The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Letras de Hoje (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30924 |
Resumo: | The present study aims to conduct a rhetoric argumentative comparative analysis between two newspaper reports, publicized in two different communication means, that publish and disclose the same scientific research. We intend to identify the various argumentative strategies used on both reports in the characterization of the contemporaneous woman, making use of the three rhetorical proofs - ethos, pathos and logos – in the wake of the studies developed by Amossy (2005, 2011), Charaudeau (2008) and Galinari (2012, 2014). It’s also intended to relate this discursive ethos to the concept of backlash, such as used by Faludi (2001). Within such conception, backlash is understood as a reactionary speech against the female emancipation arisen in the last decades. The analyses featured in the present article derive from an excerpt of our master’s dissertation. |
id |
PUC_RS-19_f6bc29a66b7749198969f155efbd8dd6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30924 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-19 |
network_name_str |
Letras de Hoje (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethosO backlash e a construção do ethos discursivo da mulherdiscursive ethosbacklashargumentative strategies.ethos discursivobacklashestratégias argumentativas.The present study aims to conduct a rhetoric argumentative comparative analysis between two newspaper reports, publicized in two different communication means, that publish and disclose the same scientific research. We intend to identify the various argumentative strategies used on both reports in the characterization of the contemporaneous woman, making use of the three rhetorical proofs - ethos, pathos and logos – in the wake of the studies developed by Amossy (2005, 2011), Charaudeau (2008) and Galinari (2012, 2014). It’s also intended to relate this discursive ethos to the concept of backlash, such as used by Faludi (2001). Within such conception, backlash is understood as a reactionary speech against the female emancipation arisen in the last decades. The analyses featured in the present article derive from an excerpt of our master’s dissertation.O presente trabalho tem por objetivo a realização de uma análise retóricoargumentativa comparativa entre duas reportagens jornalísticas, publicadas em dois veículos diversos, que noticiam e divulgam uma mesma pesquisa científica. Pretendemos identificar as diversas estratégias argumentativas utilizadas em ambas as reportagens na construção de um ethos discursivo da mulher contemporânea, fazendo uso das três provas retóricas – ethos, pathos e logos – na esteira dos estudos desenvolvidos por Amossy (2005, 2011), Charaudeau (2008) e Galinari (2012, 2014). Também pretendemos relacionar esse ethos discursivo ao conceito de backlash, tal como utilizado por Faludi (2001). Nessa concepção, o backlash é compreendido como um discurso reacionário à emancipação feminina ocorrida nas últimas décadas. As análises presentes neste artigo são provenientes de um recorte de nossa dissertação de mestrado.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2018-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionLinguísticaapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/3092410.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30924Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities; 422-429Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 Núm. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 422-429Letras de Hoje; v. 53 n. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 422-4291984-77260101-333510.15448/1984-7726.2018.3reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30924/17635Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hojeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFonseca, Elaine Cristina2021-04-27T20:24:05Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/30924Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/falePRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/oaieditora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br1984-77260101-3335opendoar:2021-04-27T20:24:05Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos O backlash e a construção do ethos discursivo da mulher |
title |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos |
spellingShingle |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos Fonseca, Elaine Cristina discursive ethos backlash argumentative strategies. ethos discursivo backlash estratégias argumentativas. |
title_short |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos |
title_full |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos |
title_fullStr |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos |
title_full_unstemmed |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos |
title_sort |
The backlash and the construction of the woman’s discursive ethos |
author |
Fonseca, Elaine Cristina |
author_facet |
Fonseca, Elaine Cristina |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Elaine Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
discursive ethos backlash argumentative strategies. ethos discursivo backlash estratégias argumentativas. |
topic |
discursive ethos backlash argumentative strategies. ethos discursivo backlash estratégias argumentativas. |
description |
The present study aims to conduct a rhetoric argumentative comparative analysis between two newspaper reports, publicized in two different communication means, that publish and disclose the same scientific research. We intend to identify the various argumentative strategies used on both reports in the characterization of the contemporaneous woman, making use of the three rhetorical proofs - ethos, pathos and logos – in the wake of the studies developed by Amossy (2005, 2011), Charaudeau (2008) and Galinari (2012, 2014). It’s also intended to relate this discursive ethos to the concept of backlash, such as used by Faludi (2001). Within such conception, backlash is understood as a reactionary speech against the female emancipation arisen in the last decades. The analyses featured in the present article derive from an excerpt of our master’s dissertation. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Linguística |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30924 10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30924 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30924 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3.30924 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fale/article/view/30924/17635 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hoje info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Letras de Hoje |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 No. 3 (2018): The discursive ethos: scope, challenges and potentialities; 422-429 Letras de Hoje; Vol. 53 Núm. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 422-429 Letras de Hoje; v. 53 n. 3 (2018): Ethos discursivo: alcance, desafios e potencialidades; 422-429 1984-7726 0101-3335 10.15448/1984-7726.2018.3 reponame:Letras de Hoje (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Letras de Hoje (Online) |
collection |
Letras de Hoje (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Letras de Hoje (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
editora.periodicos@pucrs.br || letrasdehoje@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1799128781994065920 |