Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/19272 |
Resumo: | Aims: To assess neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with positive diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 522 postpartum women, among whom 255 presented with GDM, diagnosed in accordance with the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, and 267 did not have GDM. The patients in the latter group were randomly selected. Associations were established between GDM and adverse neonatal outcomes, including prematurity, macrosomia, low Apgar score, neonatal hypoglycemia, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Maternal characteristics such as age, pre-gestational body mass index, weight gain, parity, and mode of delivery were also analyzed for the adjustment of confounding factors. After confirming the normal distribution of the assessed characteristics, the quantitative variables were analyzed by Student’s t test and the qualitative ones by the chi-squared test. The data on the effect of GDM on perinatal outcomes were presented as relative risks using contingency tables, and robust Poisson’s regression models were used to adjust the confounding variablesResults: Newborn infants of women with GDM had a higher risk of preterm birth (relative risk [RR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.1-5.0), macrosomia (RR 1.6; 95%CI 1.1-2.5), and neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 4.2; 95%CI 1.4-12.3). The relationship between GDM and low one-minute and five-minute Apgar scores was not significant (RR 1.9; 95%CI 0.9-3.8 and RR 2.1; 95%CI 0.4-11.3, respectively). There was no significant increased risk of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (RR 1.4; 95%CI 0.6-3.2).Conclusions: The risks of prematurity, macrosomia, and neonatal hypoglycemia were higher in pregnant women with GDM diagnosed according to the IADPSG criteria. |
id |
PUC_RS-25_bb21eff3690c536cfbf22283f8b6dea4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/19272 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_RS-25 |
network_name_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort studyImpacto do diabetes gestacional nos desfechos neonatais: uma coorte retrospectivaGestational diabetesInfantnewbornPregnant womenPregnancyhigh-riskPregnancy outcome.Obstetrics and GynecologyDiabetes gestacionalRecém-nascidoGestantesGestação de alto riscoResultado da gravidez.Ginecologia e ObstetríciaAims: To assess neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with positive diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 522 postpartum women, among whom 255 presented with GDM, diagnosed in accordance with the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, and 267 did not have GDM. The patients in the latter group were randomly selected. Associations were established between GDM and adverse neonatal outcomes, including prematurity, macrosomia, low Apgar score, neonatal hypoglycemia, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Maternal characteristics such as age, pre-gestational body mass index, weight gain, parity, and mode of delivery were also analyzed for the adjustment of confounding factors. After confirming the normal distribution of the assessed characteristics, the quantitative variables were analyzed by Student’s t test and the qualitative ones by the chi-squared test. The data on the effect of GDM on perinatal outcomes were presented as relative risks using contingency tables, and robust Poisson’s regression models were used to adjust the confounding variablesResults: Newborn infants of women with GDM had a higher risk of preterm birth (relative risk [RR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.1-5.0), macrosomia (RR 1.6; 95%CI 1.1-2.5), and neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 4.2; 95%CI 1.4-12.3). The relationship between GDM and low one-minute and five-minute Apgar scores was not significant (RR 1.9; 95%CI 0.9-3.8 and RR 2.1; 95%CI 0.4-11.3, respectively). There was no significant increased risk of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (RR 1.4; 95%CI 0.6-3.2).Conclusions: The risks of prematurity, macrosomia, and neonatal hypoglycemia were higher in pregnant women with GDM diagnosed according to the IADPSG criteria.Objetivos: Avaliar os desfechos neonatais em gestantes diagnosticadas com diabetes mellitus gestacional (DMG). Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva com 522 puérperas, sendo 255 pacientes com diagnóstico de DMG pelos critérios da International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) e 267 pacientes sem DMG, tendo sido este último grupo selecionado por sorteio. Foram avaliadas associações entre DMG e a ocorrência de desfechos neonatais adversos, entre os quais prematuridade, peso excessivo para a idade gestacional, índice de Apgar baixo, hipoglicemia neonatal e internação em unidade de tratamento intensivo neonatal. Além disso, variáveis maternas como idade, índice de massa corporal pré-gestacional, ganho de peso, paridade e via do parto, foram avaliadas para ajuste de confundimento. Uma vez confirmada a normalidade de distribuição das características estudadas, foi usado o teste T para as variáveis quantitativas e o teste qui-quadrado para as qualitativas. Para avaliar o impacto do DMG nos resultados perinatais, foram calculados os riscos relativos a partir de tabelas de contingência e foram construídos modelos de regressão de Poisson com variação robusta para ajustar as variáveis de confundimento.Resultados: Os recém-nascidos das gestantes com DMG apresentaram maior risco de prematuridade (risco relativo [RR] 2,3; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95% 1,1-5,0), peso excessivo para a idade gestacional (RR 1,6; IC95% 1,1-2,5) e hipoglicemia neonatal (RR 4,2; IC95% 1,4-12,3). As associações entre DMG e escores baixos de Apgar no primeiro e no quinto minuto não se mostraram significativas: RR 1,9; IC95% 0,9-3,8 e RR 2,1; IC95% 0,4-11,3, respectivamente. Não houve aumento do risco de internação em unidade de tratamento intensivo neonatal dos recém-nascidos de gestantes diabéticas (RR 1,4; IC95% 0,6-3,2).Conclusões: Na amostra estudada, os riscos de prematuridade, peso do recém-nascido excessivo para a idade gestacional e hipoglicemia foram maiores nos recém-nascidos de gestantes com DMG diagnosticada pelos critérios da IADPSG.Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS2015-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/1927210.15448/1980-6108.2015.1.19272Scientia Medica; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2015); ID19272Scientia Medica; v. 25 n. 1 (2015); ID192721980-61081806-556210.15448/1980-6108.2015.1reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)instacron:PUC_RSporhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/19272/12843Amaral, Augusto RadünzSilva, Jean CarlFerreira, Bruna da Silvae Silva, Mariana RibeiroBertini, Anna Mariainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2015-09-28T22:25:13Zoai:ojs.revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br:article/19272Revistahttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/PUBhttps://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/oaiscientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br1980-61081806-5562opendoar:2015-09-28T22:25:13Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study Impacto do diabetes gestacional nos desfechos neonatais: uma coorte retrospectiva |
title |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
spellingShingle |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study Amaral, Augusto Radünz Gestational diabetes Infant newborn Pregnant women Pregnancy high-risk Pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology Diabetes gestacional Recém-nascido Gestantes Gestação de alto risco Resultado da gravidez. Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
title_short |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort |
Impact of gestational diabetes on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
author |
Amaral, Augusto Radünz |
author_facet |
Amaral, Augusto Radünz Silva, Jean Carl Ferreira, Bruna da Silva e Silva, Mariana Ribeiro Bertini, Anna Maria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Jean Carl Ferreira, Bruna da Silva e Silva, Mariana Ribeiro Bertini, Anna Maria |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Amaral, Augusto Radünz Silva, Jean Carl Ferreira, Bruna da Silva e Silva, Mariana Ribeiro Bertini, Anna Maria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gestational diabetes Infant newborn Pregnant women Pregnancy high-risk Pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology Diabetes gestacional Recém-nascido Gestantes Gestação de alto risco Resultado da gravidez. Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
topic |
Gestational diabetes Infant newborn Pregnant women Pregnancy high-risk Pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology Diabetes gestacional Recém-nascido Gestantes Gestação de alto risco Resultado da gravidez. Ginecologia e Obstetrícia |
description |
Aims: To assess neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with positive diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 522 postpartum women, among whom 255 presented with GDM, diagnosed in accordance with the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, and 267 did not have GDM. The patients in the latter group were randomly selected. Associations were established between GDM and adverse neonatal outcomes, including prematurity, macrosomia, low Apgar score, neonatal hypoglycemia, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit. Maternal characteristics such as age, pre-gestational body mass index, weight gain, parity, and mode of delivery were also analyzed for the adjustment of confounding factors. After confirming the normal distribution of the assessed characteristics, the quantitative variables were analyzed by Student’s t test and the qualitative ones by the chi-squared test. The data on the effect of GDM on perinatal outcomes were presented as relative risks using contingency tables, and robust Poisson’s regression models were used to adjust the confounding variablesResults: Newborn infants of women with GDM had a higher risk of preterm birth (relative risk [RR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.1-5.0), macrosomia (RR 1.6; 95%CI 1.1-2.5), and neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 4.2; 95%CI 1.4-12.3). The relationship between GDM and low one-minute and five-minute Apgar scores was not significant (RR 1.9; 95%CI 0.9-3.8 and RR 2.1; 95%CI 0.4-11.3, respectively). There was no significant increased risk of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (RR 1.4; 95%CI 0.6-3.2).Conclusions: The risks of prematurity, macrosomia, and neonatal hypoglycemia were higher in pregnant women with GDM diagnosed according to the IADPSG criteria. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-04-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/19272 10.15448/1980-6108.2015.1.19272 |
url |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/19272 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.15448/1980-6108.2015.1.19272 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/scientiamedica/article/view/19272/12843 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da PUCRS - ediPUCRS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2015); ID19272 Scientia Medica; v. 25 n. 1 (2015); ID19272 1980-6108 1806-5562 10.15448/1980-6108.2015.1 reponame:Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) instacron:PUC_RS |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
instacron_str |
PUC_RS |
institution |
PUC_RS |
reponame_str |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
collection |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Medica (Porto Alegre. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scientiamedica@pucrs.br || editora.periodicos@pucrs.br |
_version_ |
1809101750630612992 |