Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Educação |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/44560 |
Resumo: | In recent times, sociological reflection on children has experienced a considerable development, giving rise to a new area of specialisation: the Sociology of Childhood. With this in mind, certain approaches have been quick to state that this incipient area has already reached the maturity required for its complete intellectual establishment, being consolidated as a scientific field. This paper refutes this thesis, considering, for example, the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu regarding the modus operandi of the scientific field. Thus, a double hypothesis is presented regarding contemporary studies on childhood, that is: 1) there is a difficulty for the Sociology of Childhood to consolidate itself as a scientific field; 2) this difficulty stems, in part, from the internal particularities of this incipient field, such as the mishaps of its structuring and the competing perspectives of approach within it. This hypothesis was tested through a review of sociological literature on childhood produced in Portuguese, English, French and Spanish. From the point of view of the results, it is inferred to prove the hypothesis and, among the conclusive considerations, it is stated that, only through a reflexive sociology, the sociologist of childhood can try to avoid the errors that weaken the scientific field that he intends to structure. |
id |
PUC_RS-18_21e757817876a94045b5da891de9f0b6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/44560 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-18 |
network_name_str |
Educação |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstaclesSociologia da Infância: campo científico, passos e percalçosSociology of Childhoodchildrenscientific fieldreflexivitySociologia da Infânciacriançascampo científicoreflexividadeSociología de la Infancianiñoscampo científicoreflexividadIn recent times, sociological reflection on children has experienced a considerable development, giving rise to a new area of specialisation: the Sociology of Childhood. With this in mind, certain approaches have been quick to state that this incipient area has already reached the maturity required for its complete intellectual establishment, being consolidated as a scientific field. This paper refutes this thesis, considering, for example, the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu regarding the modus operandi of the scientific field. Thus, a double hypothesis is presented regarding contemporary studies on childhood, that is: 1) there is a difficulty for the Sociology of Childhood to consolidate itself as a scientific field; 2) this difficulty stems, in part, from the internal particularities of this incipient field, such as the mishaps of its structuring and the competing perspectives of approach within it. This hypothesis was tested through a review of sociological literature on childhood produced in Portuguese, English, French and Spanish. From the point of view of the results, it is inferred to prove the hypothesis and, among the conclusive considerations, it is stated that, only through a reflexive sociology, the sociologist of childhood can try to avoid the errors that weaken the scientific field that he intends to structure.Nos últimos tempos, a reflexão sociológica sobre as crianças tem vivido um considerável desenvolvimento, dando origem a uma nova área de especialização: a Sociologia da Infância. Tendo isso em atenção, determinadas abordagens têm se apressado em afirmar que essa incipiente área já atingiu a maturação requerida para o seu completo estabelecimento intelectual, estando consolidada como campo científico. O presente trabalho refuta essa tese, considerando, por exemplo, os aportes de Pierre Bourdieu a respeito do modus operandi do campo científico. Assim, é apresentada uma dupla hipótese a respeito dos estudos contemporâneos sobre a infância, isto é: 1) há uma dificuldade de a Sociologia da Infância se consolidar como campo científico; 2) essa dificuldade decorre, em parte, das particularidades internas desse incipiente campo, a exemplo dos percalços da sua estruturação e das perspectivas de abordagem concorrentes em seu interior. Busca-se averiguar essa hipótese realizando-se uma revisão da literatura sociológica sobre a infância produzida em língua portuguesa, inglesa, francesa e espanhola. Como resultado, infere-se a comprovação da hipótese e, entre as considerações conclusivas, é afirmado que, só a partir de uma sociologia reflexiva, se pode procurar fazer com que o sociólogo da infância evite os erros que debilitam o campo científico que ele pretende construir.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2023-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/4456010.15448/1981-2582.2023.1.44560Educação; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume ; e44560Educação; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2023): Volumen único ; e44560Educação; v. 46 n. 1 (2023): Volume Único ; e445601981-25820101-465X10.15448/1981-2582.2023.1reponame:Educaçãoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/44560/28434Copyright (c) 2024 Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeite, Ivonaldo2024-04-01T17:30:48Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/44560Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/indexONGhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br||reveduc@pucrs.br1981-25820101-465Xopendoar:2024-04-01T17:30:48Educação - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles Sociologia da Infância: campo científico, passos e percalços |
title |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles |
spellingShingle |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles Leite, Ivonaldo Sociology of Childhood children scientific field reflexivity Sociologia da Infância crianças campo científico reflexividade Sociología de la Infancia niños campo científico reflexividad |
title_short |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles |
title_full |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles |
title_fullStr |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles |
title_sort |
Sociology of Childhood: scientific field, steps and obstacles |
author |
Leite, Ivonaldo |
author_facet |
Leite, Ivonaldo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Leite, Ivonaldo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sociology of Childhood children scientific field reflexivity Sociologia da Infância crianças campo científico reflexividade Sociología de la Infancia niños campo científico reflexividad |
topic |
Sociology of Childhood children scientific field reflexivity Sociologia da Infância crianças campo científico reflexividade Sociología de la Infancia niños campo científico reflexividad |
description |
In recent times, sociological reflection on children has experienced a considerable development, giving rise to a new area of specialisation: the Sociology of Childhood. With this in mind, certain approaches have been quick to state that this incipient area has already reached the maturity required for its complete intellectual establishment, being consolidated as a scientific field. This paper refutes this thesis, considering, for example, the contributions of Pierre Bourdieu regarding the modus operandi of the scientific field. Thus, a double hypothesis is presented regarding contemporary studies on childhood, that is: 1) there is a difficulty for the Sociology of Childhood to consolidate itself as a scientific field; 2) this difficulty stems, in part, from the internal particularities of this incipient field, such as the mishaps of its structuring and the competing perspectives of approach within it. This hypothesis was tested through a review of sociological literature on childhood produced in Portuguese, English, French and Spanish. From the point of view of the results, it is inferred to prove the hypothesis and, among the conclusive considerations, it is stated that, only through a reflexive sociology, the sociologist of childhood can try to avoid the errors that weaken the scientific field that he intends to structure. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/44560 10.15448/1981-2582.2023.1.44560 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/44560 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1981-2582.2023.1.44560 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/faced/article/view/44560/28434 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Educação http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação; Vol. 46 No. 1 (2023): Single Volume ; e44560 Educação; Vol. 46 Núm. 1 (2023): Volumen único ; e44560 Educação; v. 46 n. 1 (2023): Volume Único ; e44560 1981-2582 0101-465X 10.15448/1981-2582.2023.1 reponame:Educação instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Educação |
collection |
Educação |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora.periodicos@pucrs.br||reveduc@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128741227528192 |