Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hamerski, Bruna
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Conversas & Controvérsias
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/article/view/35482
Resumo: This paper aims to demonstrate the level of Popular participation in the Brazilian case, in respect to the plebiscite instruments, references, popular initiatives, recall and popular veto, from the perspective of Sherry Arnstein’s theory. It assumes the importance of binding participatory management practices, where it is possible to verify in a solid way the popular participation. In methodological terms, content analysis was performed, based on the instruments of participation. Subsequently, it was investigated in which levels of the participation scale the instruments fit in. The results demonstrate a democratic deficit, considering that the present instruments do not fit in the upper level of the participation scale. It is concluded that Popular Participation can still go through several advances, both on the part of Civil Society and on the part of the State, in the sense of regulamentation of more practical practices of social control and ambitious in the point of view of Popular Participation.
id PUC_RS-24_54fd096e3f5f22137600510f0abc123c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/35482
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-24
network_name_str Conversas & Controvérsias
repository_id_str
spelling Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular vetoParticipação Popular no Brasil: uma análise sobre o plebiscito, referendo, iniciativa popular, recall e veto popular.Social ControlDemocracyPopular participationCitizenshipControle SocialDemocracia.Participação PopularCidadaniaThis paper aims to demonstrate the level of Popular participation in the Brazilian case, in respect to the plebiscite instruments, references, popular initiatives, recall and popular veto, from the perspective of Sherry Arnstein’s theory. It assumes the importance of binding participatory management practices, where it is possible to verify in a solid way the popular participation. In methodological terms, content analysis was performed, based on the instruments of participation. Subsequently, it was investigated in which levels of the participation scale the instruments fit in. The results demonstrate a democratic deficit, considering that the present instruments do not fit in the upper level of the participation scale. It is concluded that Popular Participation can still go through several advances, both on the part of Civil Society and on the part of the State, in the sense of regulamentation of more practical practices of social control and ambitious in the point of view of Popular Participation.O artigo visa demonstrar o nível de Participação Popular, no caso brasileiro, a respeito dos instrumentos plebiscito, referendo, iniciativa popular, recall e veto popular, sob a perspectiva da teoria de Sherry Arnstein. Parte-se do pressuposto da importância de práticas de gestão participativa vinculantes, onde se possa verificar de forma concreta a Participação Popular. Em termos metodológicos, partiu-se de análise de conteúdo, da regulamentação dos instrumentos de participação. Posteriormente, buscou-se verificar em que degraus da escala de participação se encaixam os instrumentos. Os resultados demonstram um déficit democrático, tendo em vista que os instrumentos vigentes não se enquadram em degraus superiores da escala de participação. Conclui-se que a Participação Popular no caso brasileiro ainda necessita passar por muitos avanços, tanto por parte da Sociedade Civil, pressionando a agenda governamental, quanto por parte do Estado, no sentido de regulamentação de práticas mais eficazes de controle social e ambiciosas no ponto de vista da Participação Popular.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2020-03-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/article/view/3548210.15448/2178-5694.2020.1.35482Conversas & Controvérsias; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020); e35482Conversas & Controvérsias; v. 7 n. 1 (2020); e354822178-569410.15448/2178-5694.2020.1reponame:Conversas & Controvérsiasinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/article/view/35482/26229Copyright (c) 2020 Conversas & Controvérsiashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHamerski, Bruna2020-09-17T15:02:31Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/35482Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/indexPUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/oaiteresa.marques@pucrs.br2178-56942178-5694opendoar:2020-09-17T15:02:31Conversas & Controvérsias - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
Participação Popular no Brasil: uma análise sobre o plebiscito, referendo, iniciativa popular, recall e veto popular.
title Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
spellingShingle Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
Hamerski, Bruna
Social Control
Democracy
Popular participation
Citizenship
Controle Social
Democracia.
Participação Popular
Cidadania
title_short Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
title_full Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
title_fullStr Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
title_full_unstemmed Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
title_sort Popular participation in Brazil: an analysis of the plebiscite, referendum, popular initiative, recall and popular veto
author Hamerski, Bruna
author_facet Hamerski, Bruna
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hamerski, Bruna
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Social Control
Democracy
Popular participation
Citizenship
Controle Social
Democracia.
Participação Popular
Cidadania
topic Social Control
Democracy
Popular participation
Citizenship
Controle Social
Democracia.
Participação Popular
Cidadania
description This paper aims to demonstrate the level of Popular participation in the Brazilian case, in respect to the plebiscite instruments, references, popular initiatives, recall and popular veto, from the perspective of Sherry Arnstein’s theory. It assumes the importance of binding participatory management practices, where it is possible to verify in a solid way the popular participation. In methodological terms, content analysis was performed, based on the instruments of participation. Subsequently, it was investigated in which levels of the participation scale the instruments fit in. The results demonstrate a democratic deficit, considering that the present instruments do not fit in the upper level of the participation scale. It is concluded that Popular Participation can still go through several advances, both on the part of Civil Society and on the part of the State, in the sense of regulamentation of more practical practices of social control and ambitious in the point of view of Popular Participation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/article/view/35482
10.15448/2178-5694.2020.1.35482
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/article/view/35482
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/2178-5694.2020.1.35482
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/conversasecontroversias/article/view/35482/26229
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Conversas & Controvérsias
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Conversas & Controvérsias
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Conversas & Controvérsias; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020); e35482
Conversas & Controvérsias; v. 7 n. 1 (2020); e35482
2178-5694
10.15448/2178-5694.2020.1
reponame:Conversas & Controvérsias
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Conversas & Controvérsias
collection Conversas & Controvérsias
repository.name.fl_str_mv Conversas & Controvérsias - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv teresa.marques@pucrs.br
_version_ 1797054071050338304

Registros relacionados