Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107 |
Resumo: | This article analyzes how, from Wittgenstein’s position in relation to ethics, it is not possible to derive a non-cognitivist posture as intended, for example, by Simon Blackburn’s quasi-realism. Firstly the consequences of the interpretation in relation to the existence of moral propositions are rebuilt; then we argue that there is a misconception in how the dichotomy between facts and values is understood. Lastly we point out that on the one hand the Viennese philosopher refuses a Platonic perspective on the rules, and on the other hand the thesis that there are no objective rules. The rules consist of an intersubjective expression shared by the form of life, a diametrically opposite argument to the quasi-realist non-cognitivism of Blackburn. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_21a8a2f6096d91a0ebb74f5156495648 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40107 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in WittgensteinRealidade, linguagem e não-cognitivismo em WittgensteinBlackburnMetaéticaNão-cognitivismoQuase-realismoWittgenstein.BlackburnMetaethicsNon-cognitivismQuasi-realismWittgenstein.This article analyzes how, from Wittgenstein’s position in relation to ethics, it is not possible to derive a non-cognitivist posture as intended, for example, by Simon Blackburn’s quasi-realism. Firstly the consequences of the interpretation in relation to the existence of moral propositions are rebuilt; then we argue that there is a misconception in how the dichotomy between facts and values is understood. Lastly we point out that on the one hand the Viennese philosopher refuses a Platonic perspective on the rules, and on the other hand the thesis that there are no objective rules. The rules consist of an intersubjective expression shared by the form of life, a diametrically opposite argument to the quasi-realist non-cognitivism of Blackburn.Este artigo analisa de que modo, a partir da posição de Wittgenstein em relação à ética, não é possível derivar uma postura não-cognitivista como pretende, por exemplo, o quase-realismo de Simon Blackburn. Primeiramente, reconstruímos as consequências da interpretação a respeito da existência de proposições morais para, posteriormente, sustentar que há um equívoco no modo de compreender a dicotomia entre fatos e valores. E, por último, mostramos que o filósofo vienense recusa, por um lado, uma visão platônica sobre as regras e, por outro, a tese de que não há regras objetivas. As regras são expressão intersubjetiva compartilhada pela forma de vida, argumento diametralmente oposto ao não-cognitivismo quase-realista de Blackburn.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2019-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4010710.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i1p123-136Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019); 123-136Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2019); 123-1362316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107/29403Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeruzzo Júnior, Léo2019-09-11T00:35:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40107Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2019-09-11T00:35:01Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein Realidade, linguagem e não-cognitivismo em Wittgenstein |
title |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein |
spellingShingle |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein Peruzzo Júnior, Léo Blackburn Metaética Não-cognitivismo Quase-realismo Wittgenstein. Blackburn Metaethics Non-cognitivism Quasi-realism Wittgenstein. |
title_short |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein |
title_full |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein |
title_fullStr |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein |
title_sort |
Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein |
author |
Peruzzo Júnior, Léo |
author_facet |
Peruzzo Júnior, Léo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peruzzo Júnior, Léo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Blackburn Metaética Não-cognitivismo Quase-realismo Wittgenstein. Blackburn Metaethics Non-cognitivism Quasi-realism Wittgenstein. |
topic |
Blackburn Metaética Não-cognitivismo Quase-realismo Wittgenstein. Blackburn Metaethics Non-cognitivism Quasi-realism Wittgenstein. |
description |
This article analyzes how, from Wittgenstein’s position in relation to ethics, it is not possible to derive a non-cognitivist posture as intended, for example, by Simon Blackburn’s quasi-realism. Firstly the consequences of the interpretation in relation to the existence of moral propositions are rebuilt; then we argue that there is a misconception in how the dichotomy between facts and values is understood. Lastly we point out that on the one hand the Viennese philosopher refuses a Platonic perspective on the rules, and on the other hand the thesis that there are no objective rules. The rules consist of an intersubjective expression shared by the form of life, a diametrically opposite argument to the quasi-realist non-cognitivism of Blackburn. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107 10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i1p123-136 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i1p123-136 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107/29403 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019); 123-136 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2019); 123-136 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387421839065088 |