Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Matheus Oliva da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Rever (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/59488
Resumo: This is a discussion in philosophy of the study of religion – that is, of philosophy of science focused on the problems and themes of the discipline “study of religion” (“SR”). My objective is to defend that applied SR can only be carried out (1) if it is based on basic research in SR, both empirical and theoretical, and (2) if it is practiced professionally by those who are institutionally trained in SR. Our method is persuasive, argumentative writing, which defends a thesis about a given problem, seeking to argue to readers about the advantages of my position and the errors of divergent positions. The conduct of this argument goes through the search to answer the main research problem: how is it possible to carry out a practical application of SR effectively? The article is structured in three parts that seek a line of reasoning that responds to the problem. First, I argue for the necessary relationship between basic SR and applied SR. Second, I argue that those who are institutionally trained in this area apply the SR. Third, I present a method that uses a primary criterion to make applied SR that is a logical consequence of the first two parts. I conclude that the multidisciplinary term “applied religious studies” is incoherent, and applied SR only makes sense as an autonomous “applied study of religions.” As well as that, training in SR needs to provide, from the curriculum, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the scholar of religions to know how to apply professionally your area of training.
id PUC_SP-13_e19a267a69d23208deaac8383843ff8f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/59488
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-13
network_name_str Rever (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religionCondições e método básico para a prática da ciência da religião aplicadaphilosophy of scienceprofessionbasic researchapplied sciencefilosofia da ciênciaprofissãopesquisa básicaciência aplicadaThis is a discussion in philosophy of the study of religion – that is, of philosophy of science focused on the problems and themes of the discipline “study of religion” (“SR”). My objective is to defend that applied SR can only be carried out (1) if it is based on basic research in SR, both empirical and theoretical, and (2) if it is practiced professionally by those who are institutionally trained in SR. Our method is persuasive, argumentative writing, which defends a thesis about a given problem, seeking to argue to readers about the advantages of my position and the errors of divergent positions. The conduct of this argument goes through the search to answer the main research problem: how is it possible to carry out a practical application of SR effectively? The article is structured in three parts that seek a line of reasoning that responds to the problem. First, I argue for the necessary relationship between basic SR and applied SR. Second, I argue that those who are institutionally trained in this area apply the SR. Third, I present a method that uses a primary criterion to make applied SR that is a logical consequence of the first two parts. I conclude that the multidisciplinary term “applied religious studies” is incoherent, and applied SR only makes sense as an autonomous “applied study of religions.” As well as that, training in SR needs to provide, from the curriculum, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the scholar of religions to know how to apply professionally your area of training.Esta é uma discussão em filosofia da ciência da religião – ou seja, de filosofia da ciência focada nos problemas e temas da disciplina “ciência da religião” (“CR”). Meu objetivo é defender que a CR, em seu ramo aplicado e voltado à atuação profissional, somente pode ser realizada se (1) for baseada nas pesquisas básicas em CR, tanto empíricas como teóricas; e se (2) for praticada profissionalmente por quem é formado institucionalmente em CR. Nosso método é a escrita argumentativa persuasiva, que defende uma tese sobre um determinado problema buscando convencer os leitores acerca das vantagens daquela posição e os erros das posições divergentes. A condução dessa argumentação passa pela busca por responder o problema principal da pesquisa: de que forma é possível a realização efetiva de uma aplicação prática da CR? O artigo está estruturado em três partes que buscam uma linha de raciocínio que responda ao problema: primeiro, a necessária relação entre CR básica e CR aplicada; segundo, a necessidade de a CR ser aplicada por quem é institucionalmente formado nessa área; e, por fim, apresento um método que se utiliza de um critério básico para fazer CR aplicada que é consequência lógica das duas primeiras partes. Concluo que o termo “ciências da religião aplicada” é incoerente, e a CR aplicada só faz sentido como uma ciência da religião aplicada, bem como que a formação em CR precisa possibilitar desde o currículo as condições necessárias e suficientes para o cientista das religiões saber como aplicar profissionalmente sua área de formação.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2022-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/5948810.23925/1677-1222.2021vol22i2a2REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022): Applied study of religion; 13-29REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): Ciência da religião aplicada; 13-291677-1222reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/59488/41101Copyright (c) 2022 REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religiãohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Matheus Oliva da2022-12-02T23:41:32Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/59488Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/PRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/rever/oairever@pucsp.br1677-12221677-1222opendoar:2022-12-02T23:41:32Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
Condições e método básico para a prática da ciência da religião aplicada
title Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
spellingShingle Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
Costa, Matheus Oliva da
philosophy of science
profession
basic research
applied science
filosofia da ciência
profissão
pesquisa básica
ciência aplicada
title_short Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
title_full Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
title_fullStr Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
title_full_unstemmed Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
title_sort Conditions and basic method for the practice of applied study of religion
author Costa, Matheus Oliva da
author_facet Costa, Matheus Oliva da
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Matheus Oliva da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv philosophy of science
profession
basic research
applied science
filosofia da ciência
profissão
pesquisa básica
ciência aplicada
topic philosophy of science
profession
basic research
applied science
filosofia da ciência
profissão
pesquisa básica
ciência aplicada
description This is a discussion in philosophy of the study of religion – that is, of philosophy of science focused on the problems and themes of the discipline “study of religion” (“SR”). My objective is to defend that applied SR can only be carried out (1) if it is based on basic research in SR, both empirical and theoretical, and (2) if it is practiced professionally by those who are institutionally trained in SR. Our method is persuasive, argumentative writing, which defends a thesis about a given problem, seeking to argue to readers about the advantages of my position and the errors of divergent positions. The conduct of this argument goes through the search to answer the main research problem: how is it possible to carry out a practical application of SR effectively? The article is structured in three parts that seek a line of reasoning that responds to the problem. First, I argue for the necessary relationship between basic SR and applied SR. Second, I argue that those who are institutionally trained in this area apply the SR. Third, I present a method that uses a primary criterion to make applied SR that is a logical consequence of the first two parts. I conclude that the multidisciplinary term “applied religious studies” is incoherent, and applied SR only makes sense as an autonomous “applied study of religions.” As well as that, training in SR needs to provide, from the curriculum, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the scholar of religions to know how to apply professionally your area of training.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-02
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/59488
10.23925/1677-1222.2021vol22i2a2
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/59488
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/1677-1222.2021vol22i2a2
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/rever/article/view/59488/41101
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVER: Journal for the Study of Religion; Vol. 22 No. 2 (2022): Applied study of religion; 13-29
REVER: Revista de Estudos da Religião; v. 22 n. 2 (2022): Ciência da religião aplicada; 13-29
1677-1222
reponame:Rever (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Rever (São Paulo. Online)
collection Rever (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Rever (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rever@pucsp.br
_version_ 1796798388635697152