James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833 |
Resumo: | This article supports a reading of the “Stream of Thought” chapter in The Principles of Psychology according to which James was not formulating an idea of linguistic meanings as private feelings occurring within the speaker’s mind, but rather criticizing the habit of basically considering language an association of names, because of the misleading consequence of this assumption for our understanding of thought as primarily resulting from the sum of its discrete parts. James was suggesting the possibility of adopting a different approach to language by considering its continuous, relational or transitive aspects, instead of focusing exclusively on substantive elements. He seems to be inviting his readers to adopt an attitude towards language complementing his own holistic view of thought as continuous and involving relations. The author explores the claim that James was considering two different attitudes towards language (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): a more critical approach and a disposition that is attentive to the dynamic, contextual and embodied shaping of the meaning of words. This reading is based on and further develops the idea that The Principles had a positive influence on Wittgenstein, rather than a merely critical one—an interpretation supported by a group of recent scholars (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; and SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016). |
id |
PUC_SP-15_36fd026aeeea4652c87aaa27c86e9633 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47833 |
network_acronym_str |
PUC_SP-15 |
network_name_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on WittgensteinJames sobre o fluxo da linguagem: com alguns comentários sobre sua influência em WittgensteinAtomismo linguísticoHolismo linguísticoLudwig WittgensteinTeoria dinâmica do significadoWilliam James.Dynamic theory of meaningLinguistic atomismLinguistic holismLudwig WittgensteinWilliam James.This article supports a reading of the “Stream of Thought” chapter in The Principles of Psychology according to which James was not formulating an idea of linguistic meanings as private feelings occurring within the speaker’s mind, but rather criticizing the habit of basically considering language an association of names, because of the misleading consequence of this assumption for our understanding of thought as primarily resulting from the sum of its discrete parts. James was suggesting the possibility of adopting a different approach to language by considering its continuous, relational or transitive aspects, instead of focusing exclusively on substantive elements. He seems to be inviting his readers to adopt an attitude towards language complementing his own holistic view of thought as continuous and involving relations. The author explores the claim that James was considering two different attitudes towards language (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): a more critical approach and a disposition that is attentive to the dynamic, contextual and embodied shaping of the meaning of words. This reading is based on and further develops the idea that The Principles had a positive influence on Wittgenstein, rather than a merely critical one—an interpretation supported by a group of recent scholars (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; and SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016).Este artigo sustenta uma leitura do capítulo “Stream of Thought” em The Principles of Psichology segundo o qual William James não formulou uma ideia de significados linguísticos como sentimentos privados que ocorrem dentro da mente do falante, ao contrário, criticava o hábito de, basicamente, considerar a linguagem como uma associação de nomes, devido às consequências ilusórias dessa suposição ao nosso entendimento do pensamento como resultante, principalmente, da soma das suas partes discretas. James sugere a possibilidade de adoção de uma abordagem diferente da linguagem por considerar seus aspectos contínuos, relacionais ou transitivos, em vez de focar exclusivamente nos elementos substantivos. Ele parece convidar seus leitores a adotar uma atitude voltada para a linguagem complementando sua própria visão holística do pensamento como relações contínuas e envolventes. A autora explora a afirmação de que James considerava duas atitudes diferentes para a linguagem (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): uma abordagem mais crítica e uma disposição que está atenta à dinâmica, contextual e formação corpórea do significado das palavras. Esta leitura baseia-se na ideia, bem como outras, de que The Principles teve uma influência positiva em Wittgenstein, em vez de uma mera crítica—uma interpretação sustentada por um grupo de estudiosos recentes (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; e SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016).Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4783310.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p68-82Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-82Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-822316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833/32427Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDreon, Roberta2020-07-20T22:50:05Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47833Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2020-07-20T22:50:05Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein James sobre o fluxo da linguagem: com alguns comentários sobre sua influência em Wittgenstein |
title |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein |
spellingShingle |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein Dreon, Roberta Atomismo linguístico Holismo linguístico Ludwig Wittgenstein Teoria dinâmica do significado William James. Dynamic theory of meaning Linguistic atomism Linguistic holism Ludwig Wittgenstein William James. |
title_short |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein |
title_full |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein |
title_fullStr |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein |
title_full_unstemmed |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein |
title_sort |
James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein |
author |
Dreon, Roberta |
author_facet |
Dreon, Roberta |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dreon, Roberta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Atomismo linguístico Holismo linguístico Ludwig Wittgenstein Teoria dinâmica do significado William James. Dynamic theory of meaning Linguistic atomism Linguistic holism Ludwig Wittgenstein William James. |
topic |
Atomismo linguístico Holismo linguístico Ludwig Wittgenstein Teoria dinâmica do significado William James. Dynamic theory of meaning Linguistic atomism Linguistic holism Ludwig Wittgenstein William James. |
description |
This article supports a reading of the “Stream of Thought” chapter in The Principles of Psychology according to which James was not formulating an idea of linguistic meanings as private feelings occurring within the speaker’s mind, but rather criticizing the habit of basically considering language an association of names, because of the misleading consequence of this assumption for our understanding of thought as primarily resulting from the sum of its discrete parts. James was suggesting the possibility of adopting a different approach to language by considering its continuous, relational or transitive aspects, instead of focusing exclusively on substantive elements. He seems to be inviting his readers to adopt an attitude towards language complementing his own holistic view of thought as continuous and involving relations. The author explores the claim that James was considering two different attitudes towards language (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): a more critical approach and a disposition that is attentive to the dynamic, contextual and embodied shaping of the meaning of words. This reading is based on and further develops the idea that The Principles had a positive influence on Wittgenstein, rather than a merely critical one—an interpretation supported by a group of recent scholars (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; and SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833 10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p68-82 |
url |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p68-82 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833/32427 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-82 Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-82 2316-5278 1518-7187 reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) instacron:PUC_SP |
instname_str |
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
instacron_str |
PUC_SP |
institution |
PUC_SP |
reponame_str |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revcognitio@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387422284709888 |