Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Peruzzo Júnior, Léo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107
Resumo: This article analyzes how, from Wittgenstein’s position in relation to ethics, it is not possible to derive a non-cognitivist posture as intended, for example, by Simon Blackburn’s quasi-realism. Firstly the consequences of the interpretation in relation to the existence of moral propositions are rebuilt; then we argue that there is a misconception in how the dichotomy between facts and values is understood. Lastly we point out that on the one hand the Viennese philosopher refuses a Platonic perspective on the rules, and on the other hand the thesis that there are no objective rules. The rules consist of an intersubjective expression shared by the form of life, a diametrically opposite argument to the quasi-realist non-cognitivism of Blackburn.
id PUC_SP-15_21a8a2f6096d91a0ebb74f5156495648
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40107
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Reality, language and non-cognitivism in WittgensteinRealidade, linguagem e não-cognitivismo em WittgensteinBlackburnMetaéticaNão-cognitivismoQuase-realismoWittgenstein.BlackburnMetaethicsNon-cognitivismQuasi-realismWittgenstein.This article analyzes how, from Wittgenstein’s position in relation to ethics, it is not possible to derive a non-cognitivist posture as intended, for example, by Simon Blackburn’s quasi-realism. Firstly the consequences of the interpretation in relation to the existence of moral propositions are rebuilt; then we argue that there is a misconception in how the dichotomy between facts and values is understood. Lastly we point out that on the one hand the Viennese philosopher refuses a Platonic perspective on the rules, and on the other hand the thesis that there are no objective rules. The rules consist of an intersubjective expression shared by the form of life, a diametrically opposite argument to the quasi-realist non-cognitivism of Blackburn.Este artigo analisa de que modo, a partir da posição de Wittgenstein em relação à ética, não é possível derivar uma postura não-cognitivista como pretende, por exemplo, o quase-realismo de Simon Blackburn. Primeiramente, reconstruímos as consequências da interpretação a respeito da existência de proposições morais para, posteriormente, sustentar que há um equívoco no modo de compreender a dicotomia entre fatos e valores. E, por último, mostramos que o filósofo vienense recusa, por um lado, uma visão platônica sobre as regras e, por outro, a tese de que não há regras objetivas. As regras são expressão intersubjetiva compartilhada pela forma de vida, argumento diametralmente oposto ao não-cognitivismo quase-realista de Blackburn.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2019-09-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4010710.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i1p123-136Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019); 123-136Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2019); 123-1362316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPporhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107/29403Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeruzzo Júnior, Léo2019-09-11T00:35:01Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40107Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2019-09-11T00:35:01Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
Realidade, linguagem e não-cognitivismo em Wittgenstein
title Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
spellingShingle Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
Peruzzo Júnior, Léo
Blackburn
Metaética
Não-cognitivismo
Quase-realismo
Wittgenstein.
Blackburn
Metaethics
Non-cognitivism
Quasi-realism
Wittgenstein.
title_short Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
title_full Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
title_fullStr Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
title_full_unstemmed Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
title_sort Reality, language and non-cognitivism in Wittgenstein
author Peruzzo Júnior, Léo
author_facet Peruzzo Júnior, Léo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Peruzzo Júnior, Léo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blackburn
Metaética
Não-cognitivismo
Quase-realismo
Wittgenstein.
Blackburn
Metaethics
Non-cognitivism
Quasi-realism
Wittgenstein.
topic Blackburn
Metaética
Não-cognitivismo
Quase-realismo
Wittgenstein.
Blackburn
Metaethics
Non-cognitivism
Quasi-realism
Wittgenstein.
description This article analyzes how, from Wittgenstein’s position in relation to ethics, it is not possible to derive a non-cognitivist posture as intended, for example, by Simon Blackburn’s quasi-realism. Firstly the consequences of the interpretation in relation to the existence of moral propositions are rebuilt; then we argue that there is a misconception in how the dichotomy between facts and values is understood. Lastly we point out that on the one hand the Viennese philosopher refuses a Platonic perspective on the rules, and on the other hand the thesis that there are no objective rules. The rules consist of an intersubjective expression shared by the form of life, a diametrically opposite argument to the quasi-realist non-cognitivism of Blackburn.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107
10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i1p123-136
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2019v20i1p123-136
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40107/29403
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2019); 123-136
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 20 n. 1 (2019); 123-136
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387421839065088