Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Dallazen, Fernanda, da Cruz, Dante Thomé, Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto, Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041
Resumo: AIMS: To analyze risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative period, complications and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement (VR) surgeries.METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital, included patients of both sexes, older than 18 years, submitted to CABG or VR. Data on risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative periods, postoperative complications and mortality were collected from patients' records. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the variables of interest between the CABG and VR groups, considering p≤0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Of 210 records analyzed, 129 (61.4%) patients had performed CABG and 81 (38.5%) had performed VR. In the intraoperative variables, the following were observed in CABG and in VR, respectively (in minutes): ejection fraction 60.2±11.9 vs. 66.2±11.2 (p=0.001); extracorporeal circulation time 75.4±25.1 vs. 105.4±121.5 (p<0.001); aortic clamping time 60.7±39.3 vs. 75.7 ± 26.2 (p=0.003); time of surgery 200.1±76.3 vs. 198.3±71.5 (p=0.865); time of mechanical ventilation 629.1±296.4 vs. 574.4±135.6 (p=0.076). In the postoperative period, the length of stay in the coronary intensive care unit was 2.5±1.8 days in the CABG and 2.5±0.8 days in the VR (p=0.779). Ninety-six (75%) of the patients submitted to CABG and 46 (59%) of the patients submitted to VR had spontaneous heart beat recovery (p=0.020). The majority of patients did not present complications, both in CABG (n=105, 81.4%) and in VR (n=59, 72.8%) (p=0.561). Mortality was 2 (1.6%) in CABG and 4 (4.9%) in VR (p=0.274). The total death rate during the hospital stay was 2.9%.CONCLUSIONS: In the analysis of the CABG and VT surgeries there were differences during the intraoperative period, but no significant differences in postoperative complications and in hospital mortality were identified. Descriptive and comparative analysis of these two distinct surgical techniques, involving patients with differences in their clinical characteristics, allowed the knowledge of their peculiarities, which could contribute to the planning of care and cardiac rehabilitation of the patient.
id PUC_RS-25_aed1e669bc7c3e3c2c6cdc4e14073ae5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28041
network_acronym_str PUC_RS-25
network_name_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeriesAnálise do período intra e pós-operatório, complicações e mortalidade nas cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio e de troca valvarheart surgeryintraoperative periodpostoperative periodcomplicationsmortality.cirurgia cardíacaperíodo intraoperatórioperíodo pós-operatóriocomplicaçõesmortalidade.AIMS: To analyze risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative period, complications and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement (VR) surgeries.METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital, included patients of both sexes, older than 18 years, submitted to CABG or VR. Data on risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative periods, postoperative complications and mortality were collected from patients' records. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the variables of interest between the CABG and VR groups, considering p≤0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Of 210 records analyzed, 129 (61.4%) patients had performed CABG and 81 (38.5%) had performed VR. In the intraoperative variables, the following were observed in CABG and in VR, respectively (in minutes): ejection fraction 60.2±11.9 vs. 66.2±11.2 (p=0.001); extracorporeal circulation time 75.4±25.1 vs. 105.4±121.5 (p<0.001); aortic clamping time 60.7±39.3 vs. 75.7 ± 26.2 (p=0.003); time of surgery 200.1±76.3 vs. 198.3±71.5 (p=0.865); time of mechanical ventilation 629.1±296.4 vs. 574.4±135.6 (p=0.076). In the postoperative period, the length of stay in the coronary intensive care unit was 2.5±1.8 days in the CABG and 2.5±0.8 days in the VR (p=0.779). Ninety-six (75%) of the patients submitted to CABG and 46 (59%) of the patients submitted to VR had spontaneous heart beat recovery (p=0.020). The majority of patients did not present complications, both in CABG (n=105, 81.4%) and in VR (n=59, 72.8%) (p=0.561). Mortality was 2 (1.6%) in CABG and 4 (4.9%) in VR (p=0.274). The total death rate during the hospital stay was 2.9%.CONCLUSIONS: In the analysis of the CABG and VT surgeries there were differences during the intraoperative period, but no significant differences in postoperative complications and in hospital mortality were identified. Descriptive and comparative analysis of these two distinct surgical techniques, involving patients with differences in their clinical characteristics, allowed the knowledge of their peculiarities, which could contribute to the planning of care and cardiac rehabilitation of the patient.OBJETIVOS: Analisar fatores de risco, comorbidades, período intra e pós-operatório, complicações e mortalidade nas cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM) e de troca valvar (TV).MÉTODOS: Um estudo transversal retrospectivo, realizado em um hospital geral, incluiu pacientes de ambos os sexos, maiores de 18 anos, submetidos à CRM ou TV. Os dados foram coletados dos prontuários dos pacientes. Foram levantados fatores de risco, comorbidades, variáveis intra e pós-operatórias, complicações e mortalidade. Para análise estatística foram aplicados os testes T de Student e Qui-quadrado de Pearson para comparar as variáveis de interesse entre os grupos CRM e TV, considerando como significativo p≤0,05.RESULTADOS: De 210 prontuários analisados, 129 (61,4%) pacientes haviam sido submetidos à CRM e 81 (38,5%) à TV. Nas variáveis intraoperatórias, observaram-se na CRM e na TV, respectivamente (em minutos): fração de ejeção 60,2±11,9 vs. 66,2±11,2 (p=0,001); tempo de circulação extracorpórea 75,4±25,1 vs. 105,4±121,5 (p<0,001); tempo de clampeamento de aorta 60,7±39,3 vs. 75,7±26,2 (p=0,003); tempo de cirurgia 200,1±76,3 vs. 198,3±71,5 (p=0,865); tempo de ventilação mecânica 629,1±296,4 vs. 574,4±135,6 (p=0,076). No pós-operatório, o tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva coronariana foi de 2,5±1,8 dias na CRM e de 2,5±0,8 dias na TV (p=0,779). Noventa e seis (75%) pacientes submetidos à CRM e 46 (59%) pacientes submetidos à TV tiveram recuperação espontânea dos batimentos cardíacos (p=0,020). A maioria dos pacientes não apresentou complicações, tanto na CRM (n=105; 81,4%) quanto na TV (n=59; 72,8%) (p=0.561). A mortalidade foi de 2 (1,6%) na CRM e de 4 (4,9%) na TV (p=0,274). A taxa de óbito total durante o período de internação hospitalar foi de 2,9%.  CONCLUSÕES: Na análise das cirurgias CRM e TV houve diferenças durante o momento intraoperatório, porém não se identificaram diferenças significativas nas complicações pós-operatórias e na mortalidade hospitalar. A análise descritiva e comparativa dessas duas técnicas cirúrgicas distintas, envolvendo pacientes com diferenças em suas características clínicas, permitiu o conhecimento das suas peculiaridades, podendo contribuir para o planejamento da assistência e da reabilitação cardíaca do paciente.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2017-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/2804110.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28041Scientia Medica; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2017); ID28041Scientia Medica; v. 27 n. 4 (2017); ID280411980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2017.4reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041/16287Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Medicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHeck, Leila Gisleide SehnDallazen, Fernandada Cruz, Dante ThoméBerwanger, Silvana AgnolletoWinkelmann, Eliane Roseli2017-12-18T21:23:26Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/28041Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2017-12-18T21:23:26Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
Análise do período intra e pós-operatório, complicações e mortalidade nas cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio e de troca valvar
title Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
spellingShingle Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn
heart surgery
intraoperative period
postoperative period
complications
mortality.
cirurgia cardíaca
período intraoperatório
período pós-operatório
complicações
mortalidade.
title_short Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
title_full Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
title_fullStr Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
title_sort Analysis of the intra and postoperative period, complications and mortality in the coronary artery bypass grafting and valve replacement surgeries
author Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn
author_facet Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn
Dallazen, Fernanda
da Cruz, Dante Thomé
Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto
Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli
author_role author
author2 Dallazen, Fernanda
da Cruz, Dante Thomé
Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto
Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Heck, Leila Gisleide Sehn
Dallazen, Fernanda
da Cruz, Dante Thomé
Berwanger, Silvana Agnolleto
Winkelmann, Eliane Roseli
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv heart surgery
intraoperative period
postoperative period
complications
mortality.
cirurgia cardíaca
período intraoperatório
período pós-operatório
complicações
mortalidade.
topic heart surgery
intraoperative period
postoperative period
complications
mortality.
cirurgia cardíaca
período intraoperatório
período pós-operatório
complicações
mortalidade.
description AIMS: To analyze risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative period, complications and mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement (VR) surgeries.METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study, carried out in a general hospital, included patients of both sexes, older than 18 years, submitted to CABG or VR. Data on risk factors, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative periods, postoperative complications and mortality were collected from patients' records. For statistical analysis, Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the variables of interest between the CABG and VR groups, considering p≤0.05 as significant.RESULTS: Of 210 records analyzed, 129 (61.4%) patients had performed CABG and 81 (38.5%) had performed VR. In the intraoperative variables, the following were observed in CABG and in VR, respectively (in minutes): ejection fraction 60.2±11.9 vs. 66.2±11.2 (p=0.001); extracorporeal circulation time 75.4±25.1 vs. 105.4±121.5 (p<0.001); aortic clamping time 60.7±39.3 vs. 75.7 ± 26.2 (p=0.003); time of surgery 200.1±76.3 vs. 198.3±71.5 (p=0.865); time of mechanical ventilation 629.1±296.4 vs. 574.4±135.6 (p=0.076). In the postoperative period, the length of stay in the coronary intensive care unit was 2.5±1.8 days in the CABG and 2.5±0.8 days in the VR (p=0.779). Ninety-six (75%) of the patients submitted to CABG and 46 (59%) of the patients submitted to VR had spontaneous heart beat recovery (p=0.020). The majority of patients did not present complications, both in CABG (n=105, 81.4%) and in VR (n=59, 72.8%) (p=0.561). Mortality was 2 (1.6%) in CABG and 4 (4.9%) in VR (p=0.274). The total death rate during the hospital stay was 2.9%.CONCLUSIONS: In the analysis of the CABG and VT surgeries there were differences during the intraoperative period, but no significant differences in postoperative complications and in hospital mortality were identified. Descriptive and comparative analysis of these two distinct surgical techniques, involving patients with differences in their clinical characteristics, allowed the knowledge of their peculiarities, which could contribute to the planning of care and cardiac rehabilitation of the patient.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041
10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28041
url https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041
identifier_str_mv 10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4.28041
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/28041/16287
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Medica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Scientia Medica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica; Vol. 27 No. 4 (2017); ID28041
Scientia Medica; v. 27 n. 4 (2017); ID28041
1980-6108
1806-5562
10.15448/1980-6108.2017.4
reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron:PUC_RS
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
instacron_str PUC_RS
institution PUC_RS
reponame_str Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
collection Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br
_version_ 1809101751425433600