All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40877 |
Resumo: | In James’ work, there is an explicit reaction against Renan’s insincerity and vanity as the dominant moral tone. The way in which James judges Renan in particular, and the Latin spirit in general, is related to an early identification with the German spirit through his Protestant background. Within this framework, we will see that through Carlyle’s figure, James opposes the objective moral of work to Renan’s interior gnostic sensitivity. Since there exists an overt link between Carlyle and Calvinism, the component of Protestant ethics in James’ proposal becomes manifest. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to show that strenuous mood, as a characteristic of courage and manhood, has a Protestant tone. |
id |
PUC_SP-15_35a825d4a04648b68036ade5c3433625 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40877 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest RenanNem tudo é vaidade: William James versus Ernest RenanCarlyleÉticaHumor extenuanteProtestantismoRenanCarlyleEthicsProtestantismRenanStrenuous moodIn James’ work, there is an explicit reaction against Renan’s insincerity and vanity as the dominant moral tone. The way in which James judges Renan in particular, and the Latin spirit in general, is related to an early identification with the German spirit through his Protestant background. Within this framework, we will see that through Carlyle’s figure, James opposes the objective moral of work to Renan’s interior gnostic sensitivity. Since there exists an overt link between Carlyle and Calvinism, the component of Protestant ethics in James’ proposal becomes manifest. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to show that strenuous mood, as a characteristic of courage and manhood, has a Protestant tone.Na obra de James, há uma reação explícita contra a falsidade e a vaidade como o tom moral dominante. O modo como James julga Renan em particular, e o espírito latino em geral, está relacionado a uma identificação inicial com o espírito germânico através de um contexto protestante. Dentro dessa estrutura, nós veremos que por meio da figura de Carlyle, James opõe-se à moral objetiva da obra para com a sensibilidade gnóstica interior de Renan. Visto que há uma conexão óbvia entre Carlyle e o Calvinismo, o componente da ética protestante na proposta de James torna-se manifesta. Consequentemente, o propósito deste artigo é mostrar que o humor extenuante, como uma característica de coragem e virilidade, possui um tom protestante.Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2019-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4087710.23925/2316-5278.2018v19i2p242-257Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018); 242-257Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 19 n. 2 (2018); 242-2572316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40877/27839Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessJatuff, José2019-02-01T16:39:18Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/40877Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2019-02-01T16:39:18Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan Nem tudo é vaidade: William James versus Ernest Renan |
title |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan |
spellingShingle |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan Jatuff, José Carlyle Ética Humor extenuante Protestantismo Renan Carlyle Ethics Protestantism Renan Strenuous mood |
title_short |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan |
title_full |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan |
title_fullStr |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan |
title_full_unstemmed |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan |
title_sort |
All is not Vanity: William James versus Ernest Renan |
author |
Jatuff, José |
author_facet |
Jatuff, José |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Jatuff, José |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carlyle Ética Humor extenuante Protestantismo Renan Carlyle Ethics Protestantism Renan Strenuous mood |
topic |
Carlyle Ética Humor extenuante Protestantismo Renan Carlyle Ethics Protestantism Renan Strenuous mood |
description |
In James’ work, there is an explicit reaction against Renan’s insincerity and vanity as the dominant moral tone. The way in which James judges Renan in particular, and the Latin spirit in general, is related to an early identification with the German spirit through his Protestant background. Within this framework, we will see that through Carlyle’s figure, James opposes the objective moral of work to Renan’s interior gnostic sensitivity. Since there exists an overt link between Carlyle and Calvinism, the component of Protestant ethics in James’ proposal becomes manifest. Consequently, the purpose of this paper is to show that strenuous mood, as a characteristic of courage and manhood, has a Protestant tone. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40877 10.23925/2316-5278.2018v19i2p242-257 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40877 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2018v19i2p242-257 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/40877/27839 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2018); 242-257 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 19 n. 2 (2018); 242-257 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422124277760 |