Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554 |
Resumo: | Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a feldspathic dental porcelain (IPS Classic Ivoclar) subjected to two polishing systems after simulation of occlusal adjustment. Methods: Twenty disk-shaped feldspathic ceramic (IPS Classic Ivoclar) specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer instructions and divided into two groups (A and B). The baseline surface roughness (Ra 0) of the glazed specimens was measured using a surface profilometer (Surtronic 3+). The surface was ground with diamond burs (PM82F and 0261PM), and the surface roughness was measured (Ra 1). Group A was treated with the Edenta diamond bur finishing system (EXA-Cerapol #352, #362 and Cerapol Super #372), and Group B was treated with the Tri Hawk silicon tip polishing system (Universal Fase 1 and Fase 2) before the final surface roughness measurement (Ra 2). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test at the 5% significance level. Results: Surface roughness mean and standard deviation values (in micrometer) were: Group A – Ra 0=0.21±0.07, Ra 1=0.66±0.07, Ra 2=0.23±0.07; and Group B – Ra 0=0.20±0.04, Ra 1=0.72±0.06, Ra 2=0.21±0.05). No significant differences were found between the polished groups and the glazed surface. Conclusion: According to the methods used, both polishing systems provided surface roughness similar to that of the original glazed surface. Key words: Polishing; porcelain; roughness |
id |
PUC_RS-22_bb7899c322af516e9a0676e23649949a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/2554 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishingRugosidade superficial de uma porcelana feldspática odontológica após simulação de ajuste oclusal e polimentoPolishingporcelainroughnessCeramicspolishingPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a feldspathic dental porcelain (IPS Classic Ivoclar) subjected to two polishing systems after simulation of occlusal adjustment. Methods: Twenty disk-shaped feldspathic ceramic (IPS Classic Ivoclar) specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer instructions and divided into two groups (A and B). The baseline surface roughness (Ra 0) of the glazed specimens was measured using a surface profilometer (Surtronic 3+). The surface was ground with diamond burs (PM82F and 0261PM), and the surface roughness was measured (Ra 1). Group A was treated with the Edenta diamond bur finishing system (EXA-Cerapol #352, #362 and Cerapol Super #372), and Group B was treated with the Tri Hawk silicon tip polishing system (Universal Fase 1 and Fase 2) before the final surface roughness measurement (Ra 2). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test at the 5% significance level. Results: Surface roughness mean and standard deviation values (in micrometer) were: Group A – Ra 0=0.21±0.07, Ra 1=0.66±0.07, Ra 2=0.23±0.07; and Group B – Ra 0=0.20±0.04, Ra 1=0.72±0.06, Ra 2=0.21±0.05). No significant differences were found between the polished groups and the glazed surface. Conclusion: According to the methods used, both polishing systems provided surface roughness similar to that of the original glazed surface. Key words: Polishing; porcelain; roughnessObjetivo: O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a rugosidade superficial (Ra) de uma porcelana feldspática glazeada e submetida a dois sistemas de acabamento e polimento após simulação de ajuste oclusal. Metodologia: Vinte corpos-de-prova de porcelana feldspática glazeada (IPS Classic Ivoclar) foram confeccionados em forma de disco de acordo com as recomendações do fabricante e divididos em dois grupos (A e B). A leitura da rugosidade média superficial inicial (Ra 0) foi realizada com um rugosímetro (Surtronic 3+). Os corpos-de-prova foram desgastados com pontas diamantadas (PM82F e 0261PM) e a rugosidade superficial foi novamente aferida (Ra 1). O grupo A foi tratado com pontas de acabamento do sistema Edenta (EXA-Cerapol 352 e 362, Cerapol Super 372) e o grupo B com pontas de acabamento de silicone do sistema Tri Hawk (Universal Fase 1 e Fase 2), sendo realizadas novas leituras de rugosidade (Ra 2). Os dados foram analisados por ANOVA e teste de Tukey, ao nível de significância de 0,05. Resultados: Os valores médios de Ra e desvio-padrão (em micrometros) foram: Grupo A – Ra 0=0,21±0,07, Ra 1=0,66±0,07, Ra 2=0,23±0,07; e Grupo B – Ra 0=0,20±0,04, Ra 1=0,72±0,06, Ra 2=0,21±0,05. Não houve diferença estatística entre os tratamentos ou entre estes e a porcelana glazeada. Conclusão: Considerando a metodologia empregada, ambos os procedimentos de acabamento e polimento promoveram uma lisura superficial similar à porcelana glazeada original. Palavras-chave: Polimento; porcelana; rugosidadeEDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2008-06-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleexperimental, laboratoryapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2008); 166 - 169Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 23 n. 2 (2008); 166 - 1691980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554/3052Werneck, Rafael DarioNeisser, Maximiliano Pieroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-18T10:48:09Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/2554Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-18T10:48:09Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing Rugosidade superficial de uma porcelana feldspática odontológica após simulação de ajuste oclusal e polimento |
title |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing |
spellingShingle |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing Werneck, Rafael Dario Polishing porcelain roughness Ceramics polishing |
title_short |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing |
title_full |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing |
title_fullStr |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing |
title_sort |
Surface roughness of a feldspathic dental porcelain after simulation of occlusal adjustment and polishing |
author |
Werneck, Rafael Dario |
author_facet |
Werneck, Rafael Dario Neisser, Maximiliano Piero |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Neisser, Maximiliano Piero |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Werneck, Rafael Dario Neisser, Maximiliano Piero |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Polishing porcelain roughness Ceramics polishing |
topic |
Polishing porcelain roughness Ceramics polishing |
description |
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra) of a feldspathic dental porcelain (IPS Classic Ivoclar) subjected to two polishing systems after simulation of occlusal adjustment. Methods: Twenty disk-shaped feldspathic ceramic (IPS Classic Ivoclar) specimens were fabricated according to the manufacturer instructions and divided into two groups (A and B). The baseline surface roughness (Ra 0) of the glazed specimens was measured using a surface profilometer (Surtronic 3+). The surface was ground with diamond burs (PM82F and 0261PM), and the surface roughness was measured (Ra 1). Group A was treated with the Edenta diamond bur finishing system (EXA-Cerapol #352, #362 and Cerapol Super #372), and Group B was treated with the Tri Hawk silicon tip polishing system (Universal Fase 1 and Fase 2) before the final surface roughness measurement (Ra 2). Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey’s test at the 5% significance level. Results: Surface roughness mean and standard deviation values (in micrometer) were: Group A – Ra 0=0.21±0.07, Ra 1=0.66±0.07, Ra 2=0.23±0.07; and Group B – Ra 0=0.20±0.04, Ra 1=0.72±0.06, Ra 2=0.21±0.05). No significant differences were found between the polished groups and the glazed surface. Conclusion: According to the methods used, both polishing systems provided surface roughness similar to that of the original glazed surface. Key words: Polishing; porcelain; roughness |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-06-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article experimental, laboratory |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2554/3052 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2008); 166 - 169 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 23 n. 2 (2008); 166 - 169 1980-6523 0102-9460 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820874215620608 |