James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dreon, Roberta
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833
Resumo: This article supports a reading of the “Stream of Thought” chapter in The Principles of Psychology according to which James was not formulating an idea of linguistic meanings as private feelings occurring within the speaker’s mind, but rather criticizing the habit of basically considering language an association of names, because of the misleading consequence of this assumption for our understanding of thought as primarily resulting from the sum of its discrete parts. James was suggesting the possibility of adopting a different approach to language by considering its continuous, relational or transitive aspects, instead of focusing exclusively on substantive elements. He seems to be inviting his readers to adopt an attitude towards language complementing his own holistic view of thought as continuous and involving relations. The author explores the claim that James was considering two different attitudes towards language (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): a more critical approach and a disposition that is attentive to the dynamic, contextual and embodied shaping of the meaning of words. This reading is based on and further develops the idea that The Principles had a positive influence on Wittgenstein, rather than a merely critical one—an interpretation supported by a group of recent scholars (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; and SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016).
id PUC_SP-15_36fd026aeeea4652c87aaa27c86e9633
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47833
network_acronym_str PUC_SP-15
network_name_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on WittgensteinJames sobre o fluxo da linguagem: com alguns comentários sobre sua influência em WittgensteinAtomismo linguísticoHolismo linguísticoLudwig WittgensteinTeoria dinâmica do significadoWilliam James.Dynamic theory of meaningLinguistic atomismLinguistic holismLudwig WittgensteinWilliam James.This article supports a reading of the “Stream of Thought” chapter in The Principles of Psychology according to which James was not formulating an idea of linguistic meanings as private feelings occurring within the speaker’s mind, but rather criticizing the habit of basically considering language an association of names, because of the misleading consequence of this assumption for our understanding of thought as primarily resulting from the sum of its discrete parts. James was suggesting the possibility of adopting a different approach to language by considering its continuous, relational or transitive aspects, instead of focusing exclusively on substantive elements. He seems to be inviting his readers to adopt an attitude towards language complementing his own holistic view of thought as continuous and involving relations. The author explores the claim that James was considering two different attitudes towards language (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): a more critical approach and a disposition that is attentive to the dynamic, contextual and embodied shaping of the meaning of words. This reading is based on and further develops the idea that The Principles had a positive influence on Wittgenstein, rather than a merely critical one—an interpretation supported by a group of recent scholars (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; and SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016).Este artigo sustenta uma leitura do capítulo “Stream of Thought” em The Principles of Psichology segundo o qual William James não formulou uma ideia de significados linguísticos como sentimentos privados que ocorrem dentro da mente do falante, ao contrário, criticava o hábito de, basicamente, considerar a linguagem como uma associação de nomes, devido às consequências ilusórias dessa suposição ao nosso entendimento do pensamento como resultante, principalmente, da soma das suas partes discretas. James sugere a possibilidade de adoção de uma abordagem diferente da linguagem por considerar seus aspectos contínuos, relacionais ou transitivos, em vez de focar exclusivamente nos elementos substantivos. Ele parece convidar seus leitores a adotar uma atitude voltada para a linguagem complementando sua própria visão holística do pensamento como relações contínuas e envolventes. A autora explora a afirmação de que James considerava duas atitudes diferentes para a linguagem (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): uma abordagem mais crítica e uma disposição que está atenta à dinâmica, contextual e formação corpórea do significado das palavras. Esta leitura baseia-se na ideia, bem como outras, de que The Principles teve uma influência positiva em Wittgenstein, em vez de uma mera crítica—uma interpretação sustentada por um grupo de estudiosos recentes (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; e SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016).Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo2020-07-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/4783310.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p68-82Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-82Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-822316-52781518-7187reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)instacron:PUC_SPenghttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833/32427Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDreon, Roberta2020-07-20T22:50:05Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47833Revistahttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofiaPRIhttps://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/oairevcognitio@gmail.com2316-52781518-7187opendoar:2020-07-20T22:50:05Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
James sobre o fluxo da linguagem: com alguns comentários sobre sua influência em Wittgenstein
title James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
spellingShingle James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
Dreon, Roberta
Atomismo linguístico
Holismo linguístico
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Teoria dinâmica do significado
William James.
Dynamic theory of meaning
Linguistic atomism
Linguistic holism
Ludwig Wittgenstein
William James.
title_short James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
title_full James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
title_fullStr James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
title_full_unstemmed James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
title_sort James on the stream of language: with some remarks on his influence on Wittgenstein
author Dreon, Roberta
author_facet Dreon, Roberta
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dreon, Roberta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Atomismo linguístico
Holismo linguístico
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Teoria dinâmica do significado
William James.
Dynamic theory of meaning
Linguistic atomism
Linguistic holism
Ludwig Wittgenstein
William James.
topic Atomismo linguístico
Holismo linguístico
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Teoria dinâmica do significado
William James.
Dynamic theory of meaning
Linguistic atomism
Linguistic holism
Ludwig Wittgenstein
William James.
description This article supports a reading of the “Stream of Thought” chapter in The Principles of Psychology according to which James was not formulating an idea of linguistic meanings as private feelings occurring within the speaker’s mind, but rather criticizing the habit of basically considering language an association of names, because of the misleading consequence of this assumption for our understanding of thought as primarily resulting from the sum of its discrete parts. James was suggesting the possibility of adopting a different approach to language by considering its continuous, relational or transitive aspects, instead of focusing exclusively on substantive elements. He seems to be inviting his readers to adopt an attitude towards language complementing his own holistic view of thought as continuous and involving relations. The author explores the claim that James was considering two different attitudes towards language (GAVIN, 1992, p. 69): a more critical approach and a disposition that is attentive to the dynamic, contextual and embodied shaping of the meaning of words. This reading is based on and further develops the idea that The Principles had a positive influence on Wittgenstein, rather than a merely critical one—an interpretation supported by a group of recent scholars (BONCOMPAGNI, 2012a, 2012b; GOODMAN, 2002; JACKMAN, 2006, 20017; and SANFELIX-VIDARTE, 2016).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833
10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p68-82
url https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833
identifier_str_mv 10.23925/2316-5278.2020v21i1p68-82
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/cognitiofilosofia/article/view/47833/32427
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-82
Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): Cognitio: revista de filosofia; 68-82
2316-5278
1518-7187
reponame:Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron:PUC_SP
instname_str Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
instacron_str PUC_SP
institution PUC_SP
reponame_str Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
collection Cognitio (São Paulo. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cognitio (São Paulo. Online) - Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (PUC-SP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcognitio@gmail.com
_version_ 1803387422284709888