Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Ernani Cesar de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Boaventura, Luis Henrique
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Letras de Hoje (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796
Resumo: This article analyzes the discursive staging on Twitter on an intensely polarized political spectrum where the parties of the debate fail to chain a legitimate negotiation of meaning among themselves, directing the enunciative act to appreciation of their pairs of debate and assigning to the opposite side a mere function to fulfill as an anti-guarantor of a negative ethical world whose characterization forges a contrast that strengthens the ethos of the enunciator. The theoretical framework is based on the scenography and ethos of Maingueneau (2008a), supported by the ethical act of Bakhtin (2012) and the ubiquitous communication of Santaella (2014). The analysis is based on a tweet about the death of Dona Marisa Letícia and the atmosphere of intolerance that covered social networks. We conclude that the oppositions of polarization operate a discursive staging in the service of their identity preservation that prevents them from accepting opposing perspectives.
id PUC_RS-19_deb25bd8ef53c71b15c7eb31fb64ad3a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30796
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-19
network_name_str Letras de Hoje (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on TwitterCenografia e ethos: o discurso da intolerância e polarização política no Twitterethosethical actubiquityscenographyTwitter.ethosato éticoubiquidadecenografiaTwitter.This article analyzes the discursive staging on Twitter on an intensely polarized political spectrum where the parties of the debate fail to chain a legitimate negotiation of meaning among themselves, directing the enunciative act to appreciation of their pairs of debate and assigning to the opposite side a mere function to fulfill as an anti-guarantor of a negative ethical world whose characterization forges a contrast that strengthens the ethos of the enunciator. The theoretical framework is based on the scenography and ethos of Maingueneau (2008a), supported by the ethical act of Bakhtin (2012) and the ubiquitous communication of Santaella (2014). The analysis is based on a tweet about the death of Dona Marisa Letícia and the atmosphere of intolerance that covered social networks. We conclude that the oppositions of polarization operate a discursive staging in the service of their identity preservation that prevents them from accepting opposing perspectives.Este artigo analisa a encenação discursiva no Twitter sobre um espectro político intensamente polarizado onde as partes do debate deixam de encadear uma negociação legítima de sentido entre si, dirigindo o ato enunciativo para apreciação de seus pares de debate e atribuindo ao lado oposto uma mera função a cumprir como antifiador de um mundo ético negativo cuja caracterização forja um contraste que fortalece o ethos do enunciador. O marco teórico se situa sobre a cenografia e ethos de Maingueneau (2008a), com amparo do ato ético de Bakhtin (2012) e da comunicação ubíqua de Santaella (2014). A análise recai sobre um tweet de réplica acerca da morte de Dona Marisa Letícia em fevereiro de 2017 e da atmosfera de intolerância que cobriu as redes sociais. Concluímos que as oposições da polarização operam uma encenação discursiva a serviço de sua preservação identitária que as previne de acolher perspectivas contrárias.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLinguísticaapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/3079610.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30796Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities; 449-458Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 Núm. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-458Letras de Hoje; v. 53 n. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-4581984-77260101-333510.15448/1984-7726.2018.3reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796/17638Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hojeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Ernani Cesar deBoaventura, Luis Henrique2021-04-27T20:27:19Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30796Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/falePRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br1984-77260101-3335opendoar:2021-04-27T20:27:19Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
Cenografia e ethos: o discurso da intolerância e polarização política no Twitter
title Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
spellingShingle Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
Freitas, Ernani Cesar de
ethos
ethical act
ubiquity
scenography
Twitter.
ethos
ato ético
ubiquidade
cenografia
Twitter.
title_short Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
title_full Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
title_fullStr Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
title_sort Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
author Freitas, Ernani Cesar de
author_facet Freitas, Ernani Cesar de
Boaventura, Luis Henrique
author_role author
author2 Boaventura, Luis Henrique
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Freitas, Ernani Cesar de
Boaventura, Luis Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ethos
ethical act
ubiquity
scenography
Twitter.
ethos
ato ético
ubiquidade
cenografia
Twitter.
topic ethos
ethical act
ubiquity
scenography
Twitter.
ethos
ato ético
ubiquidade
cenografia
Twitter.
description This article analyzes the discursive staging on Twitter on an intensely polarized political spectrum where the parties of the debate fail to chain a legitimate negotiation of meaning among themselves, directing the enunciative act to appreciation of their pairs of debate and assigning to the opposite side a mere function to fulfill as an anti-guarantor of a negative ethical world whose characterization forges a contrast that strengthens the ethos of the enunciator. The theoretical framework is based on the scenography and ethos of Maingueneau (2008a), supported by the ethical act of Bakhtin (2012) and the ubiquitous communication of Santaella (2014). The analysis is based on a tweet about the death of Dona Marisa Letícia and the atmosphere of intolerance that covered social networks. We conclude that the oppositions of polarization operate a discursive staging in the service of their identity preservation that prevents them from accepting opposing perspectives.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Linguística
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796
10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30796
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30796
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796/17638
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hoje
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hoje
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities; 449-458
Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 Núm. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-458
Letras de Hoje; v. 53 n. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-458
1984-7726
0101-3335
10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3
reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Letras de Hoje (Online)
collection Letras de Hoje (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv editora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br
_version_ 1799128781987774464