Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/40497 |
Resumo: | Aims: the goal was to identify the most prevalent indications of cesarean section in pregnant women classified as Robson 1, comparing motherly variables, obstetric background and perinatal outcomes.Methods: cross-sectional analytical study, evaluating the electronic medical records of birthing women classified as Robson 1. The quantitative variables were compared using Student’s T Test or Mann Whitney, the qualitative ones were applied to the Chi-square Test or Fisher’s Exact.Results: of the 2267 eligible women in the study 570 (25,1%) had C-section. The most prevalent indications of C-section were fetal distress numbering 213 (37,4%) of the reports and cephalopelvic disproportion reaching as high as 212 (37,2%) cases. The relevant variables to the outcome were: age (odds ratio 1,0), gestational age (1,4), Pregestational Body Mass Index (1,6 in overweight and 1,8 seen in obesity) and hypertensive syndrome (3,6).Conclusion: some pregnant and obstetric characteristics directly affect the indication of C-sections. |
id |
PUC_RS-25_73366cdec78f2c7d4f218f932d564931 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/40497 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-25 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1Indicações de cesárea nas gestantes classificadas como Robson 1cesarean sectionlabor obstetricparturition deliveryobstetric natural childbirthcesáreatrabalho de partopartoparto obstétricoparto normalAims: the goal was to identify the most prevalent indications of cesarean section in pregnant women classified as Robson 1, comparing motherly variables, obstetric background and perinatal outcomes.Methods: cross-sectional analytical study, evaluating the electronic medical records of birthing women classified as Robson 1. The quantitative variables were compared using Student’s T Test or Mann Whitney, the qualitative ones were applied to the Chi-square Test or Fisher’s Exact.Results: of the 2267 eligible women in the study 570 (25,1%) had C-section. The most prevalent indications of C-section were fetal distress numbering 213 (37,4%) of the reports and cephalopelvic disproportion reaching as high as 212 (37,2%) cases. The relevant variables to the outcome were: age (odds ratio 1,0), gestational age (1,4), Pregestational Body Mass Index (1,6 in overweight and 1,8 seen in obesity) and hypertensive syndrome (3,6).Conclusion: some pregnant and obstetric characteristics directly affect the indication of C-sections.Objetivos: os objetivos foram identificar as indicações mais prevalentes de cesárea em parturientes Robson 1, comparando variáveis maternas, antecedentes obstétricos e resultados perinatais.Métodos: estudo analítico observacional transversal, onde avaliou-se o Livro de Partos e prontuários eletrônicos das gestantes em trabalho de parto, classificadas como Robson 1. As variáveis quantitativas foram comparadas utilizando-se Teste T de Student ou Mann Whitney, às qualitativas foi empregado teste Qui-quadrado ou Exato de Fisher.Resultados: elegíveis 2267 gestantes, sendo 570 (25,1%) cesáreas. As indicações mais prevalentes de cesariana foram: sofrimento fetal, em 213 (37,4%) dos casos, e desproporção cefalopélvica, em 212 (37,2%). As variáveis relevantes para o desfecho do parto foram: idade materna (razão de chance 1,0), idade gestacional (1,4), índice de massa corpórea pré-gestacional (1,6 em sobrepeso e 1,8 em obesidade) e presença de síndrome hipertensiva (aumentou 3,6).Conclusão: conclui-se que algumas características maternas e obstétricas afetam diretamente a indicação de cesariana.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2021-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/4049710.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.40497Scientia Medica; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2021): Single Volume; e40497Scientia Medica; v. 31 n. 1 (2021): Volume Único; e404971980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2021.1reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/40497/27270Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Medicahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMelo, João Pedro deGarcia, Fernanda StellutiSalazar, Amanda PenteadoKosorus, Kátia2022-01-31T16:33:02Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/40497Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2022-01-31T16:33:02Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 Indicações de cesárea nas gestantes classificadas como Robson 1 |
title |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 |
spellingShingle |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 Melo, João Pedro de cesarean section labor obstetric parturition delivery obstetric natural childbirth cesárea trabalho de parto parto parto obstétrico parto normal |
title_short |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 |
title_full |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 |
title_fullStr |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 |
title_sort |
Indication of cesarean section on pregnant women classified as Robson 1 |
author |
Melo, João Pedro de |
author_facet |
Melo, João Pedro de Garcia, Fernanda Stelluti Salazar, Amanda Penteado Kosorus, Kátia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garcia, Fernanda Stelluti Salazar, Amanda Penteado Kosorus, Kátia |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Melo, João Pedro de Garcia, Fernanda Stelluti Salazar, Amanda Penteado Kosorus, Kátia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cesarean section labor obstetric parturition delivery obstetric natural childbirth cesárea trabalho de parto parto parto obstétrico parto normal |
topic |
cesarean section labor obstetric parturition delivery obstetric natural childbirth cesárea trabalho de parto parto parto obstétrico parto normal |
description |
Aims: the goal was to identify the most prevalent indications of cesarean section in pregnant women classified as Robson 1, comparing motherly variables, obstetric background and perinatal outcomes.Methods: cross-sectional analytical study, evaluating the electronic medical records of birthing women classified as Robson 1. The quantitative variables were compared using Student’s T Test or Mann Whitney, the qualitative ones were applied to the Chi-square Test or Fisher’s Exact.Results: of the 2267 eligible women in the study 570 (25,1%) had C-section. The most prevalent indications of C-section were fetal distress numbering 213 (37,4%) of the reports and cephalopelvic disproportion reaching as high as 212 (37,2%) cases. The relevant variables to the outcome were: age (odds ratio 1,0), gestational age (1,4), Pregestational Body Mass Index (1,6 in overweight and 1,8 seen in obesity) and hypertensive syndrome (3,6).Conclusion: some pregnant and obstetric characteristics directly affect the indication of C-sections. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/40497 10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.40497 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/40497 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1.40497 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/40497/27270 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Medica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Scientia Medica http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica; Vol. 31 No. 1 (2021): Single Volume; e40497 Scientia Medica; v. 31 n. 1 (2021): Volume Único; e40497 1980-6108 1806-5562 10.15448/1980-6108.2021.1 reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1809101752492883968 |