Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5457 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To evaluate the radiopacity produced by seven commercially available (AH Plus, Epiphany, Sealapex, Acroseal, Sealer 26, Endomethasone and Endofill) and one experimental (MBP) root canal sealers. Methods: Sealer radiopacity testing was performed according to ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57. Specimens were radiographed with an aluminum stepwedge, and the resulting images were digitalized. Radiographic densities expressed in Aluminum mm (mm Al) were compared using an ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: AH Plus (10 mm Al) and Epiphany (9.0 mm Al) were the most radiopaque root canal sealers, followed by Sealapex (8 mm Al), Endofill (7 mm Al), Endomethasone (7 mm Al), MBP (7 mm Al) and Sealer 26 (6 mm Al). Acroseal (5 mm Al) showed the smallest radiopacity among the tested sealers (P<0.05). Conclusion: The radiopacities of the tested sealers were above the minimum level recommended by ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_7ef8a6a2efa15f54826c040792ffa3ac |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5457 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealersMensuração digital da radiopacidade de diferentes cimentos obturadores resinosos e de base zinco-enólicaRadiopacityroot canal fillingdigital radiographysealerRadiopacidade de materiais obturadores de canais radicularesPurpose: To evaluate the radiopacity produced by seven commercially available (AH Plus, Epiphany, Sealapex, Acroseal, Sealer 26, Endomethasone and Endofill) and one experimental (MBP) root canal sealers. Methods: Sealer radiopacity testing was performed according to ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57. Specimens were radiographed with an aluminum stepwedge, and the resulting images were digitalized. Radiographic densities expressed in Aluminum mm (mm Al) were compared using an ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: AH Plus (10 mm Al) and Epiphany (9.0 mm Al) were the most radiopaque root canal sealers, followed by Sealapex (8 mm Al), Endofill (7 mm Al), Endomethasone (7 mm Al), MBP (7 mm Al) and Sealer 26 (6 mm Al). Acroseal (5 mm Al) showed the smallest radiopacity among the tested sealers (P<0.05). Conclusion: The radiopacities of the tested sealers were above the minimum level recommended by ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57.Objetivo: Avaliar a radiopacidade produzida por sete cimentos comercialmente disponíveis (AH Plus, Epiphany, Sealapex, Acroseal, Sealer 26, Endomethasone and Endofill) e um em estágio experimental (MBP). Metodologia: Depois de homogeneizados os materiais, o teste de radiopacidade foi executado conforme a especificação no 57 da ANSI/ADA. Radiografou-se os espécimes junto a uma escala de Alumínio e as imagens resultantes foram digitalizadas. As densidades radiográficas expressas em milímetros de Alumínio (mm Al) foram comparadas por meio da análise de variância e teste de Tukey (α=0.05). Resultados: Os cimentos AH Plus (10 mm Al) e Epiphany (9 mm Al) apresentaram as maiores radiopacidades seguidos pelo Sealapex (8 mm Al), Endofill (7 mm Al), Endométhasone (7 mm Al), MBP (7 mm Al) e Sealer 26 (6 mm Al). Acroseal (5 mm Al) mostrou a menor radiopacidade entre os cimentos testados (P<0.05). Conclusão: Concluiu-se que as diferentes radiopacidades dos cimentos testados estão acima do nível mínimo recomendado pela especificação nº 57 da ANSI/ADA.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2009-11-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5457Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2010); 74 - 77Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 25 n. 1 (2010); 74 - 771980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5457/4866Bodanezi, AugustoPereira, Adriana LustosaMunhoz, Etiene AndradeBernardineli, NorbertiMoraes, Ivaldo Gomes deBramante, Clovis Monteiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-11T12:48:37Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/5457Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-11T12:48:37Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers Mensuração digital da radiopacidade de diferentes cimentos obturadores resinosos e de base zinco-enólica |
title |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers |
spellingShingle |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers Bodanezi, Augusto Radiopacity root canal filling digital radiography sealer Radiopacidade de materiais obturadores de canais radiculares |
title_short |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers |
title_full |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers |
title_fullStr |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers |
title_sort |
Digital radiopacity measurement of different resin- and zinc oxide-based root canal sealers |
author |
Bodanezi, Augusto |
author_facet |
Bodanezi, Augusto Pereira, Adriana Lustosa Munhoz, Etiene Andrade Bernardineli, Norberti Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes de Bramante, Clovis Monteiro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Adriana Lustosa Munhoz, Etiene Andrade Bernardineli, Norberti Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes de Bramante, Clovis Monteiro |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bodanezi, Augusto Pereira, Adriana Lustosa Munhoz, Etiene Andrade Bernardineli, Norberti Moraes, Ivaldo Gomes de Bramante, Clovis Monteiro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Radiopacity root canal filling digital radiography sealer Radiopacidade de materiais obturadores de canais radiculares |
topic |
Radiopacity root canal filling digital radiography sealer Radiopacidade de materiais obturadores de canais radiculares |
description |
Purpose: To evaluate the radiopacity produced by seven commercially available (AH Plus, Epiphany, Sealapex, Acroseal, Sealer 26, Endomethasone and Endofill) and one experimental (MBP) root canal sealers. Methods: Sealer radiopacity testing was performed according to ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57. Specimens were radiographed with an aluminum stepwedge, and the resulting images were digitalized. Radiographic densities expressed in Aluminum mm (mm Al) were compared using an ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). Results: AH Plus (10 mm Al) and Epiphany (9.0 mm Al) were the most radiopaque root canal sealers, followed by Sealapex (8 mm Al), Endofill (7 mm Al), Endomethasone (7 mm Al), MBP (7 mm Al) and Sealer 26 (6 mm Al). Acroseal (5 mm Al) showed the smallest radiopacity among the tested sealers (P<0.05). Conclusion: The radiopacities of the tested sealers were above the minimum level recommended by ANSI/ADA Specification No. 57. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-11-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5457 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5457 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/5457/4866 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2010); 74 - 77 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 25 n. 1 (2010); 74 - 77 1980-6523 0102-9460 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820874939138048 |