Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Camilotti, Veridiana
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bosquiroli, Virgínia, Dobrovolski, Máx, Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho, Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte, Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira, Mendonça, Márcio José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of different self-etching adhesive systems to bovine dentin.METHODS: For this purpose, 50 teeth were flattened with silicon carbide abrasive papers and randomly divided into 5 groups: SB – Single Bond Plus; Group AEO – Adper Easy One; Group ADH – AdheSE; Group ASE – Adper SE Plus and Group Clear – Clear Fill. After adhesive system application, 5 Tygon cylinders (1.8 mm×2 mm) were placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth, filled with resin composite (Filtek Z350) and light activated. Three composite resin cylinders were fabricated for each bovine crown, one being located in the incisal region, one in the middle third and one in the cervical region, totaling 30 composite resin test specimens (TS) for each group. The TS were submitted to the microshear bond strength test in a Universal Test Machine  Kratos), at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min.RESULTS: The BS was calculated and analyzed by ANOVA (one-way) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). The highest BS values were obtained in Group SB and there were no significant differences between the adhesive systems tested in the middle and cervical thirds. In the fracture type analysis it was found that adhesive failure was dominant for all groups.CONCLUSION: The conventional two-step adhesive system SB presented the highest bond strength mean to bovine dentin for all the regions.
id PUC_RS-22_3fca966d15eacd4c1dce8c72a1685e67
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/22482
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrateEstudo comparativo acerca da aplicação de sistema adesivo em diferentes regiões do substrato dentalSelf-etching adhesiveBond strengthBovine dentinsistemas adesivosAdesivo autocondicionanteForça de adesãoDentes bovinosOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of different self-etching adhesive systems to bovine dentin.METHODS: For this purpose, 50 teeth were flattened with silicon carbide abrasive papers and randomly divided into 5 groups: SB – Single Bond Plus; Group AEO – Adper Easy One; Group ADH – AdheSE; Group ASE – Adper SE Plus and Group Clear – Clear Fill. After adhesive system application, 5 Tygon cylinders (1.8 mm×2 mm) were placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth, filled with resin composite (Filtek Z350) and light activated. Three composite resin cylinders were fabricated for each bovine crown, one being located in the incisal region, one in the middle third and one in the cervical region, totaling 30 composite resin test specimens (TS) for each group. The TS were submitted to the microshear bond strength test in a Universal Test Machine  Kratos), at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min.RESULTS: The BS was calculated and analyzed by ANOVA (one-way) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). The highest BS values were obtained in Group SB and there were no significant differences between the adhesive systems tested in the middle and cervical thirds. In the fracture type analysis it was found that adhesive failure was dominant for all groups.CONCLUSION: The conventional two-step adhesive system SB presented the highest bond strength mean to bovine dentin for all the regions.OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a força de adesão (FA) de diferentes sistemas adesivos auto-condicionantes aplicados na dentina bovina.METODOS: 50 dentes bovinos foram desgastados com lixas abrasivas e divididos aleatoriamente em 5 grupos: SB – Single Bond Plus; AEO – Adapter Easy One; ADH – AdheseSE; ASE – Adapter SE Plus and CLEAR – Clear Fill. Após a aplicação do sistema adesivo, 5 cilindros de Tygon (1,8 mm×2 mm) foram posicionados na superfície vestibular de cada dente, preenchidos com resina composta (Filtek Z350) e fotopolimerizados. Três cilindros de resina composta foram produzidos para cada coroa de dente bovino, um localizado na porção incisal, um no terço médio e outro na porção cervical, totalizando 30 corpos de prova (CP) para cada grupo. Os CP foram submetidos à Máquina de Teste Universal (Kratos) para avaliar a força de resistência à microtração, sob força constante de 0,5 mm/min. A FA foi calculada e analisada através do ANOVA de uma via e post hoc de Tuckey (p<0,05).RESULTADOS: A maior FA foi obtida no grupo SB e não houve diferença significante entre os sistemas testados nos terços médio e cervical. Após a análise do tipo de fratura, foi constatada a maior prevalência de falha adesiva em todos os grupos.CONCLUSÃO: O adesivo de dois passos SB apresentou a maior força de adesão nas no terço incisal de dentes bovinos quando comparado a adesivos autocondicionantes.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2017-08-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleTeste de resistência adesiva por microcisalhamentoapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2248210.15448/1980-6523.2016.4.22482Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2016); 158-163Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 31 n. 4 (2016); 158-1631980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2016.4reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482/15801Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCamilotti, VeridianaBosquiroli, VirgíniaDobrovolski, MáxSinhoretic, Mario Alexandre CoelhoRibeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do MonteBertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci FerreiraMendonça, Márcio José2017-08-03T17:26:01Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/22482Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2017-08-03T17:26:01Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
Estudo comparativo acerca da aplicação de sistema adesivo em diferentes regiões do substrato dental
title Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
spellingShingle Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
Camilotti, Veridiana
Self-etching adhesive
Bond strength
Bovine dentin
sistemas adesivos
Adesivo autocondicionante
Força de adesão
Dentes bovinos
title_short Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
title_full Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
title_fullStr Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
title_sort Comparative study of adhesive systems applied to different regions of dental substrate
author Camilotti, Veridiana
author_facet Camilotti, Veridiana
Bosquiroli, Virgínia
Dobrovolski, Máx
Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho
Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte
Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira
Mendonça, Márcio José
author_role author
author2 Bosquiroli, Virgínia
Dobrovolski, Máx
Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho
Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte
Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira
Mendonça, Márcio José
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Camilotti, Veridiana
Bosquiroli, Virgínia
Dobrovolski, Máx
Sinhoretic, Mario Alexandre Coelho
Ribeiro, Priscilla Busatoa do Monte
Bertacchinib, Lyvia Karla Cerci Ferreira
Mendonça, Márcio José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Self-etching adhesive
Bond strength
Bovine dentin
sistemas adesivos
Adesivo autocondicionante
Força de adesão
Dentes bovinos
topic Self-etching adhesive
Bond strength
Bovine dentin
sistemas adesivos
Adesivo autocondicionante
Força de adesão
Dentes bovinos
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength (BS) of different self-etching adhesive systems to bovine dentin.METHODS: For this purpose, 50 teeth were flattened with silicon carbide abrasive papers and randomly divided into 5 groups: SB – Single Bond Plus; Group AEO – Adper Easy One; Group ADH – AdheSE; Group ASE – Adper SE Plus and Group Clear – Clear Fill. After adhesive system application, 5 Tygon cylinders (1.8 mm×2 mm) were placed on the vestibular surface of each tooth, filled with resin composite (Filtek Z350) and light activated. Three composite resin cylinders were fabricated for each bovine crown, one being located in the incisal region, one in the middle third and one in the cervical region, totaling 30 composite resin test specimens (TS) for each group. The TS were submitted to the microshear bond strength test in a Universal Test Machine  Kratos), at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min.RESULTS: The BS was calculated and analyzed by ANOVA (one-way) and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). The highest BS values were obtained in Group SB and there were no significant differences between the adhesive systems tested in the middle and cervical thirds. In the fracture type analysis it was found that adhesive failure was dominant for all groups.CONCLUSION: The conventional two-step adhesive system SB presented the highest bond strength mean to bovine dentin for all the regions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Teste de resistência adesiva por microcisalhamento
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482
10.15448/1980-6523.2016.4.22482
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6523.2016.4.22482
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/22482/15801
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 31 No. 4 (2016); 158-163
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 31 n. 4 (2016); 158-163
1980-6523
0102-9460
10.15448/1980-6523.2016.4
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820876981764096