Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Yévenes, Ismael
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Alvarez, Sonia Rivera, Jara, Miguel Neira, Wolfenson, Paula Maass, Smith, Ljubica Petrasic
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista odonto ciência (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/4952
Resumo: Purpose: Antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine (CHX) seem to be the most effective chemical agents for plaque control. The CHX concentration is usually 0.12% or 0.20%, but formulations with lower concentrations of CHX (0.05%) in combination with other active agents such as sodium fluoride (0.05%) or cetyl pyridinium chloride (0.05%) (Cpc) are available. The aim of this study was to compare plaque formation at 24 hours after the use of 0.1% CHX mouthrinse-gel and mouthrinses containing 0.12% and 0.05% CHX plus other active agents. Methods: A controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial was designed. Thirty subjects underwent four consecutive experimental phases with four treatments: CHX 0.1% + hydroxymethylcellulose 2.5% (HMC), CHX 0.12% + alcohol, CHX 0.12% + 0.05% sodium fluoride, and CHX 0.05% + 0.05% Cpc. On the day of study, the subjects discontinued all other oral hygiene habits and were randomly assigned for treatment with the experimental mouthwash. Each experimental phase was preceded by a 28-day washout period. Plaque formation was recorded after one undisturbed day. Results: Formulations of CHX 0.12% with alcohol and sodium fluoride and CHX 0.1% + HMC 2.5% reduced de novo plaque formation to a greater extent than the mouthwash with CHX 0.05% + Cpc (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The 0.1% CHX gel presents an anti-plaque efficacy similar to that of mouthwashes containing 0.12% CHX and other active agents, and was more effective at inhibiting plaque formation than the mouthwash containing 0.05% CHX with Cpc.
id PUC_RS-22_e8c764729d5754cdb1414fbf6f7a3d26
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4952
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-22
network_name_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formationComparação de enxaguatórios de clorexidina e outros agentes ativos com enxaguatório-gel de clorexidina sobre a formação de biofilmeChlorhexidinemouthrinse-gelplaque indexmouthrinsesplaque inhibitionMouthwashesPurpose: Antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine (CHX) seem to be the most effective chemical agents for plaque control. The CHX concentration is usually 0.12% or 0.20%, but formulations with lower concentrations of CHX (0.05%) in combination with other active agents such as sodium fluoride (0.05%) or cetyl pyridinium chloride (0.05%) (Cpc) are available. The aim of this study was to compare plaque formation at 24 hours after the use of 0.1% CHX mouthrinse-gel and mouthrinses containing 0.12% and 0.05% CHX plus other active agents. Methods: A controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial was designed. Thirty subjects underwent four consecutive experimental phases with four treatments: CHX 0.1% + hydroxymethylcellulose 2.5% (HMC), CHX 0.12% + alcohol, CHX 0.12% + 0.05% sodium fluoride, and CHX 0.05% + 0.05% Cpc. On the day of study, the subjects discontinued all other oral hygiene habits and were randomly assigned for treatment with the experimental mouthwash. Each experimental phase was preceded by a 28-day washout period. Plaque formation was recorded after one undisturbed day. Results: Formulations of CHX 0.12% with alcohol and sodium fluoride and CHX 0.1% + HMC 2.5% reduced de novo plaque formation to a greater extent than the mouthwash with CHX 0.05% + Cpc (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The 0.1% CHX gel presents an anti-plaque efficacy similar to that of mouthwashes containing 0.12% CHX and other active agents, and was more effective at inhibiting plaque formation than the mouthwash containing 0.05% CHX with Cpc.Objetivo: Enxaguatórios contendo clorexidina (CHX) parecem ser os mais eficazes agentes químicos para controle de placa. A concentração de CHX geralmente é de 0.12% ou 0.20%, mas formulações de clorexidina em concentrações mais baixas (0.05%) com outros agentes ativos, tais como fluoreto de sódio (0.05%), cloreto de cetilpiridínio (0.05%) estão disponíveis atualmente. Este estudo teve por objetivo comparar a eficácia de gel de clorexidina a 0.1% com enxaguatórios contendo 0.12% e 0.05% CHX e outros agentes ativos, em relação ao crescimento de placa bacteriana em 24 horas. Metodologia: Um ensaio clínico com delineamento cruzado, randomizado, controlado e duplo-cego foi concebido. Trinta sujeitos foram submetidos a quatro fases experimentais consecutivas com quatro tratamentos (bochechos): CHX 0.1% + HMC 2.5%, 0.12% CHX + álcool, CHX 0.12% + 0.05% de fluoreto de sódio e CHX 0.05% + 0.05% cloreto de cetilpiridínio. No dia de estudo, os indivíduos interromperam todas as medidas de higiene oral e foram tratados os bochechos experimentais aleatoriamente. Cada fase experimental foi precedida por um período de 28 dias de washout. A formação de placa foi registrada depois de um dia sem disturbio de formação. Resultados: As formulações de CHX 0.12% com álcool e fluoreto de sódio e gel foram eficientes em retardar a formação de placa e foram superiores (P < 0,05) para a CHX 0.05% com cloreto de cetilpiridínio. Conclusão: O gel de clorexidina 0,1% para bochechos apresenta uma eficácia antiplaca semelhante aos bochechos de 0.12% CHX com outros agentes ativos, sendo superior aos bochechos de clorexidina a 0.05% com cloreto de cetilpiridínio.EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS2009-07-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articlecontrolled, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trialapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/4952Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 24 No. 4 (2009); 345 - 348Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 24 n. 4 (2009); 345 - 3481980-65230102-9460reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSenghttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/4952/4772Yévenes, IsmaelAlvarez, Sonia RiveraJara, Miguel NeiraWolfenson, Paula MaassSmith, Ljubica Petrasicinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-11-11T12:57:32Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/4952Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/foPRIhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/oai||odontociencia@pucrs.br1980-65230102-9460opendoar:2013-11-11T12:57:32Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
Comparação de enxaguatórios de clorexidina e outros agentes ativos com enxaguatório-gel de clorexidina sobre a formação de biofilme
title Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
spellingShingle Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
Yévenes, Ismael
Chlorhexidine
mouthrinse-gel
plaque index
mouthrinses
plaque inhibition
Mouthwashes
title_short Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
title_full Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
title_fullStr Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
title_sort Comparison of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine and other active agents with chlorhexidine mouthrinse-gel: effects on de novo plaque formation
author Yévenes, Ismael
author_facet Yévenes, Ismael
Alvarez, Sonia Rivera
Jara, Miguel Neira
Wolfenson, Paula Maass
Smith, Ljubica Petrasic
author_role author
author2 Alvarez, Sonia Rivera
Jara, Miguel Neira
Wolfenson, Paula Maass
Smith, Ljubica Petrasic
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Yévenes, Ismael
Alvarez, Sonia Rivera
Jara, Miguel Neira
Wolfenson, Paula Maass
Smith, Ljubica Petrasic
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chlorhexidine
mouthrinse-gel
plaque index
mouthrinses
plaque inhibition
Mouthwashes
topic Chlorhexidine
mouthrinse-gel
plaque index
mouthrinses
plaque inhibition
Mouthwashes
description Purpose: Antiseptic mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine (CHX) seem to be the most effective chemical agents for plaque control. The CHX concentration is usually 0.12% or 0.20%, but formulations with lower concentrations of CHX (0.05%) in combination with other active agents such as sodium fluoride (0.05%) or cetyl pyridinium chloride (0.05%) (Cpc) are available. The aim of this study was to compare plaque formation at 24 hours after the use of 0.1% CHX mouthrinse-gel and mouthrinses containing 0.12% and 0.05% CHX plus other active agents. Methods: A controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial was designed. Thirty subjects underwent four consecutive experimental phases with four treatments: CHX 0.1% + hydroxymethylcellulose 2.5% (HMC), CHX 0.12% + alcohol, CHX 0.12% + 0.05% sodium fluoride, and CHX 0.05% + 0.05% Cpc. On the day of study, the subjects discontinued all other oral hygiene habits and were randomly assigned for treatment with the experimental mouthwash. Each experimental phase was preceded by a 28-day washout period. Plaque formation was recorded after one undisturbed day. Results: Formulations of CHX 0.12% with alcohol and sodium fluoride and CHX 0.1% + HMC 2.5% reduced de novo plaque formation to a greater extent than the mouthwash with CHX 0.05% + Cpc (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The 0.1% CHX gel presents an anti-plaque efficacy similar to that of mouthwashes containing 0.12% CHX and other active agents, and was more effective at inhibiting plaque formation than the mouthwash containing 0.05% CHX with Cpc.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-07-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/4952
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/4952
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/fo/article/view/4952/4772
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitária da PUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Odonto Ciência; Vol. 24 No. 4 (2009); 345 - 348
Revista Odonto Ciência; v. 24 n. 4 (2009); 345 - 348
1980-6523
0102-9460
reponame:Revista odonto ciência (Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Revista odonto ciência (Online)
collection Revista odonto ciência (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista odonto ciência (Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||odontociencia@pucrs.br
_version_ 1754820874877272064