Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041 |
Resumo: | AIMS: To analyze risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative period, complications and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement (VR) surgeries.METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital, included patients of both sexes, older than 18 years, submitted to CABG or VR. Data on risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative periods, postoperative complications and mortality were collected from patients' records. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the variables of interest between the CABG and VR groups, considering p≤0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Of 210 records analyzed, 129 (61.4%) patients had performed CABG and 81 (38.5%) had performed VR. In the intraoperative variables, the following were observed in CABG and in VR, respectively (in minutes): ejection fraction 60.2±11.9 vs. 66.2±11.2 (p=0.001); extracorporeal circulation time 75.4±25.1 vs. 105.4±121.5 (p<0.001); aortic clamping time 60.7±39.3 vs. 75.7 ± 26.2 (p=0.003); time of surgery 200.1±76.3 vs. 198.3±71.5 (p=0.865); time of mechanical ventilation 629.1±296.4 vs. 574.4±135.6 (p=0.076). In the postoperative period, the length of stay in the coronary intensive care unit was 2.5±1.8 days in the CABG and 2.5±0.8 days in the VR (p=0.779). Ninety-six (75%) of the patients submitted to CABG and 46 (59%) of the patients submitted to VR had spontaneous heart beat recovery (p=0.020). The majority of patients did not present complications, both in CABG (n=105, 81.4%) and in VR (n=59, 72.8%) (p=0.561). Mortality was 2 (1.6%) in CABG and 4 (4.9%) in VR (p=0.274). The total death rate during the hospital stay was 2.9%.CONCLUSIONS: In the analysis of the CABG and VT surgeries there were differences during the intraoperative period, but no significant differences in postoperative complications and in hospital mortality were identified. Descriptive and comparative analysis of these two distinct surgical techniques, involving patients with differences in their clinical characteristics, allowed the knowledge of their peculiarities, which could contribute to the planning of care and cardiac rehabilitation of the patient. |
id |
PUC_RS-25_aed1e669bc7c3e3c2c6cdc4e14073ae5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28041 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-25 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeriesAnálise do período intra e pós-operatório, complicações e mortalidade nas cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio e de troca valvarheart surgeryintraoperative periodpostoperative periodcomplicationsmortality.cirurgia cardíacaperíodo intraoperatórioperíodo pós-operatóriocomplicaçõesmortalidade.AIMS: To analyze risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative period, complications and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement (VR) surgeries.METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital, included patients of both sexes, older than 18 years, submitted to CABG or VR. Data on risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative periods, postoperative complications and mortality were collected from patients' records. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the variables of interest between the CABG and VR groups, considering p≤0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Of 210 records analyzed, 129 (61.4%) patients had performed CABG and 81 (38.5%) had performed VR. In the intraoperative variables, the following were observed in CABG and in VR, respectively (in minutes): ejection fraction 60.2±11.9 vs. 66.2±11.2 (p=0.001); extracorporeal circulation time 75.4±25.1 vs. 105.4±121.5 (p<0.001); aortic clamping time 60.7±39.3 vs. 75.7 ± 26.2 (p=0.003); time of surgery 200.1±76.3 vs. 198.3±71.5 (p=0.865); time of mechanical ventilation 629.1±296.4 vs. 574.4±135.6 (p=0.076). In the postoperative period, the length of stay in the coronary intensive care unit was 2.5±1.8 days in the CABG and 2.5±0.8 days in the VR (p=0.779). Ninety-six (75%) of the patients submitted to CABG and 46 (59%) of the patients submitted to VR had spontaneous heart beat recovery (p=0.020). The majority of patients did not present complications, both in CABG (n=105, 81.4%) and in VR (n=59, 72.8%) (p=0.561). Mortality was 2 (1.6%) in CABG and 4 (4.9%) in VR (p=0.274). The total death rate during the hospital stay was 2.9%.CONCLUSIONS: In the analysis of the CABG and VT surgeries there were differences during the intraoperative period, but no significant differences in postoperative complications and in hospital mortality were identified. Descriptive and comparative analysis of these two distinct surgical techniques, involving patients with differences in their clinical characteristics, allowed the knowledge of their peculiarities, which could contribute to the planning of care and cardiac rehabilitation of the patient.OBJETIVOS: Analisar fatores de risco, comorbidades, período intra e pós-operatório, complicações e mortalidade nas cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM) e de troca valvar (TV).MÉTODOS: Um estudo transversal retrospectivo, realizado em um hospital geral, incluiu pacientes de ambos os sexos, maiores de 18 anos, submetidos à CRM ou TV. Os dados foram coletados dos prontuários dos pacientes. Foram levantados fatores de risco, comorbidades, variáveis intra e pós-operatórias, complicações e mortalidade. Para análise estatística foram aplicados os testes T de Student e Qui-quadrado de Pearson para comparar as variáveis de interesse entre os grupos CRM e TV, considerando como significativo p≤0,05.RESULTADOS: De 210 prontuários analisados, 129 (61,4%) pacientes haviam sido submetidos à CRM e 81 (38,5%) à TV. Nas variáveis intraoperatórias, observaram-se na CRM e na TV, respectivamente (em minutos): fração de ejeção 60,2±11,9 vs. 66,2±11,2 (p=0,001); tempo de circulação extracorpórea 75,4±25,1 vs. 105,4±121,5 (p<0,001); tempo de clampeamento de aorta 60,7±39,3 vs. 75,7±26,2 (p=0,003); tempo de cirurgia 200,1±76,3 vs. 198,3±71,5 (p=0,865); tempo de ventilação mecânica 629,1±296,4 vs. 574,4±135,6 (p=0,076). No pós-operatório, o tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva coronariana foi de 2,5±1,8 dias na CRM e de 2,5±0,8 dias na TV (p=0,779). Noventa e seis (75%) pacientes submetidos à CRM e 46 (59%) pacientes submetidos à TV tiveram recuperação espontânea dos batimentos cardíacos (p=0,020). A maioria dos pacientes não apresentou complicações, tanto na CRM (n=105; 81,4%) quanto na TV (n=59; 72,8%) (p=0.561). A mortalidade foi de 2 (1,6%) na CRM e de 4 (4,9%) na TV (p=0,274). A taxa de óbito total durante o período de internação hospitalar foi de 2,9%. CONCLUSÕES: Na análise das cirurgias CRM e TV houve diferenças durante o momento intraoperatório, porém não se identificaram diferenças significativas nas complicações pós-operatórias e na mortalidade hospitalar. A análise descritiva e comparativa dessas duas técnicas cirúrgicas distintas, envolvendo pacientes com diferenças em suas características clínicas, permitiu o conhecimento das suas peculiaridades, podendo contribuir para o planejamento da assistência e da reabilitação cardíaca do paciente.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2017-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/2804110.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28041Scientia Medica; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2017); ID28041Scientia Medica; v. 27 n. 4 (2017); ID280411980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2017.4reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041/16287Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Medicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHeck, Leila Gisleide SehnDallazen, Fernandada Cruz, Dante ThoméBerwanger, Silvana AgnolletoWinkelmann, Eliane Roseli2017-12-18T21:23:26Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28041Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2017-12-18T21:23:26Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries Análise do período intra e pós-operatório, complicações e mortalidade nas cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio e de troca valvar |
title |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn heart surgery intraoperative period postoperative period complications mortality. cirurgia cardíaca período intraoperatório período pós-operatório complicações mortalidade. |
title_short |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries |
title_full |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries |
title_sort |
Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries |
author |
Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn |
author_facet |
Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn Dallazen, Fernanda da Cruz, Dante Thomé Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dallazen, Fernanda da Cruz, Dante Thomé Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn Dallazen, Fernanda da Cruz, Dante Thomé Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
heart surgery intraoperative period postoperative period complications mortality. cirurgia cardíaca período intraoperatório período pós-operatório complicações mortalidade. |
topic |
heart surgery intraoperative period postoperative period complications mortality. cirurgia cardíaca período intraoperatório período pós-operatório complicações mortalidade. |
description |
AIMS: To analyze risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative period, complications and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement (VR) surgeries.METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital, included patients of both sexes, older than 18 years, submitted to CABG or VR. Data on risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative periods, postoperative complications and mortality were collected from patients' records. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the variables of interest between the CABG and VR groups, considering p≤0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Of 210 records analyzed, 129 (61.4%) patients had performed CABG and 81 (38.5%) had performed VR. In the intraoperative variables, the following were observed in CABG and in VR, respectively (in minutes): ejection fraction 60.2±11.9 vs. 66.2±11.2 (p=0.001); extracorporeal circulation time 75.4±25.1 vs. 105.4±121.5 (p<0.001); aortic clamping time 60.7±39.3 vs. 75.7 ± 26.2 (p=0.003); time of surgery 200.1±76.3 vs. 198.3±71.5 (p=0.865); time of mechanical ventilation 629.1±296.4 vs. 574.4±135.6 (p=0.076). In the postoperative period, the length of stay in the coronary intensive care unit was 2.5±1.8 days in the CABG and 2.5±0.8 days in the VR (p=0.779). Ninety-six (75%) of the patients submitted to CABG and 46 (59%) of the patients submitted to VR had spontaneous heart beat recovery (p=0.020). The majority of patients did not present complications, both in CABG (n=105, 81.4%) and in VR (n=59, 72.8%) (p=0.561). Mortality was 2 (1.6%) in CABG and 4 (4.9%) in VR (p=0.274). The total death rate during the hospital stay was 2.9%.CONCLUSIONS: In the analysis of the CABG and VT surgeries there were differences during the intraoperative period, but no significant differences in postoperative complications and in hospital mortality were identified. Descriptive and comparative analysis of these two distinct surgical techniques, involving patients with differences in their clinical characteristics, allowed the knowledge of their peculiarities, which could contribute to the planning of care and cardiac rehabilitation of the patient. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041 10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28041 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28041 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041/16287 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Medica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Medica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2017); ID28041 Scientia Medica; v. 27 n. 4 (2017); ID28041 1980-6108 1806-5562 10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4 reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1809101751425433600 |