Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, João Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Maciel, Claudia Faria, Pinheiro, Juliano Lima
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: CAFI (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/43505
Resumo: The main purpose of this article is to highlight stylized facts about Private Equity funds in Brazil, in order to understand how this type of investment occurs in the Brazilian capital market. Therefore, secondary data from 12 funds that are domiciled in Brazil and invested in Brazilian companies were used. All data were obtained from a Bloomberg terminal. The results show that the most commonly used benchmark indexes by the funds of the sample was DI-Cetip, Fix TRX Des Imob I has the highest return, Brazil Invest 2014 I FIP has the highest risk of the sample, and Barao Vermelho FIP the lowest. As for the tracking error, the fund that presented the largest departure from the benchmark was Brazil Invest 2014 I FIP. In addition, negative beta was observed in several funds, which reinforces the idea that there are more appropriate measures than beta to assess risk of countries with emerging markets like Brazil. In general, the FIP TRX Des Imob I fund presented the best performance of the funds analyzed, not only for the results of the IS, IT, Jensen’s alpha and Isor indexes, but also for being one of the most adherent to the benchmark index and having one of the lowest volatilities of the sample. On the other hand, the Brazil Invest 2014 FIP fund had the lowest adherence to the benchmark, in addition to being the most volatile fund in the sample.
id PUC_SP-11_4b93d183e9034fb5fb5f5c372ab6deaf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43505
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-11
network_name_str CAFI (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in BrazilFatos estilizados dos fundos de Private Equity no BrasilThe main purpose of this article is to highlight stylized facts about Private Equity funds in Brazil, in order to understand how this type of investment occurs in the Brazilian capital market. Therefore, secondary data from 12 funds that are domiciled in Brazil and invested in Brazilian companies were used. All data were obtained from a Bloomberg terminal. The results show that the most commonly used benchmark indexes by the funds of the sample was DI-Cetip, Fix TRX Des Imob I has the highest return, Brazil Invest 2014 I FIP has the highest risk of the sample, and Barao Vermelho FIP the lowest. As for the tracking error, the fund that presented the largest departure from the benchmark was Brazil Invest 2014 I FIP. In addition, negative beta was observed in several funds, which reinforces the idea that there are more appropriate measures than beta to assess risk of countries with emerging markets like Brazil. In general, the FIP TRX Des Imob I fund presented the best performance of the funds analyzed, not only for the results of the IS, IT, Jensen’s alpha and Isor indexes, but also for being one of the most adherent to the benchmark index and having one of the lowest volatilities of the sample. On the other hand, the Brazil Invest 2014 FIP fund had the lowest adherence to the benchmark, in addition to being the most volatile fund in the sample.O objetivo deste estudo é evidenciar fatos estilizados dos fundos de Private Equity no Brasil, a fim de compreender como se dá essa modalidade de investimento no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Para tanto, utilizou-se de dados secundários de 12 fundos que possuem domicílio no Brasil e investem em empresas brasileiras. Os dados foram obtidos através do sistema de informações da Bloomberg. Os resultados mostram que o benchmark mais utilizado pelos fundos estudados foi o DI-Cetip, o Fix TRX Des Imob I possui o maior retorno, o Brasil Invest 2014 I FIP tem o maior risco da amostra, e o Barao Vermelho FIP o menor.  Quanto ao tracking error, o fundo que apresentou maior afastamento do benchmark foi o Brasil Invest 2014 I FIP. Além disso, foi observado beta negativo em diversos fundos, o que reforça a ideia de que existem medidas mais adequadas que o beta para avaliar o risco dos países com mercados emergentes. No geral, o fundo FIP TRX Des Imob I apresentou o melhor desempenho dos fundos analisados, não só pela boa performance nos índices IS, IT, Alfa de Jensen e Isor, mas também por ser um dos mais aderentes ao benchmark e possuir uma das menores volatilidades da amostra. Por outro lado, o fundo Brasil Invest 2014 FIP apresentou a menor aderência ao benchmark, além de ser o fundo mais volátil da amostra. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP2019-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/4350510.23925/cafi.v2i2.43505CAFI; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 195-210CAFI; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2019): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 195-210CAFI ; v. 2 n. 2 (2019): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 195-2102595-17502595-175010.23925/cafi.v2i2reponame:CAFI (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/43505/29107Copyright (c) 2019 CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, João EduardoMaciel, Claudia FariaPinheiro, Juliano Lima2020-07-30T17:44:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/43505Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/indexPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/oainvg@galegale.com.br||2595-17502595-1750opendoar:2020-07-30T17:44:01CAFI (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
Fatos estilizados dos fundos de Private Equity no Brasil
title Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
spellingShingle Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
Ribeiro, João Eduardo
title_short Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
title_full Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
title_fullStr Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
title_sort Stylized facts of Private Equity funds in Brazil
author Ribeiro, João Eduardo
author_facet Ribeiro, João Eduardo
Maciel, Claudia Faria
Pinheiro, Juliano Lima
author_role author
author2 Maciel, Claudia Faria
Pinheiro, Juliano Lima
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, João Eduardo
Maciel, Claudia Faria
Pinheiro, Juliano Lima
description The main purpose of this article is to highlight stylized facts about Private Equity funds in Brazil, in order to understand how this type of investment occurs in the Brazilian capital market. Therefore, secondary data from 12 funds that are domiciled in Brazil and invested in Brazilian companies were used. All data were obtained from a Bloomberg terminal. The results show that the most commonly used benchmark indexes by the funds of the sample was DI-Cetip, Fix TRX Des Imob I has the highest return, Brazil Invest 2014 I FIP has the highest risk of the sample, and Barao Vermelho FIP the lowest. As for the tracking error, the fund that presented the largest departure from the benchmark was Brazil Invest 2014 I FIP. In addition, negative beta was observed in several funds, which reinforces the idea that there are more appropriate measures than beta to assess risk of countries with emerging markets like Brazil. In general, the FIP TRX Des Imob I fund presented the best performance of the funds analyzed, not only for the results of the IS, IT, Jensen’s alpha and Isor indexes, but also for being one of the most adherent to the benchmark index and having one of the lowest volatilities of the sample. On the other hand, the Brazil Invest 2014 FIP fund had the lowest adherence to the benchmark, in addition to being the most volatile fund in the sample.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/43505
10.23925/cafi.v2i2.43505
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/43505
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/cafi.v2i2.43505
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/43505/29107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CAFI; Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 195-210
CAFI; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2019): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 195-210
CAFI ; v. 2 n. 2 (2019): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 195-210
2595-1750
2595-1750
10.23925/cafi.v2i2
reponame:CAFI (São Paulo)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str CAFI (São Paulo)
collection CAFI (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CAFI (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nvg@galegale.com.br||
_version_ 1797069023271190528