Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira
Data de Publicação: 2007
Outros Autores: Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas, Leal, Cinira, Valença, Ana Maria Gondim
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261
Resumo: The aim was evaluate the pacifers available in the nacional market following the specifications defined by the vigent legislation. The sample was composed by 31 types of 6 commercials nationals marks of pacifers, being adquired for each one 3 examplaries from different fills. It was analysed descriptively the adequation or not of the following aspects: peck, shield, button, pine, ring and packaging, attending the criterias of the pacifers’ construction defined by NBR 10334/2003 of ABNT and the Resolution nº 221 of ANVISA. The pacifers were divided in groups (G), for the peck caracteristics: G1 – universal < 6 months; G2 – convencional < 6 months; G3 – orthodontic < 6 months; G4 – universal > 6 months; G5 – convencional > 6 months; G6 – orthodontic > 6 months. It was verified the inadequation for the items: A – length do peck; B – packaging following the NBR; C – packaging followed by ANVISA. The percentual of inadequation founded for the groups was: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11.1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33.3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33.3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33.3%, G4 – 33.3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22.2%. For the others evaluated items: material and form of the peck; the concavity of the shield, quantity and the diameter of the holes, the distance from the hole to the peck and to the borda externa, distance among the holes, the size of the shield; projection of the button; the vetilation hole and the projection pine and width and length of the ring it was observed the adequation for the analysed pacifers. It was concluded that the biggest part of the pacifers were qualifited as adequate for the construction requisitions, being the inadequation frequentetly registred for the packaging item. UNITERMS: pacifiers; standards; postmarketing.
id PUC_RS-22_0b85d49548961522f1ea96c644ae843f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/1261
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitionsAvaliação de chupetas disponíveis no mercado nacional segundo os requisitos da ABNT e ANVISAThe aim was evaluate the pacifers available in the nacional market following the specifications defined by the vigent legislation. The sample was composed by 31 types of 6 commercials nationals marks of pacifers, being adquired for each one 3 examplaries from different fills. It was analysed descriptively the adequation or not of the following aspects: peck, shield, button, pine, ring and packaging, attending the criterias of the pacifers’ construction defined by NBR 10334/2003 of ABNT and the Resolution nº 221 of ANVISA. The pacifers were divided in groups (G), for the peck caracteristics: G1 – universal < 6 months; G2 – convencional < 6 months; G3 – orthodontic < 6 months; G4 – universal > 6 months; G5 – convencional > 6 months; G6 – orthodontic > 6 months. It was verified the inadequation for the items: A – length do peck; B – packaging following the NBR; C – packaging followed by ANVISA. The percentual of inadequation founded for the groups was: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11.1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33.3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33.3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33.3%, G4 – 33.3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22.2%. For the others evaluated items: material and form of the peck; the concavity of the shield, quantity and the diameter of the holes, the distance from the hole to the peck and to the borda externa, distance among the holes, the size of the shield; projection of the button; the vetilation hole and the projection pine and width and length of the ring it was observed the adequation for the analysed pacifers. It was concluded that the biggest part of the pacifers were qualifited as adequate for the construction requisitions, being the inadequation frequentetly registred for the packaging item. UNITERMS: pacifiers; standards; postmarketing.Este trabalho objetivou avaliar chupetas disponíveis no mercado nacional segundo requisitos definidos pela legislação vigente. A amostra constou de 31 tipos de 6 marcas comerciais nacionais de chupetas, sendo para cada uma adquiridas 3 exemplares de lotes diferentes. Foi analisada descritivamente a adequação ou não dos aspectos: bico, escudo, botão, pino, argola e embalagem, atendendo aos critérios de construção de chupetas definidos pela NBR 10334/2003 da ABNT e a Resolução nº 221 da ANVISA. As chupetas foram divididas em grupos (G), conforme as características do bico: G1 – universal < 6 meses; G2 – convencional < 6 meses; G3 – ortodôntica < 6 meses; G4 – universal > 6 meses; G5 – convencional > 6 meses; G6 – ortodôntica > 6 meses. Verificou-se a inadequação nos itens: A – comprimento do bico; B – embalagem segundo a NBR; C – embalagem segundo a ANVISA. O percentual de inadequação encontrado para os grupos foi: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11,1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33,3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33,3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33,3%, G4 – 33,3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22,2%. Para os demais itens avaliados: material e forma do bico; concavidade do escudo, quantidade e diâmetro dos furos, distância do furo ao bico e à borda externa, distância entre os furos, tamanho do escudo; projeção do botão; orifício de ventilação e projeção do pino e largura e comprimento da argola constataram-se adequação para as chupetas analisadas. Conclui-se que a maioria das chupetas se apresentou adequada para os requisitos de construção, sendo a inadequação freqüentemente registrada no item embalagem. UNITERMOS: chupetas; normas; vigilância de produtos comercializados.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2007-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 22 No. 56 (2007); 112 - 117Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 22 n. 56 (2007); 112 - 1171980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261/986Lima, Cláudia Batista VieiraMedeiros, Maria Isabel DantasLeal, CiniraValença, Ana Maria Gondiminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-18T11:15:02Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/1261Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-18T11:15:02Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
Avaliação de chupetas disponíveis no mercado nacional segundo os requisitos da ABNT e ANVISA
title Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
spellingShingle Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira
title_short Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
title_full Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
title_fullStr Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
title_sort Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
author Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira
author_facet Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira
Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas
Leal, Cinira
Valença, Ana Maria Gondim
author_role author
author2 Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas
Leal, Cinira
Valença, Ana Maria Gondim
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira
Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas
Leal, Cinira
Valença, Ana Maria Gondim
description The aim was evaluate the pacifers available in the nacional market following the specifications defined by the vigent legislation. The sample was composed by 31 types of 6 commercials nationals marks of pacifers, being adquired for each one 3 examplaries from different fills. It was analysed descriptively the adequation or not of the following aspects: peck, shield, button, pine, ring and packaging, attending the criterias of the pacifers’ construction defined by NBR 10334/2003 of ABNT and the Resolution nº 221 of ANVISA. The pacifers were divided in groups (G), for the peck caracteristics: G1 – universal < 6 months; G2 – convencional < 6 months; G3 – orthodontic < 6 months; G4 – universal > 6 months; G5 – convencional > 6 months; G6 – orthodontic > 6 months. It was verified the inadequation for the items: A – length do peck; B – packaging following the NBR; C – packaging followed by ANVISA. The percentual of inadequation founded for the groups was: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11.1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33.3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33.3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33.3%, G4 – 33.3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22.2%. For the others evaluated items: material and form of the peck; the concavity of the shield, quantity and the diameter of the holes, the distance from the hole to the peck and to the borda externa, distance among the holes, the size of the shield; projection of the button; the vetilation hole and the projection pine and width and length of the ring it was observed the adequation for the analysed pacifers. It was concluded that the biggest part of the pacifers were qualifited as adequate for the construction requisitions, being the inadequation frequentetly registred for the packaging item. UNITERMS: pacifiers; standards; postmarketing.
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-07-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261/986
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 22 No. 56 (2007); 112 - 117
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 22 n. 56 (2007); 112 - 117
1980-6523
0102-9460
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820873725935616