Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Letras de Hoje (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes the discursive staging on Twitter on an intensely polarized political spectrum where the parties of the debate fail to chain a legitimate negotiation of meaning among themselves, directing the enunciative act to appreciation of their pairs of debate and assigning to the opposite side a mere function to fulfill as an anti-guarantor of a negative ethical world whose characterization forges a contrast that strengthens the ethos of the enunciator. The theoretical framework is based on the scenography and ethos of Maingueneau (2008a), supported by the ethical act of Bakhtin (2012) and the ubiquitous communication of Santaella (2014). The analysis is based on a tweet about the death of Dona Marisa Letícia and the atmosphere of intolerance that covered social networks. We conclude that the oppositions of polarization operate a discursive staging in the service of their identity preservation that prevents them from accepting opposing perspectives. |
id |
PUC_RS-19_deb25bd8ef53c71b15c7eb31fb64ad3a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30796 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-19 |
network_name_str |
Letras de Hoje (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on TwitterCenografia e ethos: o discurso da intolerância e polarização política no Twitterethosethical actubiquityscenographyTwitter.ethosato éticoubiquidadecenografiaTwitter.This article analyzes the discursive staging on Twitter on an intensely polarized political spectrum where the parties of the debate fail to chain a legitimate negotiation of meaning among themselves, directing the enunciative act to appreciation of their pairs of debate and assigning to the opposite side a mere function to fulfill as an anti-guarantor of a negative ethical world whose characterization forges a contrast that strengthens the ethos of the enunciator. The theoretical framework is based on the scenography and ethos of Maingueneau (2008a), supported by the ethical act of Bakhtin (2012) and the ubiquitous communication of Santaella (2014). The analysis is based on a tweet about the death of Dona Marisa Letícia and the atmosphere of intolerance that covered social networks. We conclude that the oppositions of polarization operate a discursive staging in the service of their identity preservation that prevents them from accepting opposing perspectives.Este artigo analisa a encenação discursiva no Twitter sobre um espectro político intensamente polarizado onde as partes do debate deixam de encadear uma negociação legítima de sentido entre si, dirigindo o ato enunciativo para apreciação de seus pares de debate e atribuindo ao lado oposto uma mera função a cumprir como antifiador de um mundo ético negativo cuja caracterização forja um contraste que fortalece o ethos do enunciador. O marco teórico se situa sobre a cenografia e ethos de Maingueneau (2008a), com amparo do ato ético de Bakhtin (2012) e da comunicação ubíqua de Santaella (2014). A análise recai sobre um tweet de réplica acerca da morte de Dona Marisa Letícia em fevereiro de 2017 e da atmosfera de intolerância que cobriu as redes sociais. Concluímos que as oposições da polarização operam uma encenação discursiva a serviço de sua preservação identitária que as previne de acolher perspectivas contrárias.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLinguísticaapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/3079610.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30796Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities; 449-458Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 Núm. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-458Letras de Hoje; v. 53 n. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-4581984-77260101-333510.15448/1984-7726.2018.3reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796/17638Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hojeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFreitas, Ernani Cesar deBoaventura, Luis Henrique2021-04-27T20:27:19Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30796Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/falePRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br1984-77260101-3335opendoar:2021-04-27T20:27:19Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter Cenografia e ethos: o discurso da intolerância e polarização política no Twitter |
title |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter |
spellingShingle |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter Freitas, Ernani Cesar de ethos ethical act ubiquity scenography Twitter. ethos ato ético ubiquidade cenografia Twitter. |
title_short |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter |
title_full |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter |
title_fullStr |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter |
title_sort |
Scenography and ethos: the discourse of intolerance and political polarization on Twitter |
author |
Freitas, Ernani Cesar de |
author_facet |
Freitas, Ernani Cesar de Boaventura, Luis Henrique |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Boaventura, Luis Henrique |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Freitas, Ernani Cesar de Boaventura, Luis Henrique |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
ethos ethical act ubiquity scenography Twitter. ethos ato ético ubiquidade cenografia Twitter. |
topic |
ethos ethical act ubiquity scenography Twitter. ethos ato ético ubiquidade cenografia Twitter. |
description |
This article analyzes the discursive staging on Twitter on an intensely polarized political spectrum where the parties of the debate fail to chain a legitimate negotiation of meaning among themselves, directing the enunciative act to appreciation of their pairs of debate and assigning to the opposite side a mere function to fulfill as an anti-guarantor of a negative ethical world whose characterization forges a contrast that strengthens the ethos of the enunciator. The theoretical framework is based on the scenography and ethos of Maingueneau (2008a), supported by the ethical act of Bakhtin (2012) and the ubiquitous communication of Santaella (2014). The analysis is based on a tweet about the death of Dona Marisa Letícia and the atmosphere of intolerance that covered social networks. We conclude that the oppositions of polarization operate a discursive staging in the service of their identity preservation that prevents them from accepting opposing perspectives. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Linguística |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796 10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30796 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30796 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30796/17638 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hoje info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hoje |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities; 449-458 Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 Núm. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-458 Letras de Hoje; v. 53 n. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 449-458 1984-7726 0101-3335 10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3 reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Letras de Hoje (Online) |
collection |
Letras de Hoje (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128781987774464 |