Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/8343 |
Resumo: | The aim of this research paper is to present the dilemmas involved in the efforts to define federalism. The paper’s approach ranges from the most basic references on the meaning of federalism to some attempts that seek to determine the concepts in a more meticulous way. Once a general framework of aspects has been established for the definition of federalism, we will try to demonstrate that, even so, when approaching different realities arising from this structure, there still remains a problem of definition. In order to illustrate the persistence of this conceptual indefinition, we will refer to concrete cases whose specific features may help to show the dilemmas involved in the efforts to suggest a concept of federalism. We seek to argue that the formalistic approaches, which focus on the features of institutions, might run the risk of taking wrong decisions. The specific type of current federalism depends on how its institutions overlap with specific political contexts. Therefore, the specific types of federate institutions relate to other political variables, amounting to different redundant results. Furthermore, the institutions are activated by specific political processes. The form in which the political power is distributed in a given political system depends partly on the characteristics of its institutions, but also depends on the form the political game theory is processed. |
id |
PUC_RS-17_fe7f499c8be3678da0ea1255e6c86600 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/8343 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-17 |
network_name_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definitionFederalismo: Dilemas de Uma Definição Conceitualfederalismintergovernmental relationspolitical processesinstitutionsfederalismorelações intergovernamentaisprocessos políticosinstituiçõesThe aim of this research paper is to present the dilemmas involved in the efforts to define federalism. The paper’s approach ranges from the most basic references on the meaning of federalism to some attempts that seek to determine the concepts in a more meticulous way. Once a general framework of aspects has been established for the definition of federalism, we will try to demonstrate that, even so, when approaching different realities arising from this structure, there still remains a problem of definition. In order to illustrate the persistence of this conceptual indefinition, we will refer to concrete cases whose specific features may help to show the dilemmas involved in the efforts to suggest a concept of federalism. We seek to argue that the formalistic approaches, which focus on the features of institutions, might run the risk of taking wrong decisions. The specific type of current federalism depends on how its institutions overlap with specific political contexts. Therefore, the specific types of federate institutions relate to other political variables, amounting to different redundant results. Furthermore, the institutions are activated by specific political processes. The form in which the political power is distributed in a given political system depends partly on the characteristics of its institutions, but also depends on the form the political game theory is processed.O objetivo do trabalho é apresentar os dilemas envolvidos no esforço de se conceituar federalismo. Aborda desde as referências mais básicas do significado de federalismo até algumas tentativas que buscam detalhar mais detidamente o conceito. Estabelecido um quadro geral de aspectos que definiriam o federalismo, buscaremos demonstrar que, ainda assim, ao abordar realidades diversas a partir desse quadro, permanece apresentando um problema de definição. Para exemplificar a persistência dessa indefinição conceitual, faremos referência a casos concretos cujas características específicas podem ajudar a evidenciar os dilemas envolvidos nesse esforço de sugerir um conceito de federalismo. Busca-se argumentar que as abordagens formalistas, que focam nas características das instituições, correm o risco de apresentar conclusões equivocadas. O tipo específico de federalismo existente depende de como suas instituições imbricam com contextos políticos particulares. Assim, os tipos particulares de instituições federativas combinam com outras variáveis políticas, redundando em resultados diversificados. Além disso, as instituições são ativadas por processos políticos específicos. A forma como o poder se distribui em um dado sistema político depende, em parte, das características de suas instituições, mas depende também de como o jogo político se processa.Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS2011-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/834310.15448/1984-7289.2011.2.8343Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2011): Laicities on debate; 323-338Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2011): Laicidades em debate; 323-338Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 11 n. 2 (2011): Laicidades em debate; 323-3381984-72891519-608910.15448/1984-7289.2011.2reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/8343/6612Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociaishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasconcelos Rocha, Carlos Alberto de2016-08-29T20:12:24Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/8343Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/oaiPRIhttp://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/civitas/oaicivitas@pucrs.br1984-72891519-6089opendoar:2016-08-29T20:12:24Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition Federalismo: Dilemas de Uma Definição Conceitual |
title |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition |
spellingShingle |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition Vasconcelos Rocha, Carlos Alberto de federalism intergovernmental relations political processes institutions federalismo relações intergovernamentais processos políticos instituições |
title_short |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition |
title_full |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition |
title_fullStr |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition |
title_sort |
Federalism: Dilemmas of a conceptual definition |
author |
Vasconcelos Rocha, Carlos Alberto de |
author_facet |
Vasconcelos Rocha, Carlos Alberto de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasconcelos Rocha, Carlos Alberto de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
federalism intergovernmental relations political processes institutions federalismo relações intergovernamentais processos políticos instituições |
topic |
federalism intergovernmental relations political processes institutions federalismo relações intergovernamentais processos políticos instituições |
description |
The aim of this research paper is to present the dilemmas involved in the efforts to define federalism. The paper’s approach ranges from the most basic references on the meaning of federalism to some attempts that seek to determine the concepts in a more meticulous way. Once a general framework of aspects has been established for the definition of federalism, we will try to demonstrate that, even so, when approaching different realities arising from this structure, there still remains a problem of definition. In order to illustrate the persistence of this conceptual indefinition, we will refer to concrete cases whose specific features may help to show the dilemmas involved in the efforts to suggest a concept of federalism. We seek to argue that the formalistic approaches, which focus on the features of institutions, might run the risk of taking wrong decisions. The specific type of current federalism depends on how its institutions overlap with specific political contexts. Therefore, the specific types of federate institutions relate to other political variables, amounting to different redundant results. Furthermore, the institutions are activated by specific political processes. The form in which the political power is distributed in a given political system depends partly on the characteristics of its institutions, but also depends on the form the political game theory is processed. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-09-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/8343 10.15448/1984-7289.2011.2.8343 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/8343 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7289.2011.2.8343 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/index.php/civitas/article/view/8343/6612 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Pucrs - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Civitas: journal of Social Sciences; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2011): Laicities on debate; 323-338 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; Vol. 11 Núm. 2 (2011): Laicidades em debate; 323-338 Civitas: revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 11 n. 2 (2011): Laicidades em debate; 323-338 1984-7289 1519-6089 10.15448/1984-7289.2011.2 reponame:Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
civitas@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128805515722752 |