FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Tais Macedo de Brito
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/50524
Resumo: The presente article aims to study freedom of expression in the context of the electoral period, having the judgment of ADI 4451 as reference, which led the theme to the evaluation of the Supreme Court. The research is documentary and adopts a deductive approach, identifying the premises set out in the STF judgment to indicate the guidelines for the next elections. The judge recognizes that restrictions can be allowed to guarantee the integrity of the electoral process. The prohibition of political advertisement is an example. However, the decision consistently follows the jurisprudence of the constitutional court, recognizing that restrictions on freedom of expression are exceptional. In this sense, it recognized the disproportionality of the restrictions imposed in art. 45, paragraphs II and III (second part), of the Law on Elections (Law 9.504/1997). Although in the event of obiter dictum, fake news phenomenon is mentioned in the trial, which recognizes the freedom of the press as an essential instrument for combating this pernicious phenomenon to the democratic regime. The approach is original because it includes current debates on the topic of fakes news in the analysis of the trial, wich importance is highlighted with the proximity of municipal elections.
id PUC_SP-12_b88b82c46e4deef7a9173b73152fb984
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50524
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-12
network_name_str Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
repository_id_str
spelling FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO EM PERÍODO ELEITORAL: RESTRIÇÕES SÃO ADMITIDAS PELA CONSTITUIÇÃO FEDERAL?Freedom of speechElectionsFreedom of the pressPolitical AdvertisingFake NewsLiberdade de expressãoEleiçõesLiberdade de ImprensaPropaganda PolíticaFake NewsThe presente article aims to study freedom of expression in the context of the electoral period, having the judgment of ADI 4451 as reference, which led the theme to the evaluation of the Supreme Court. The research is documentary and adopts a deductive approach, identifying the premises set out in the STF judgment to indicate the guidelines for the next elections. The judge recognizes that restrictions can be allowed to guarantee the integrity of the electoral process. The prohibition of political advertisement is an example. However, the decision consistently follows the jurisprudence of the constitutional court, recognizing that restrictions on freedom of expression are exceptional. In this sense, it recognized the disproportionality of the restrictions imposed in art. 45, paragraphs II and III (second part), of the Law on Elections (Law 9.504/1997). Although in the event of obiter dictum, fake news phenomenon is mentioned in the trial, which recognizes the freedom of the press as an essential instrument for combating this pernicious phenomenon to the democratic regime. The approach is original because it includes current debates on the topic of fakes news in the analysis of the trial, wich importance is highlighted with the proximity of municipal elections.O presente trabalho tem por objetivo analisar a liberdade de expressão no contexto do período eleitoral, tendo como referencial o julgamento da ADI 4451, que levou o tema à apreciação do Supremo Tribunal Federal. A pesquisa é documental e adota abordagem dedutiva, identificando as premissas fixadas no julgado do STF para indicar as orientações para as próximas eleições. Sem deixar de reconhecer a possibilidade de restrições necessárias à higidez do processo eleitoral, a exemplo da vedação da propaganda política, o julgado segue de forma coerente a jurisprudência da corte constitucional, reconhecendo que restrições à liberdade de expressão são excepcionais. Nesta linha, reconhece a desproporcionalidade das restrições impostas no art. 45, incisos II e III (segunda parte),   da Lei das Eleições ( Lei 9.504/1997).  Ainda que em sede de obiter dictum, o fenômeno das fakes news é tangenciado no julgamento, que reconhece a liberdade de imprensa como instrumento importante para o combate deste fenômeno pernicioso ao regime democrático. A abordagem é original na medida em que insere na análise do julgamento debates atuais sobre o tema das fakes News, ganhando destaque a importância do enfrentamento do tema diante da proximidade das eleições municipais.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/5052410.23925/ddem.v0i1.50524Democratic Rights & Modern State; No. 1 (2020): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 37-51Derechos democráticos & estado moderno; Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 37-51Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; n. 1 (2020): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 37-512675-764810.23925/ddem.v0i1reponame:Direitos Democráticos & Estado Modernoinstname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/50524/33506Copyright (c) 2020 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Modernoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCunha, Tais Macedo de Brito2023-01-17T19:15:11Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50524Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEMPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/oairevistadodireitopucsp@gmail.com2675-76482675-7648opendoar:2023-01-17T19:15:11Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO EM PERÍODO ELEITORAL: RESTRIÇÕES SÃO ADMITIDAS PELA CONSTITUIÇÃO FEDERAL?
title FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
spellingShingle FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
Cunha, Tais Macedo de Brito
Freedom of speech
Elections
Freedom of the press
Political Advertising
Fake News
Liberdade de expressão
Eleições
Liberdade de Imprensa
Propaganda Política
Fake News
title_short FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
title_full FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
title_fullStr FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
title_full_unstemmed FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
title_sort FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN THE ELECTORAL PERIOD: ARE RESTRICTIONS ALLOWED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?
author Cunha, Tais Macedo de Brito
author_facet Cunha, Tais Macedo de Brito
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Tais Macedo de Brito
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Freedom of speech
Elections
Freedom of the press
Political Advertising
Fake News
Liberdade de expressão
Eleições
Liberdade de Imprensa
Propaganda Política
Fake News
topic Freedom of speech
Elections
Freedom of the press
Political Advertising
Fake News
Liberdade de expressão
Eleições
Liberdade de Imprensa
Propaganda Política
Fake News
description The presente article aims to study freedom of expression in the context of the electoral period, having the judgment of ADI 4451 as reference, which led the theme to the evaluation of the Supreme Court. The research is documentary and adopts a deductive approach, identifying the premises set out in the STF judgment to indicate the guidelines for the next elections. The judge recognizes that restrictions can be allowed to guarantee the integrity of the electoral process. The prohibition of political advertisement is an example. However, the decision consistently follows the jurisprudence of the constitutional court, recognizing that restrictions on freedom of expression are exceptional. In this sense, it recognized the disproportionality of the restrictions imposed in art. 45, paragraphs II and III (second part), of the Law on Elections (Law 9.504/1997). Although in the event of obiter dictum, fake news phenomenon is mentioned in the trial, which recognizes the freedom of the press as an essential instrument for combating this pernicious phenomenon to the democratic regime. The approach is original because it includes current debates on the topic of fakes news in the analysis of the trial, wich importance is highlighted with the proximity of municipal elections.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/50524
10.23925/ddem.v0i1.50524
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/50524
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/ddem.v0i1.50524
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/DDEM/article/view/50524/33506
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Democratic Rights & Modern State; No. 1 (2020): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 37-51
Derechos democráticos & estado moderno; Núm. 1 (2020): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 37-51
Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; n. 1 (2020): Revista Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno; 37-51
2675-7648
10.23925/ddem.v0i1
reponame:Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
collection Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno
repository.name.fl_str_mv Direitos Democráticos & Estado Moderno - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadodireitopucsp@gmail.com
_version_ 1796798344110014464