Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2007 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261 |
Resumo: | The aim was evaluate the pacifers available in the nacional market following the specifications defined by the vigent legislation. The sample was composed by 31 types of 6 commercials nationals marks of pacifers, being adquired for each one 3 examplaries from different fills. It was analysed descriptively the adequation or not of the following aspects: peck, shield, button, pine, ring and packaging, attending the criterias of the pacifers’ construction defined by NBR 10334/2003 of ABNT and the Resolution nº 221 of ANVISA. The pacifers were divided in groups (G), for the peck caracteristics: G1 – universal < 6 months; G2 – convencional < 6 months; G3 – orthodontic < 6 months; G4 – universal > 6 months; G5 – convencional > 6 months; G6 – orthodontic > 6 months. It was verified the inadequation for the items: A – length do peck; B – packaging following the NBR; C – packaging followed by ANVISA. The percentual of inadequation founded for the groups was: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11.1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33.3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33.3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33.3%, G4 – 33.3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22.2%. For the others evaluated items: material and form of the peck; the concavity of the shield, quantity and the diameter of the holes, the distance from the hole to the peck and to the borda externa, distance among the holes, the size of the shield; projection of the button; the vetilation hole and the projection pine and width and length of the ring it was observed the adequation for the analysed pacifers. It was concluded that the biggest part of the pacifers were qualifited as adequate for the construction requisitions, being the inadequation frequentetly registred for the packaging item. UNITERMS: pacifiers; standards; postmarketing. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_0b85d49548961522f1ea96c644ae843f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/1261 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitionsAvaliação de chupetas disponíveis no mercado nacional segundo os requisitos da ABNT e ANVISAThe aim was evaluate the pacifers available in the nacional market following the specifications defined by the vigent legislation. The sample was composed by 31 types of 6 commercials nationals marks of pacifers, being adquired for each one 3 examplaries from different fills. It was analysed descriptively the adequation or not of the following aspects: peck, shield, button, pine, ring and packaging, attending the criterias of the pacifers’ construction defined by NBR 10334/2003 of ABNT and the Resolution nº 221 of ANVISA. The pacifers were divided in groups (G), for the peck caracteristics: G1 – universal < 6 months; G2 – convencional < 6 months; G3 – orthodontic < 6 months; G4 – universal > 6 months; G5 – convencional > 6 months; G6 – orthodontic > 6 months. It was verified the inadequation for the items: A – length do peck; B – packaging following the NBR; C – packaging followed by ANVISA. The percentual of inadequation founded for the groups was: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11.1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33.3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33.3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33.3%, G4 – 33.3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22.2%. For the others evaluated items: material and form of the peck; the concavity of the shield, quantity and the diameter of the holes, the distance from the hole to the peck and to the borda externa, distance among the holes, the size of the shield; projection of the button; the vetilation hole and the projection pine and width and length of the ring it was observed the adequation for the analysed pacifers. It was concluded that the biggest part of the pacifers were qualifited as adequate for the construction requisitions, being the inadequation frequentetly registred for the packaging item. UNITERMS: pacifiers; standards; postmarketing.Este trabalho objetivou avaliar chupetas disponíveis no mercado nacional segundo requisitos definidos pela legislação vigente. A amostra constou de 31 tipos de 6 marcas comerciais nacionais de chupetas, sendo para cada uma adquiridas 3 exemplares de lotes diferentes. Foi analisada descritivamente a adequação ou não dos aspectos: bico, escudo, botão, pino, argola e embalagem, atendendo aos critérios de construção de chupetas definidos pela NBR 10334/2003 da ABNT e a Resolução nº 221 da ANVISA. As chupetas foram divididas em grupos (G), conforme as características do bico: G1 – universal < 6 meses; G2 – convencional < 6 meses; G3 – ortodôntica < 6 meses; G4 – universal > 6 meses; G5 – convencional > 6 meses; G6 – ortodôntica > 6 meses. Verificou-se a inadequação nos itens: A – comprimento do bico; B – embalagem segundo a NBR; C – embalagem segundo a ANVISA. O percentual de inadequação encontrado para os grupos foi: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11,1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33,3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33,3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33,3%, G4 – 33,3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22,2%. Para os demais itens avaliados: material e forma do bico; concavidade do escudo, quantidade e diâmetro dos furos, distância do furo ao bico e à borda externa, distância entre os furos, tamanho do escudo; projeção do botão; orifício de ventilação e projeção do pino e largura e comprimento da argola constataram-se adequação para as chupetas analisadas. Conclui-se que a maioria das chupetas se apresentou adequada para os requisitos de construção, sendo a inadequação freqüentemente registrada no item embalagem. UNITERMOS: chupetas; normas; vigilância de produtos comercializados.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2007-07-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 22 No. 56 (2007); 112 - 117Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 22 n. 56 (2007); 112 - 1171980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261/986Lima, Cláudia Batista VieiraMedeiros, Maria Isabel DantasLeal, CiniraValença, Ana Maria Gondiminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-18T11:15:02Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/1261Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-18T11:15:02Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions Avaliação de chupetas disponíveis no mercado nacional segundo os requisitos da ABNT e ANVISA |
title |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira |
title_short |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions |
title_full |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the pacifers available in the nacional market following the ABNT and ANVISA requisitions |
author |
Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira |
author_facet |
Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas Leal, Cinira Valença, Ana Maria Gondim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas Leal, Cinira Valença, Ana Maria Gondim |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lima, Cláudia Batista Vieira Medeiros, Maria Isabel Dantas Leal, Cinira Valença, Ana Maria Gondim |
description |
The aim was evaluate the pacifers available in the nacional market following the specifications defined by the vigent legislation. The sample was composed by 31 types of 6 commercials nationals marks of pacifers, being adquired for each one 3 examplaries from different fills. It was analysed descriptively the adequation or not of the following aspects: peck, shield, button, pine, ring and packaging, attending the criterias of the pacifers’ construction defined by NBR 10334/2003 of ABNT and the Resolution nº 221 of ANVISA. The pacifers were divided in groups (G), for the peck caracteristics: G1 – universal < 6 months; G2 – convencional < 6 months; G3 – orthodontic < 6 months; G4 – universal > 6 months; G5 – convencional > 6 months; G6 – orthodontic > 6 months. It was verified the inadequation for the items: A – length do peck; B – packaging following the NBR; C – packaging followed by ANVISA. The percentual of inadequation founded for the groups was: A: G2 – 20%, G6 – 11.1%; B: G2 – 40%, G3 – 33.3%, G5 – 40%, G6 – 33.3%; C: G2 – 20%, G3 – 33.3%, G4 – 33.3%, G5 – 20%, G6 – 22.2%. For the others evaluated items: material and form of the peck; the concavity of the shield, quantity and the diameter of the holes, the distance from the hole to the peck and to the borda externa, distance among the holes, the size of the shield; projection of the button; the vetilation hole and the projection pine and width and length of the ring it was observed the adequation for the analysed pacifers. It was concluded that the biggest part of the pacifers were qualifited as adequate for the construction requisitions, being the inadequation frequentetly registred for the packaging item. UNITERMS: pacifiers; standards; postmarketing. |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-07-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/1261/986 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 22 No. 56 (2007); 112 - 117 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 22 n. 56 (2007); 112 - 117 1980-6523 0102-9460 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820873725935616 |