Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/26479 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to histopathologically analyze, in subcutaneous connective tissue in rats, a propolis solution for cavity cleansing and its toxicity through hemolytic and Artemia franciscana tests.METHODS: Fifteen male rats were selected and randomly distributed in three experimental periods (07, 30 and 45 days), in which each animal received the four treatment groups in rounds: Group I – Propolis I; Group II – Propolis II; Group III – Calcium Hydroxide Water and Group IV – 2% Chlorexidine; the sides of the tube were the control group. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results showed, in terms of biocompatibility, that all materials presented a significant reduction of the inflammatory infiltrate and an increase of the thickness in the collagen fibers. It may be suggested, in decreasing order of biocompatibility, the use of following materials: calcium hydroxide-water, 2% chlorexidine, propolis I and propolis II.RESULTS: In the cytotoxicity test using A. franciscana, the propolis extract showed high toxicity when tested at concentrations and in the hemolytic activity test the propolis I extract showed greater activity than propolis II.CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the use of propolis as a cavity cleansing solution for shallow and medium cavities similar to 2% chlorexidine. |
id |
PUC_RS-22_e0fc098d020402713ba1cd5cc072f874 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/26479 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-22 |
network_name_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansingBiocompatibilidade da própolis no tecido subcutâneo de ratos: um possível biomaterial de limpeza de cavidadeMaterials testingPropolisDental cavity liningDetergentsNatural ProductsTeste de materiaisPrópolisForramento da cavidade dentáriaDetergentesOBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to histopathologically analyze, in subcutaneous connective tissue in rats, a propolis solution for cavity cleansing and its toxicity through hemolytic and Artemia franciscana tests.METHODS: Fifteen male rats were selected and randomly distributed in three experimental periods (07, 30 and 45 days), in which each animal received the four treatment groups in rounds: Group I – Propolis I; Group II – Propolis II; Group III – Calcium Hydroxide Water and Group IV – 2% Chlorexidine; the sides of the tube were the control group. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results showed, in terms of biocompatibility, that all materials presented a significant reduction of the inflammatory infiltrate and an increase of the thickness in the collagen fibers. It may be suggested, in decreasing order of biocompatibility, the use of following materials: calcium hydroxide-water, 2% chlorexidine, propolis I and propolis II.RESULTS: In the cytotoxicity test using A. franciscana, the propolis extract showed high toxicity when tested at concentrations and in the hemolytic activity test the propolis I extract showed greater activity than propolis II.CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the use of propolis as a cavity cleansing solution for shallow and medium cavities similar to 2% chlorexidine.OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar histopatologicamente, em tecido conjuntivo subcutâneo de ratos, uma solução de própolis para a limpeza de cavidades e sua toxicidade através dos testes de hemólise e Artemia franciscana.METODOLOGIA: Foram utilizados 15 ratos machos, selecionados e distribuídos aleatoriamente em três grupos (n=5) em períodos experimentais (7, 30 e 45 dias), em que cada animal recebeu os quatro grupos de tratamento em forma de rodízio: Grupo I – Própolis I; Grupo II – Própolis II; Grupo III – Água de Hidróxido de Cálcio e Grupo IV – Clorexidina a 2%; as laterais do tubo foram o grupo controle. Os dados foram analisados pela estatística descritiva.RESULTADOS: Todos os materiais apresentaram uma redução significativa do infiltrado inflamatório e aumento da espessura das fibras colágenas. No teste de citotoxicidade de Artemia franciscana, o extrato de própolis apresentou alta toxicidade e no teste de atividade hemolítica o extrato de Própolis I mostrou-se mais ativo que o da Própolis II.CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo mostrou a biocompatibilidade da própolis, sugerindo seu uso como solução de limpeza em cavidade cavidades rasas e médias semelhante à clorexidina a 2%.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2017-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/2647910.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.26479Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017); 60-65Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 2 (2017); 60-651980-65230102-946010.15448/1980-6523.2017.2reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/26479/16165Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciênciainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Almeida, Mailza CostaFerreira, Luiz Carlos de LimaVenâncio, Gisely Naurade Souza, Risonilce Fernandes SilvaLima, Emerson SilvaConde, Nikeila Chacon de OliveiraBandeira, Maria Fulgência Costa Lima2018-04-04T16:33:36Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/26479Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2018-04-04T16:33:36Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing Biocompatibilidade da própolis no tecido subcutâneo de ratos: um possível biomaterial de limpeza de cavidade |
title |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing |
spellingShingle |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing de Almeida, Mailza Costa Materials testing Propolis Dental cavity lining Detergents Natural Products Teste de materiais Própolis Forramento da cavidade dentária Detergentes |
title_short |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing |
title_full |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing |
title_fullStr |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing |
title_sort |
Biocompatibility of propolis in subcutaneous tissue of rats: a possible biomaterial for cavity cleansing |
author |
de Almeida, Mailza Costa |
author_facet |
de Almeida, Mailza Costa Ferreira, Luiz Carlos de Lima Venâncio, Gisely Naura de Souza, Risonilce Fernandes Silva Lima, Emerson Silva Conde, Nikeila Chacon de Oliveira Bandeira, Maria Fulgência Costa Lima |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ferreira, Luiz Carlos de Lima Venâncio, Gisely Naura de Souza, Risonilce Fernandes Silva Lima, Emerson Silva Conde, Nikeila Chacon de Oliveira Bandeira, Maria Fulgência Costa Lima |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Almeida, Mailza Costa Ferreira, Luiz Carlos de Lima Venâncio, Gisely Naura de Souza, Risonilce Fernandes Silva Lima, Emerson Silva Conde, Nikeila Chacon de Oliveira Bandeira, Maria Fulgência Costa Lima |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Materials testing Propolis Dental cavity lining Detergents Natural Products Teste de materiais Própolis Forramento da cavidade dentária Detergentes |
topic |
Materials testing Propolis Dental cavity lining Detergents Natural Products Teste de materiais Própolis Forramento da cavidade dentária Detergentes |
description |
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to histopathologically analyze, in subcutaneous connective tissue in rats, a propolis solution for cavity cleansing and its toxicity through hemolytic and Artemia franciscana tests.METHODS: Fifteen male rats were selected and randomly distributed in three experimental periods (07, 30 and 45 days), in which each animal received the four treatment groups in rounds: Group I – Propolis I; Group II – Propolis II; Group III – Calcium Hydroxide Water and Group IV – 2% Chlorexidine; the sides of the tube were the control group. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The results showed, in terms of biocompatibility, that all materials presented a significant reduction of the inflammatory infiltrate and an increase of the thickness in the collagen fibers. It may be suggested, in decreasing order of biocompatibility, the use of following materials: calcium hydroxide-water, 2% chlorexidine, propolis I and propolis II.RESULTS: In the cytotoxicity test using A. franciscana, the propolis extract showed high toxicity when tested at concentrations and in the hemolytic activity test the propolis I extract showed greater activity than propolis II.CONCLUSION: The present study suggests the use of propolis as a cavity cleansing solution for shallow and medium cavities similar to 2% chlorexidine. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/26479 10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.26479 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/26479 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2.26479 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/26479/16165 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odonto Ciência |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017); 60-65 Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 32 n. 2 (2017); 60-65 1980-6523 0102-9460 10.15448/1980-6523.2017.2 reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
collection |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||odontociencia@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1754820877020561408 |