Axel Honneth shows how the conflict determined by moral motivations relativizes the Habermasian premise of the linguistic understanding and brings the normative dimension back to social theory. The author returns to the pages of the Encyclopedia of Hegel to recover the objective dimension of intersubjectivity and highlights problems in Honneth’s theoretical project. He confronts both the linguistic-hermeneutic and the recognition paradigm with his pressuposition of this intersubjectivity that yet have to be established, and concludes that the theory of recognition can not explain the normative basis of intersubjectiv recognition. This theory, so Testa, describes contexts of interaction and not moral imperatives. The golden rule, especially his negative formulation is seen as a better codification of the requirement to give recognition without neglecting the experience of offenses and fight; it is seen as a better positive justification of the norms of reciprocity.O texto coloca a questão das condições de possibilidade da intersubjetividade na teoria do reconhecimento. Uma análise da teoria do reconhecimento formulada por Axel Honneth mostra como o conflito determinado por motivações morais relativiza o postulado Habermasiano do entendimento lingüístico e traz de volta a dimensão normativa à teoria social. O autor faz um retorno às páginas da Enciclopédia de Hegel para recuperar a dimensão objetiva da intersubjetividade e destacar problemas teóricos no projeto de Honneth. Com isso passa a confrontar tanto o paradigma lingüísticohermenêutico como o do reconhecimento com o fato de pressuporem a intersubjetividade a ser ainda constituída, para concluir que a teoria do reconhecimento não consegue explicitar um núcleo normativo do reconhecimento intersubjetivo; ela descreve contextos de interação e não imperativos morais. A da regra de ouro, em especial na formulação negativa (“não faças a ninguém aquilo que não gostarias que fosse feito a ti – Tb 4,15) é vista como melhor codificação da exigência de reconhecimento sem prescindir da experiência da ofensa e da luta, como melhor justificação positiva das normas de reciprocidade. Palavras-chave: Regra de ouro; Reciprocidade; Reconhecimento; Axel HonnethEditora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2008-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/432410.15448/1984-7289.2008.1.4324Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2008): Recognition and critical theory; 94-124Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2008): Reconhecimento e teoria crítica; 94-124Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 8 n. 1 (2008): Reconhecimento e teoria crítica; 94-1241984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2008.1reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/4324/6870Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTesta, Italo2016-08-29T20:47:42Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4324Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-08-29T20:47:42Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule Intersubjetividade, natureza e sentimentos morais: a teoria crítica de A. Honneth e a regra de ouro |
title |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule |
spellingShingle |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule Testa, Italo Golden rule Reciprocity Recognition Axel Honneth Regra de ouro Reciprocidade Reconhecimento Axel Honneth |
title_short |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule |
title_full |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule |
title_fullStr |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule |
title_sort |
Intersubjectivity, character and moral sentiments: the critical theory of A. Honneth and the golden rule |
author |
Testa, Italo |
author_facet |
Testa, Italo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Testa, Italo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Golden rule Reciprocity Recognition Axel Honneth Regra de ouro Reciprocidade Reconhecimento Axel Honneth |
topic |
Golden rule Reciprocity Recognition Axel Honneth Regra de ouro Reciprocidade Reconhecimento Axel Honneth |
description |
The text raises the question of the conditions for the possibility of intersubjectivity in the theory of recognition. An analysis of the theory of recognition formulated by Axel Honneth shows how the conflict determined by moral motivations relativizes the Habermasian premise of the linguistic understanding and brings the normative dimension back to social theory. The author returns to the pages of the Encyclopedia of Hegel to recover the objective dimension of intersubjectivity and highlights problems in Honneth’s theoretical project. He confronts both the linguistic-hermeneutic and the recognition paradigm with his pressuposition of this intersubjectivity that yet have to be established, and concludes that the theory of recognition can not explain the normative basis of intersubjectiv recognition. This theory, so Testa, describes contexts of interaction and not moral imperatives. The golden rule, especially his negative formulation is seen as a better codification of the requirement to give recognition without neglecting the experience of offenses and fight; it is seen as a better positive justification of the norms of reciprocity. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-10-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/4324 10.15448/1984-7289.2008.1.4324 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/4324 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7289.2008.1.4324 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/4324/6870 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2008): Recognition and critical theory; 94-124 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2008): Reconhecimento e teoria crítica; 94-124 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 8 n. 1 (2008): Reconhecimento e teoria crítica; 94-124 1984-7289 1519-6089 10.15448/1984-7289.2008.1 reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
civitas@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128805009260544 |