Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Kátila Oliveira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Robles Júnior, Antonio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: CAFI (São Paulo)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/36949
Resumo: This article sought to expose concepts related to defaults and provision for loan losses (PCLD), in addition to exposing consumer defaults in recent years and to explain the differences between the methodologies for calculating PCLD. Highlight for Bacen Resolution No. 2,682 and IAS (International Accounting Standards) 39, which regulates the provisioning of credit portfolios of financial institutions, respectively, using the BRGAAP and IFRS methods. A bibliographic, documentary and quantitative research was carried out, analyzing the behavior of PCLD in comparison with the methods mentioned above, of the four largest banks present in Brazil, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú and Santander. After the investigation, the relevance of the provision for credit losses was confirmed mainly in the result of financial institutions, since this provision acts as a reducing source of the credit portfolio and directly affects the result of financial institutions. Despite the differences already identified when observing the calculation of the PCLD performed by the two existing methods (BRGAAP and IFRS), there is a linearity of the data collected and presented in the results graphs. 
id PUC_SP-11_8b92b4a88aa9158c6254114e57e72231
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36949
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-11
network_name_str CAFI (São Paulo)
repository_id_str
spelling Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparisonProvisión para créditos de liquidación dudosa (PCLD) calculada de acuerdo con las normas BACEN e IFRS: comparaciónProvisão para créditos de liquidação duvidosa (PCLD) calculada conforme as normas do BACEN e IFRS: ComparaçãoThis article sought to expose concepts related to defaults and provision for loan losses (PCLD), in addition to exposing consumer defaults in recent years and to explain the differences between the methodologies for calculating PCLD. Highlight for Bacen Resolution No. 2,682 and IAS (International Accounting Standards) 39, which regulates the provisioning of credit portfolios of financial institutions, respectively, using the BRGAAP and IFRS methods. A bibliographic, documentary and quantitative research was carried out, analyzing the behavior of PCLD in comparison with the methods mentioned above, of the four largest banks present in Brazil, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú and Santander. After the investigation, the relevance of the provision for credit losses was confirmed mainly in the result of financial institutions, since this provision acts as a reducing source of the credit portfolio and directly affects the result of financial institutions. Despite the differences already identified when observing the calculation of the PCLD performed by the two existing methods (BRGAAP and IFRS), there is a linearity of the data collected and presented in the results graphs. Este artículo buscó exponer conceptos relacionados con la morosidad y la provisión de pérdida de préstamos (PCLD), además de exponer el incumplimiento del consumidor en los últimos años y explicar las diferencias entre las metodologías de cálculo de PCLD. Destacando la Resolución Bacen No. 2,682 y las NIC (Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad) 39, que regulan la provisión de carteras de crédito de instituciones financieras, respectivamente, utilizando los métodos BRGAAP e IFRS. Se realizó una investigación bibliográfica, documental y cuantitativa analizando el comportamiento de PCLD en comparación con los métodos antes mencionados, de los cuatro bancos más grandes presentes en Brasil, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú y Santander. Después de la investigación realizada, la relevancia de la reserva para pérdidas crediticias se confirmó principalmente en el resultado de las instituciones financieras, ya que esta disposición actúa como una fuente reductora de la cartera de crédito e impacta directamente el resultado de las instituciones financieras. A pesar de las diferencias ya identificadas al observar el cálculo de PCLD realizado por los dos métodos existentes (BRGAAP e IFRS), existe una linealidad de los datos recopilados y presentados en los gráficos de resultados.Palabras clave: Contabilidad de instituciones financieras. Reserva para pérdidas crediticias.Este artigo buscou expor conceitos relacionados a inadimplência e Provisão para Crédito de Liquidação Duvidosa (PCLD), além de expor a inadimplência do consumidor nos últimos anos e explanar as diferenças existentes entre as metodologias de cálculo da PCLD. Destacando a Resolução nº 2.682 do Bacen e o IAS (International Accounting Standards) 39, que regulamentam o provisionamento das carteiras de crédito das instituições financeiras, respectivamente pelos métodos BRGAAP e IFRS. Realizou-se pesquisa bibliográfica, documental e quantitativa analisando o comportamento da PCLD quando comparada pelos métodos já citados, dos quatro maiores bancos presentes no Brasil, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú e Santander. Após as pesquisas realizadas, confirmou-se a relevância da PCLD principalmente no resultado das instituições financeiras devido esta provisão atuar como fonte redutora da carteira de crédito e impactar diretamente o resultado das instituições financeiras. Apesar de serem identificadas diferenças já esperadas quando observado o cálculo da PCLD realizado pelos dois métodos existentes (BRGAAP e IFRS), existe linearidade dos dados coletados e expostos nos gráficos de resultado.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP2018-01-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/3694910.23925/cafi.v1i1.36949CAFI; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 4 - 21CAFI; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2018): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 4 - 21CAFI ; v. 1 n. 1 (2018): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 4 - 212595-17502595-175010.23925/cafi.v1i1reponame:CAFI (São Paulo)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/36949/25173Copyright (c) 2018 CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informaçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Kátila OliveiraRobles Júnior, Antonio2020-07-30T23:42:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/36949Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/indexPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/oainvg@galegale.com.br||2595-17502595-1750opendoar:2020-07-30T23:42:10CAFI (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
Provisión para créditos de liquidación dudosa (PCLD) calculada de acuerdo con las normas BACEN e IFRS: comparación
Provisão para créditos de liquidação duvidosa (PCLD) calculada conforme as normas do BACEN e IFRS: Comparação
title Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
spellingShingle Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
Silva, Kátila Oliveira
title_short Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
title_full Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
title_fullStr Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
title_full_unstemmed Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
title_sort Provision for due Liquidation Credits (PCLD) calculated in accordance with bacen and IFRS standards: comparison
author Silva, Kátila Oliveira
author_facet Silva, Kátila Oliveira
Robles Júnior, Antonio
author_role author
author2 Robles Júnior, Antonio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Kátila Oliveira
Robles Júnior, Antonio
description This article sought to expose concepts related to defaults and provision for loan losses (PCLD), in addition to exposing consumer defaults in recent years and to explain the differences between the methodologies for calculating PCLD. Highlight for Bacen Resolution No. 2,682 and IAS (International Accounting Standards) 39, which regulates the provisioning of credit portfolios of financial institutions, respectively, using the BRGAAP and IFRS methods. A bibliographic, documentary and quantitative research was carried out, analyzing the behavior of PCLD in comparison with the methods mentioned above, of the four largest banks present in Brazil, Banco do Brasil, Bradesco, Itaú and Santander. After the investigation, the relevance of the provision for credit losses was confirmed mainly in the result of financial institutions, since this provision acts as a reducing source of the credit portfolio and directly affects the result of financial institutions. Despite the differences already identified when observing the calculation of the PCLD performed by the two existing methods (BRGAAP and IFRS), there is a linearity of the data collected and presented in the results graphs. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/36949
10.23925/cafi.v1i1.36949
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/36949
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/cafi.v1i1.36949
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/CAFI/article/view/36949/25173
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC/SP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv CAFI; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 4 - 21
CAFI; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2018): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 4 - 21
CAFI ; v. 1 n. 1 (2018): CAFI - Contabilidade, Atuária, Finanças & Informação; 4 - 21
2595-1750
2595-1750
10.23925/cafi.v1i1
reponame:CAFI (São Paulo)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str CAFI (São Paulo)
collection CAFI (São Paulo)
repository.name.fl_str_mv CAFI (São Paulo) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv nvg@galegale.com.br||
_version_ 1797069023177867264