Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Werneck, Rafael Dario
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Neisser, Maximiliano Piero
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554
Resumo: Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a feldspathic dental porcelain (IPS Classic Ivoclar) subjected to two polishing systems after simulation of occlusal adjustment. Methods: Twenty disk-shaped feldspathic ceramic (IPS Classic Ivoclar) specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer instructions and divided into two groups (A and B). The baseline surface roughness (Ra 0) of the glazed specimens was measured using a surface profilometer (Surtronic 3+). The surface was ground with diamond burs (PM82F and 0261PM), and the surface roughness was measured (Ra 1). Group A was treated with the Edenta diamond bur finishing system (EXA-Cerapol #352, #362 and Cerapol Super #372), and Group B was treated with the Tri Hawk silicon tip polishing system (Universal Fase 1 and Fase 2) before the final surface roughness measurement (Ra 2). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test at the 5% significance level. Results: Surface roughness mean and standard deviation values (in micrometer) were: Group A – Ra 0=0.21±0.07, Ra 1=0.66±0.07, Ra 2=0.23±0.07; and Group B – Ra 0=0.20±0.04, Ra 1=0.72±0.06, Ra 2=0.21±0.05). No significant differences were found between the polished groups and the glazed surface. Conclusion: According to the methods used, both polishing systems provided surface roughness similar to that of the original glazed surface. Key words: Polishing; porcelain; roughness
id PUC_RS-22_bb7899c322af516e9a0676e23649949a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/2554
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishingRugosidade superficial de uma porcelana feldspática odontológica após simulação de ajuste oclusal e polimentoPolishingporcelainroughnessCeramicspolishingPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a feldspathic dental porcelain (IPS Classic Ivoclar) subjected to two polishing systems after simulation of occlusal adjustment. Methods: Twenty disk-shaped feldspathic ceramic (IPS Classic Ivoclar) specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer instructions and divided into two groups (A and B). The baseline surface roughness (Ra 0) of the glazed specimens was measured using a surface profilometer (Surtronic 3+). The surface was ground with diamond burs (PM82F and 0261PM), and the surface roughness was measured (Ra 1). Group A was treated with the Edenta diamond bur finishing system (EXA-Cerapol #352, #362 and Cerapol Super #372), and Group B was treated with the Tri Hawk silicon tip polishing system (Universal Fase 1 and Fase 2) before the final surface roughness measurement (Ra 2). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test at the 5% significance level. Results: Surface roughness mean and standard deviation values (in micrometer) were: Group A – Ra 0=0.21±0.07, Ra 1=0.66±0.07, Ra 2=0.23±0.07; and Group B – Ra 0=0.20±0.04, Ra 1=0.72±0.06, Ra 2=0.21±0.05). No significant differences were found between the polished groups and the glazed surface. Conclusion: According to the methods used, both polishing systems provided surface roughness similar to that of the original glazed surface. Key words: Polishing; porcelain; roughnessObjetivo: O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a rugosidade superficial (Ra) de uma porcelana feldspática glazeada e submetida a dois sistemas de acabamento e polimento após simulação de ajuste oclusal. Metodologia: Vinte corpos-de-prova de porcelana feldspática glazeada (IPS Classic Ivoclar) foram confeccionados em forma de disco de acordo com as recomendações do fabricante e divididos em dois grupos (A e B). A leitura da rugosidade média superficial inicial (Ra 0) foi realizada com um rugosímetro (Surtronic 3+). Os corpos-de-prova foram desgastados com pontas diamantadas (PM82F e 0261PM) e a rugosidade superficial foi novamente aferida (Ra 1). O grupo A foi tratado com pontas de acabamento do sistema Edenta (EXA-Cerapol 352 e 362, Cerapol Super 372) e o grupo B com pontas de acabamento de silicone do sistema Tri Hawk (Universal Fase 1 e Fase 2), sendo realizadas novas leituras de rugosidade (Ra 2). Os dados foram analisados por ANOVA e teste de Tukey, ao nível de significância de 0,05. Resultados: Os valores médios de Ra e desvio-padrão (em micrometros) foram: Grupo A – Ra 0=0,21±0,07, Ra 1=0,66±0,07, Ra 2=0,23±0,07; e Grupo B – Ra 0=0,20±0,04, Ra 1=0,72±0,06, Ra 2=0,21±0,05. Não houve diferença estatística entre os tratamentos ou entre estes e a porcelana glazeada. Conclusão: Considerando a metodologia empregada, ambos os procedimentos de acabamento e polimento promoveram uma lisura superficial similar à porcelana glazeada original. Palavras-chave: Polimento; porcelana; rugosidadeEDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2008-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleexperimental, laboratoryapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2008); 166 - 169Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 23 n. 2 (2008); 166 - 1691980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554/3052Werneck, Rafael DarioNeisser, Maximiliano Pieroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-18T10:48:09Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/2554Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-18T10:48:09Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
Rugosidade superficial de uma porcelana feldspática odontológica após simulação de ajuste oclusal e polimento
title Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
spellingShingle Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
Werneck, Rafael Dario
Polishing
porcelain
roughness
Ceramics
polishing
title_short Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
title_full Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
title_fullStr Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
title_full_unstemmed Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
title_sort Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
author Werneck, Rafael Dario
author_facet Werneck, Rafael Dario
Neisser, Maximiliano Piero
author_role author
author2 Neisser, Maximiliano Piero
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Werneck, Rafael Dario
Neisser, Maximiliano Piero
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Polishing
porcelain
roughness
Ceramics
polishing
topic Polishing
porcelain
roughness
Ceramics
polishing
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a feldspathic dental porcelain (IPS Classic Ivoclar) subjected to two polishing systems after simulation of occlusal adjustment. Methods: Twenty disk-shaped feldspathic ceramic (IPS Classic Ivoclar) specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer instructions and divided into two groups (A and B). The baseline surface roughness (Ra 0) of the glazed specimens was measured using a surface profilometer (Surtronic 3+). The surface was ground with diamond burs (PM82F and 0261PM), and the surface roughness was measured (Ra 1). Group A was treated with the Edenta diamond bur finishing system (EXA-Cerapol #352, #362 and Cerapol Super #372), and Group B was treated with the Tri Hawk silicon tip polishing system (Universal Fase 1 and Fase 2) before the final surface roughness measurement (Ra 2). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test at the 5% significance level. Results: Surface roughness mean and standard deviation values (in micrometer) were: Group A – Ra 0=0.21±0.07, Ra 1=0.66±0.07, Ra 2=0.23±0.07; and Group B – Ra 0=0.20±0.04, Ra 1=0.72±0.06, Ra 2=0.21±0.05). No significant differences were found between the polished groups and the glazed surface. Conclusion: According to the methods used, both polishing systems provided surface roughness similar to that of the original glazed surface. Key words: Polishing; porcelain; roughness
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-06-22
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
experimental, laboratory
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554/3052
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2008); 166 - 169
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 23 n. 2 (2008); 166 - 169
1980-6523
0102-9460
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820874215620608