Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Miranda, Jean Soares
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Malta, Natália Veloso, de Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís Almeida, Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e, Machado, João Paulo Barros, Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28749
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: to evaluated the influence of two types of low-fusing porcelain glaze application on the surface of a zirconia ceramics stabilized by yttrium (Y-TZP).METHODS: Y-TZP specimens were divided into five groups (n=5) according the surface treatments: control (CO), no treatment was performed; application of a thin low-fusing porcelain glass layer by the powder/liquid technique (GPL); GPL followed by 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching (GPL-HF); glaze spray application (GS); GS followed by 10% HF etching (GS-HF). Roughness measurements contact angle, x-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis were performed.RESULTS: ANOVA and Tukey tests revealed that GPL had significantly lower contact angle values than the other groups (GPL:50.31º; GPL-HF: 72.73º; GS-HF: 81.73º; CO: 96.48º; GS:101.30º; p=0.001). GPL-HF presented a significant higher roughness (Ra/Rq: 2658.0/3367.0 ηm; p=0.001) than the other groups (GPL: 872.1/1162.0 ηm; GS-HF: 383.0/603.6 ηm; GS: 303.4/391.3 ηm; CO:263.4/339.1 ηm). The X-ray diffraction analysis just tetragonal phase in all groups. EDS and SEM analysis show a highest amount of silica on GPL and GPL-HF surface.CONCLUSION: the application of the low-fusing porcelain glaze by the powder/liquid technique followed by the HF etching promoted a better surface to micromechanical and chemical adhesion.
id PUC_RS-22_dbf9b6ba1b6b0ea369e6c26ec0731de0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28749
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?Qual técnica de aplicação de glaze de baixa fusão é melhor para criar uma superfície vítrea sobre a cerâmica Y-TZP?zirconia ceramicsnanofilmsurface treatment.cerâmica de zircôniananofilmetratamento de superfície.OBJECTIVE: to evaluated the influence of two types of low-fusing porcelain glaze application on the surface of a zirconia ceramics stabilized by yttrium (Y-TZP).METHODS: Y-TZP specimens were divided into five groups (n=5) according the surface treatments: control (CO), no treatment was performed; application of a thin low-fusing porcelain glass layer by the powder/liquid technique (GPL); GPL followed by 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching (GPL-HF); glaze spray application (GS); GS followed by 10% HF etching (GS-HF). Roughness measurements contact angle, x-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis were performed.RESULTS: ANOVA and Tukey tests revealed that GPL had significantly lower contact angle values than the other groups (GPL:50.31º; GPL-HF: 72.73º; GS-HF: 81.73º; CO: 96.48º; GS:101.30º; p=0.001). GPL-HF presented a significant higher roughness (Ra/Rq: 2658.0/3367.0 ηm; p=0.001) than the other groups (GPL: 872.1/1162.0 ηm; GS-HF: 383.0/603.6 ηm; GS: 303.4/391.3 ηm; CO:263.4/339.1 ηm). The X-ray diffraction analysis just tetragonal phase in all groups. EDS and SEM analysis show a highest amount of silica on GPL and GPL-HF surface.CONCLUSION: the application of the low-fusing porcelain glaze by the powder/liquid technique followed by the HF etching promoted a better surface to micromechanical and chemical adhesion.OBJETIVO: Avaliar a influência de dois tipos de aplicação de glaze de baixa fusão na superfície de uma cerâmica de zircônia estabilizada por ítrio (Y-TZP).METODOLOGIA: Os espécimes de Y-TZP foram divididos em cinco grupos (n=5) de acordo com os tratamentos de superfície: controle (CO), nenhum tratamento foi realizado; aplicação de uma fina camada de glaze de baixa fusão pela técnica de pó/líquido (GPL); GPL seguida por condicinamento com ácido fluorídrico 10% (HF) (GPL-HF); aplicação de glaze spray (GS); GS seguido condicinamento com HF (GS-HF). Análise do ângulo de contato, aferição de rugosidade, difração de raios X, espectroscopia dispersiva de energia (EDS) e microscópio eletrônico de varredura (SEM) foram realizados.RESULTADOS: Os exames ANOVA e Tukey revelaram que a GPL apresentou valores de ângulo de contato significativamente menores que os demais grupos (GPL: 50,31º; GPL-HF: 72,73º; GS-HF: 81,73º; CO: 96,48º; GS: 101,30º; p=0,001). GPL-HF apresentou uma rugosidade significativamente maior (Ra/Rq: 2658.0/3367.0 ηm; p=0,001) do que os outros grupos (GPL: 872.1/1162.0 ηm; GS-HF: 383.0/603.6 ηm; GS: 303.4/391.3 ηm; CO: 263.4/339.1 ηm). A análise de difracção de raios X apenas a fase tetragonal em todos os grupos. A análise EDS e SEM mostra uma quantidade grande de sílica na superfície GPL e GPL-HF.CONCLUSÃO: A aplicação do glaze pela técnica de pó/líquido seguida do condicionamento com HF promoveu uma melhor superfície para a adesão micromecânica e química.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2018-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articlelaboratory researchapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2874910.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28749Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2017); 174-179Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 4 (2017); 174-1791980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2017.4reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28749/17008Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiranda, Jean SoaresMalta, Natália Velosode Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís AlmeidaSouza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção eMachado, João Paulo BarrosLeite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira2018-07-25T17:42:36Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28749Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2018-07-25T17:42:36Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
Qual técnica de aplicação de glaze de baixa fusão é melhor para criar uma superfície vítrea sobre a cerâmica Y-TZP?
title Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
spellingShingle Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
Miranda, Jean Soares
zirconia ceramics
nanofilm
surface treatment.
cerâmica de zircônia
nanofilme
tratamento de superfície.
title_short Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
title_full Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
title_fullStr Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
title_full_unstemmed Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
title_sort Which low-fusing porcelain glaze treatment technique is better to promote a vitreous surface on Y-TZP ceramic?
author Miranda, Jean Soares
author_facet Miranda, Jean Soares
Malta, Natália Veloso
de Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís Almeida
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e
Machado, João Paulo Barros
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
author_role author
author2 Malta, Natália Veloso
de Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís Almeida
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e
Machado, João Paulo Barros
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Miranda, Jean Soares
Malta, Natália Veloso
de Carvalho, Ronaldo Luís Almeida
Souza, Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção e
Machado, João Paulo Barros
Leite, Fabíola Pessôa Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv zirconia ceramics
nanofilm
surface treatment.
cerâmica de zircônia
nanofilme
tratamento de superfície.
topic zirconia ceramics
nanofilm
surface treatment.
cerâmica de zircônia
nanofilme
tratamento de superfície.
description OBJECTIVE: to evaluated the influence of two types of low-fusing porcelain glaze application on the surface of a zirconia ceramics stabilized by yttrium (Y-TZP).METHODS: Y-TZP specimens were divided into five groups (n=5) according the surface treatments: control (CO), no treatment was performed; application of a thin low-fusing porcelain glass layer by the powder/liquid technique (GPL); GPL followed by 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching (GPL-HF); glaze spray application (GS); GS followed by 10% HF etching (GS-HF). Roughness measurements contact angle, x-ray diffraction, energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis were performed.RESULTS: ANOVA and Tukey tests revealed that GPL had significantly lower contact angle values than the other groups (GPL:50.31º; GPL-HF: 72.73º; GS-HF: 81.73º; CO: 96.48º; GS:101.30º; p=0.001). GPL-HF presented a significant higher roughness (Ra/Rq: 2658.0/3367.0 ηm; p=0.001) than the other groups (GPL: 872.1/1162.0 ηm; GS-HF: 383.0/603.6 ηm; GS: 303.4/391.3 ηm; CO:263.4/339.1 ηm). The X-ray diffraction analysis just tetragonal phase in all groups. EDS and SEM analysis show a highest amount of silica on GPL and GPL-HF surface.CONCLUSION: the application of the low-fusing porcelain glaze by the powder/liquid technique followed by the HF etching promoted a better surface to micromechanical and chemical adhesion.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
laboratory research
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28749
10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28749
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28749
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4.28749
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/28749/17008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Odonto Ciência
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Odonto Ciência
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 4 (2017); 174-179
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 4 (2017); 174-179
1980-6523
0102-9460
10.15448/1980-6523.2017.4
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820877087670272