Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/7797 |
Resumo: | Purpose: To determine the accuracy of different radiographic methods for bone height estimation at the mental foramen area. Methods: Twenty dry human hemimandibles were examed by using periapical and panoramic radiography, and computed tomography. An electronic digital caliper was used to measure the tracings obtained from the radiographies in three different times (groups A1, A2 and A3) and in the cross-sectioned hemimandibles (group B). Measurements consisted of: Measure 1 - from the upper limit of the alveolar ridge to the upper limit of the mental foramen; Measure 2 - from the upper limit of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the cortical bone of the base of the jaw; Measure 3 - from the upper limit of the alveolar ridge to the inferior limit of the cortical bone of the base of the jaw. Data were analyzed with Student-t and Friedman tests. Results: The average difference values in Measure 1 were 0.33 mm, 0.35 mm and 0.85 mm for the periapical radiography, computed tomography and panoramic radiography, respectively (confidence intervals of 0.17 mm to 0.49 mm, 0.18 mm to 0.53 mm and 0.38 mm to 1.32 mm, respectively). Panoramic radiographies showed the greatest differences in Measures 2 and 3, with average values of 1.05 mm and 1.93 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Periapical radiography and computed tomography showed the best accuracy. A safety margin for surgical purposes has been suggested. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_c2fc1a68d4b38eb7cce8ebc520cf70ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/7797 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen regionAcurácia de radiografia periapical, radiografia panorâmica e tomografia computadorizada para exame da região do forame mentualComputed tomographyradiographydental implantsdiagnostic imagingmental foramenDental imagingTomografia computadorizadaradiografiaimplantes dentáriosdiagnóstico por imagemforame mentualImaginologiadiagnósticoPurpose: To determine the accuracy of different radiographic methods for bone height estimation at the mental foramen area. Methods: Twenty dry human hemimandibles were examed by using periapical and panoramic radiography, and computed tomography. An electronic digital caliper was used to measure the tracings obtained from the radiographies in three different times (groups A1, A2 and A3) and in the cross-sectioned hemimandibles (group B). Measurements consisted of: Measure 1 - from the upper limit of the alveolar ridge to the upper limit of the mental foramen; Measure 2 - from the upper limit of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the cortical bone of the base of the jaw; Measure 3 - from the upper limit of the alveolar ridge to the inferior limit of the cortical bone of the base of the jaw. Data were analyzed with Student-t and Friedman tests. Results: The average difference values in Measure 1 were 0.33 mm, 0.35 mm and 0.85 mm for the periapical radiography, computed tomography and panoramic radiography, respectively (confidence intervals of 0.17 mm to 0.49 mm, 0.18 mm to 0.53 mm and 0.38 mm to 1.32 mm, respectively). Panoramic radiographies showed the greatest differences in Measures 2 and 3, with average values of 1.05 mm and 1.93 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Periapical radiography and computed tomography showed the best accuracy. A safety margin for surgical purposes has been suggested.Objetivo: Determinar a acurácia de diferentes métodos radiográficos para estimação de altura óssea na região do forame mentual. Metodologia: Vinte hemi-mandíbulas humanas, secas, foram examinadas por radiografia periapical e panorâmica e tomografia computadorizada. Um paquímetro digital foi usado para medir os traçados obtidos das radiografias em três diferentes tempos (grupos A1, A2 e A3) e nas hemi-mandíbulas seccionadas transversalmente (grupo B). As medições foram: Medida 1 – do limite superior da crista óssea ao limite superior do forame mentual; Medida 2 – do limite superior do forame mentual ao limite inferior do osso cortical da base da mandíbula; Medida 3 - do limite superior da crista óssea ao limite inferior do osso cortical da base da mandíbula. Os dados foram analisados por teste t de Student e teste de Friedman. Resultados: Os valores médios de diferença na Medida 1 foram 0,33 mm, 0,35 mm e 0,85 mm para a radiografia periapical, tomografia computadorizada e radiografia panorâmica, respectivamente (intervalos de confiança de 0,17 a 0,49 mm, 0,18 a 0,53 mm e 0,38 a 1,32 mm, respectivamente). As radiografias panorâmicas mostraram as maiores diferenças nas Medidas 2 e 3, com valores médios de 1,05 mm e 1,93 mm, respectivamente. Conclusão: A radiografia periapical e a tomografia computadorizada mostraram a melhor acurácia. Sugere-se uma margem de segurança em caso de cirurgias.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2010-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleex-vivolaboratorialapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/7797Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2010); 282 - 287Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 25 n. 3 (2010); 282 - 2871980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/7797/5549Bahlis, AlexandreMezzomo, Luís AndréBoeckel, DanielCosta, Nilza Pereira daTeixeira, Eduardo Roliminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-11T12:30:19Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/7797Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-11T12:30:19Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region Acurácia de radiografia periapical, radiografia panorâmica e tomografia computadorizada para exame da região do forame mentual |
title |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region |
spellingShingle |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region Bahlis, Alexandre Computed tomography radiography dental implants diagnostic imaging mental foramen Dental imaging Tomografia computadorizada radiografia implantes dentários diagnóstico por imagem forame mentual Imaginologia diagnóstico |
title_short |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region |
title_full |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region |
title_sort |
Accuracy of periapical radiography, panoramic radiography and computed tomography for examining the mental foramen region |
author |
Bahlis, Alexandre |
author_facet |
Bahlis, Alexandre Mezzomo, Luís André Boeckel, Daniel Costa, Nilza Pereira da Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mezzomo, Luís André Boeckel, Daniel Costa, Nilza Pereira da Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bahlis, Alexandre Mezzomo, Luís André Boeckel, Daniel Costa, Nilza Pereira da Teixeira, Eduardo Rolim |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Computed tomography radiography dental implants diagnostic imaging mental foramen Dental imaging Tomografia computadorizada radiografia implantes dentários diagnóstico por imagem forame mentual Imaginologia diagnóstico |
topic |
Computed tomography radiography dental implants diagnostic imaging mental foramen Dental imaging Tomografia computadorizada radiografia implantes dentários diagnóstico por imagem forame mentual Imaginologia diagnóstico |
description |
Purpose: To determine the accuracy of different radiographic methods for bone height estimation at the mental foramen area. Methods: Twenty dry human hemimandibles were examed by using periapical and panoramic radiography, and computed tomography. An electronic digital caliper was used to measure the tracings obtained from the radiographies in three different times (groups A1, A2 and A3) and in the cross-sectioned hemimandibles (group B). Measurements consisted of: Measure 1 - from the upper limit of the alveolar ridge to the upper limit of the mental foramen; Measure 2 - from the upper limit of the mental foramen to the inferior limit of the cortical bone of the base of the jaw; Measure 3 - from the upper limit of the alveolar ridge to the inferior limit of the cortical bone of the base of the jaw. Data were analyzed with Student-t and Friedman tests. Results: The average difference values in Measure 1 were 0.33 mm, 0.35 mm and 0.85 mm for the periapical radiography, computed tomography and panoramic radiography, respectively (confidence intervals of 0.17 mm to 0.49 mm, 0.18 mm to 0.53 mm and 0.38 mm to 1.32 mm, respectively). Panoramic radiographies showed the greatest differences in Measures 2 and 3, with average values of 1.05 mm and 1.93 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Periapical radiography and computed tomography showed the best accuracy. A safety margin for surgical purposes has been suggested. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-10-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article ex-vivo laboratorial |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/7797 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/7797 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/7797/5549 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 25 No. 3 (2010); 282 - 287 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 25 n. 3 (2010); 282 - 287 1980-6523 0102-9460 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820875437211648 |