Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Rever (São Paulo. Online)
DOI: 10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i2a8
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/34130
Resumo: The commentary on the epistle to the Romans by Origen, completely involved with Paul's theology, is the result of the controversies that surrounded him, and it is at the same time an attempt to systematize Paul's writings, since it was believed that Pauline texts contained gaps that needed to be filled and interpreted, in order to make them clearer and more intelligible for any reader. Controversial topics such as the comparison between natural law and mosaic law; literal or spiritual and mystical exegesis; free will and God's omniscience; the pre-existence of the soul, which contributed to Origin's later reputation as a heretic author, highlighted the great moment of the Alexandrine, already in his maturity. 
id PUC_SP-13_9b856a5eb6111615ee4715768242c840
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34130
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-13
network_name_str Rever (São Paulo. Online)
spelling Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the RomansComentário de Orígenes à Espístola aos RomanosOrígenesPauloRufinolei naturallei mosaicaexegesealegoriaOrigenPaulRufinusnatural lawmosaic lawexegesisallegoryThe commentary on the epistle to the Romans by Origen, completely involved with Paul's theology, is the result of the controversies that surrounded him, and it is at the same time an attempt to systematize Paul's writings, since it was believed that Pauline texts contained gaps that needed to be filled and interpreted, in order to make them clearer and more intelligible for any reader. Controversial topics such as the comparison between natural law and mosaic law; literal or spiritual and mystical exegesis; free will and God's omniscience; the pre-existence of the soul, which contributed to Origin's later reputation as a heretic author, highlighted the great moment of the Alexandrine, already in his maturity. O comentário à Epístola aos Romanos que Orígenes irá fazer completamente envolvido com a teologia de Paulo será o resultado do ambiente de controvérsias que o circundava, e ao mesmo tempo, uma tentativa de sistematizar os escritos de Paulo, pois se acreditava que as passagens paulinas continham algumas lacunas que seria necessário completar e interpretar para torná-las mais claras e acessíveis para qualquer leitor. Temas controversos, tais como a comparação entre a lei natural e a lei mosaica; a exegese literal ou espiritual e mística; o livre-arbítrio e a onisciência de Deus, a preexistência das almas, a qual contribuiu para a pecha que Orígenes ganhou posteriormente, de ser um autor herético, assinalavam o grande momento do alexandrino já em sua fase mais madura.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2017-08-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/3413010.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i2a8REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2017): Psicologia da Religião: Demandas e Aplicação; 141-161REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 17 n. 2 (2017): Psicologia da Religião: Demandas e Aplicação; 141-1611677-1222reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/34130/23462Copyright (c) 2017 REVER - Revista de Estudos da Religiãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNascimento, Sidnei Francisco do2017-12-24T12:53:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/34130Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/PRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/rever/oairever@pucsp.br1677-12221677-1222opendoar:2017-12-24T12:53:10Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
Comentário de Orígenes à Espístola aos Romanos
title Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
spellingShingle Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
Orígenes
Paulo
Rufino
lei natural
lei mosaica
exegese
alegoria
Origen
Paul
Rufinus
natural law
mosaic law
exegesis
allegory
Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
Orígenes
Paulo
Rufino
lei natural
lei mosaica
exegese
alegoria
Origen
Paul
Rufinus
natural law
mosaic law
exegesis
allegory
title_short Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
title_full Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
title_fullStr Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
title_full_unstemmed Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
title_sort Origen’s commentary on the Epistle to the Romans
author Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
author_facet Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nascimento, Sidnei Francisco do
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Orígenes
Paulo
Rufino
lei natural
lei mosaica
exegese
alegoria
Origen
Paul
Rufinus
natural law
mosaic law
exegesis
allegory
topic Orígenes
Paulo
Rufino
lei natural
lei mosaica
exegese
alegoria
Origen
Paul
Rufinus
natural law
mosaic law
exegesis
allegory
description The commentary on the epistle to the Romans by Origen, completely involved with Paul's theology, is the result of the controversies that surrounded him, and it is at the same time an attempt to systematize Paul's writings, since it was believed that Pauline texts contained gaps that needed to be filled and interpreted, in order to make them clearer and more intelligible for any reader. Controversial topics such as the comparison between natural law and mosaic law; literal or spiritual and mystical exegesis; free will and God's omniscience; the pre-existence of the soul, which contributed to Origin's later reputation as a heretic author, highlighted the great moment of the Alexandrine, already in his maturity. 
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-24
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/34130
10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i2a8
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/34130
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i2a8
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/34130/23462
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 REVER - Revista de Estudos da Religião
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 REVER - Revista de Estudos da Religião
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2017): Psicologia da Religião: Demandas e Aplicação; 141-161
REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 17 n. 2 (2017): Psicologia da Religião: Demandas e Aplicação; 141-161
1677-1222
reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Rever (São Paulo. Online)
collection Rever (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rever@pucsp.br
_version_ 1822182099123175424
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.23925/1677-1222.2017vol17i2a8

Registros relacionados