Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of different self-etching adhesive systems to bovine dentin.METHODS: For this purpose, 50 teeth were flattened with silicon carbide abrasive papers and randomly divided into 5 groups: SB – Single Bond Plus; Group AEO – Adper Easy One; Group ADH – AdheSE; Group ASE – Adper SE Plus and Group Clear – Clear Fill. After adhesive system application, 5 Tygon cylinders (1.8 mm×2 mm) were placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth, filled with resin composite (Filtek Z350) and light activated. Three composite resin cylinders were fabricated for each bovine crown, one being located in the incisal region, one in the middle third and one in the cervical region, totaling 30 composite resin test specimens (TS) for each group. The TS were submitted to the microshear bond strength test in a Universal Test Machine Kratos), at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min.RESULTS: The BS was calculated and analyzed by ANOVA (one-way) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). The highest BS values were obtained in Group SB and there were no significant differences between the adhesive systems tested in the middle and cervical thirds. In the fracture type analysis it was found that adhesive failure was dominant for all groups.CONCLUSION: The conventional two-step adhesive system SB presented the highest bond strength mean to bovine dentin for all the regions. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_3fca966d15eacd4c1dce8c72a1685e67 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/22482 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrateEstudo comparativo acerca da aplicação de sistema adesivo em diferentes regiões do substrato dentalSelf-etching adhesiveBond strengthBovine dentinsistemas adesivosAdesivo autocondicionanteForça de adesãoDentes bovinosOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of different self-etching adhesive systems to bovine dentin.METHODS: For this purpose, 50 teeth were flattened with silicon carbide abrasive papers and randomly divided into 5 groups: SB – Single Bond Plus; Group AEO – Adper Easy One; Group ADH – AdheSE; Group ASE – Adper SE Plus and Group Clear – Clear Fill. After adhesive system application, 5 Tygon cylinders (1.8 mm×2 mm) were placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth, filled with resin composite (Filtek Z350) and light activated. Three composite resin cylinders were fabricated for each bovine crown, one being located in the incisal region, one in the middle third and one in the cervical region, totaling 30 composite resin test specimens (TS) for each group. The TS were submitted to the microshear bond strength test in a Universal Test Machine Kratos), at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min.RESULTS: The BS was calculated and analyzed by ANOVA (one-way) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). The highest BS values were obtained in Group SB and there were no significant differences between the adhesive systems tested in the middle and cervical thirds. In the fracture type analysis it was found that adhesive failure was dominant for all groups.CONCLUSION: The conventional two-step adhesive system SB presented the highest bond strength mean to bovine dentin for all the regions.OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a força de adesão (FA) de diferentes sistemas adesivos auto-condicionantes aplicados na dentina bovina.METODOS: 50 dentes bovinos foram desgastados com lixas abrasivas e divididos aleatoriamente em 5 grupos: SB – Single Bond Plus; AEO – Adapter Easy One; ADH – AdheseSE; ASE – Adapter SE Plus and CLEAR – Clear Fill. Após a aplicação do sistema adesivo, 5 cilindros de Tygon (1,8 mm×2 mm) foram posicionados na superfície vestibular de cada dente, preenchidos com resina composta (Filtek Z350) e fotopolimerizados. Três cilindros de resina composta foram produzidos para cada coroa de dente bovino, um localizado na porção incisal, um no terço médio e outro na porção cervical, totalizando 30 corpos de prova (CP) para cada grupo. Os CP foram submetidos à Máquina de Teste Universal (Kratos) para avaliar a força de resistência à microtração, sob força constante de 0,5 mm/min. A FA foi calculada e analisada através do ANOVA de uma via e post hoc de Tuckey (p<0,05).RESULTADOS: A maior FA foi obtida no grupo SB e não houve diferença significante entre os sistemas testados nos terços médio e cervical. Após a análise do tipo de fratura, foi constatada a maior prevalência de falha adesiva em todos os grupos.CONCLUSÃO: O adesivo de dois passos SB apresentou a maior força de adesão nas no terço incisal de dentes bovinos quando comparado a adesivos autocondicionantes.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2017-08-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleTeste de resistência adesiva por microcisalhamentoapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2248210.15448/1980-6523.2016.4.22482Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2016); 158-163Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 31 n. 4 (2016); 158-1631980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2016.4reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482/15801Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamilotti, VeridianaBosquiroli, VirgíniaDobrovolski, MáxSinhoretic, Mario Alexandre CoelhoRibeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do MonteBertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci FerreiraMendonça, Márcio José2017-08-03T17:26:01Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/22482Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2017-08-03T17:26:01Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate Estudo comparativo acerca da aplicação de sistema adesivo em diferentes regiões do substrato dental |
title |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate Camilotti, Veridiana Self-etching adhesive Bond strength Bovine dentin sistemas adesivos Adesivo autocondicionante Força de adesão Dentes bovinos |
title_short |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate |
title_full |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate |
title_sort |
Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate |
author |
Camilotti, Veridiana |
author_facet |
Camilotti, Veridiana Bosquiroli, Virgínia Dobrovolski, Máx Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira Mendonça, Márcio José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bosquiroli, Virgínia Dobrovolski, Máx Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira Mendonça, Márcio José |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camilotti, Veridiana Bosquiroli, Virgínia Dobrovolski, Máx Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira Mendonça, Márcio José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Self-etching adhesive Bond strength Bovine dentin sistemas adesivos Adesivo autocondicionante Força de adesão Dentes bovinos |
topic |
Self-etching adhesive Bond strength Bovine dentin sistemas adesivos Adesivo autocondicionante Força de adesão Dentes bovinos |
description |
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of different self-etching adhesive systems to bovine dentin.METHODS: For this purpose, 50 teeth were flattened with silicon carbide abrasive papers and randomly divided into 5 groups: SB – Single Bond Plus; Group AEO – Adper Easy One; Group ADH – AdheSE; Group ASE – Adper SE Plus and Group Clear – Clear Fill. After adhesive system application, 5 Tygon cylinders (1.8 mm×2 mm) were placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth, filled with resin composite (Filtek Z350) and light activated. Three composite resin cylinders were fabricated for each bovine crown, one being located in the incisal region, one in the middle third and one in the cervical region, totaling 30 composite resin test specimens (TS) for each group. The TS were submitted to the microshear bond strength test in a Universal Test Machine Kratos), at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min.RESULTS: The BS was calculated and analyzed by ANOVA (one-way) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). The highest BS values were obtained in Group SB and there were no significant differences between the adhesive systems tested in the middle and cervical thirds. In the fracture type analysis it was found that adhesive failure was dominant for all groups.CONCLUSION: The conventional two-step adhesive system SB presented the highest bond strength mean to bovine dentin for all the regions. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-08-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Teste de resistência adesiva por microcisalhamento |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482 10.15448/1980-6523.2016.4.22482 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6523.2016.4.22482 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482/15801 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2016); 158-163 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 31 n. 4 (2016); 158-163 1980-6523 0102-9460 10.15448/1980-6523.2016.4 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820876981764096 |